The Archangel
Well-Known Member
To All,
Winman is well-known to us as a KJV-guy. I ran across this problem a few months ago and I don't hold it to be a big problem (mostly because I'm not KJV-only).
I'm hoping that Winman or anyone else can tell me why this is not a true problem.
So here's the question:
I've been wondering how King James Only Arminians deal with the Fruit of the Spirit passage of Galatians 5.
The King James Version (KJV) clearly states that Faith is a fruit of the Spirit:
Now, most modern translations--ESV, NIV, etc.--translate this thusly:
So KJV Arminians are left with an uncomfortable conundrum:
1. Hold that the KJV is the one true translation (as many KJV-only people claim) and accept that a person's faith is a gift--a fruit--of the Holy Spirit
OR
2. Reject the KJV as the true translation because you cannot accept that faith is a gift--or fruit--of the Spirit.
Which is it? I'm sure the common answer will be "neither." But I hope Winman or anyone else can explain why these two points are not at odds.
Blessings,
The Archangel
Winman is well-known to us as a KJV-guy. I ran across this problem a few months ago and I don't hold it to be a big problem (mostly because I'm not KJV-only).
I'm hoping that Winman or anyone else can tell me why this is not a true problem.
So here's the question:
I've been wondering how King James Only Arminians deal with the Fruit of the Spirit passage of Galatians 5.
The King James Version (KJV) clearly states that Faith is a fruit of the Spirit:
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. (emphasis mine)
Now, it would appear that the KJV is stating that Faith comes by way of the spirit--so that faith itself is an outworking of what the spirit does in you.
Now, most modern translations--ESV, NIV, etc.--translate this thusly:
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. (ESV; emphasis mine)
So the modern translations say it is faithfulness that the spirit produces. The Greek is πίστις--meaning "Faith," not "faithfulness."
So KJV Arminians are left with an uncomfortable conundrum:
1. Hold that the KJV is the one true translation (as many KJV-only people claim) and accept that a person's faith is a gift--a fruit--of the Holy Spirit
OR
2. Reject the KJV as the true translation because you cannot accept that faith is a gift--or fruit--of the Spirit.
Which is it? I'm sure the common answer will be "neither." But I hope Winman or anyone else can explain why these two points are not at odds.
Blessings,
The Archangel