What is to accept, Brother Willis?
This verse does not do anything for Arminianism or this nameless theology that some espouse on baptistboard.
I am neither Calvinistic nor Arminian. I get my theology from the Bible as many others do. I dare say that no two men agree with each other on all things. Having said that let's look at the Scripture you gave.
What the Word of God does CLEARLY tell us is:
Isa 45:5-7 I am the Lord, and there is no other, besides Me there is no God; I equip you, though you do not know me, that people may know, from the rising of the sun and from the west, that there is none besides Me; I am the Lord, and there is no other. I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the Lord, who does all these things.
1. There is no other God but Jehovah.
2. Speaking to Israel he tells them that he is the one that "equips" them.
3. He repeats that there is no other God but him.
4. He forms light and he forms darkness--a reference to creation.
5. He makes things well, and brings about calamity (natural disasters I would presume).
6. Yes, God does all these things. We all agree on these things. None of them attribute evil to God. None of them even hint that God would be the author of evil, or ordain or decree evil. Nothing in that verse comes remotely close to teaching that.
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all My purpose,’
1. God declares all things from the beginning to the end--his omniscience.
2. His counsel shall stand. Of course: He is God. He is sovereign.
3. His purposes will be accomplished. How can it be otherwise?
There is nothing here to suggest that anything evil can be attributed to God; that God decrees evil; that God is the author of evil or ordains it.
Acts 4:27-28 For truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your hand and Your plan had predestined to take place.
All of us agree that Christ is the Lamb slain before the foundation of the world, which this verse teaches. So we have no argument here.
Proverbs 16:4 "God hath made all things for himself, yea, even the WICKED for the day of judgment."
Young's literal puts it this way:
All things hath Jehovah wrought for Himself, And also the wicked worketh for a day of evil. (Proverbs 16:4)
--Not so cut and dry now is it?
Perhaps the NET Bible puts it best.
The LORD works everything for its own ends
even the wicked for the day of disaster. (NET)
The wicked will indeed face a day of judgment (disaster for them), but why? Because they chose it. The wicked works for a day of evil, instead of choosing Christ. All his works are evil. Their end will certainly be evil, but the NT sheds more light on this truth then the OT gives us. One cannot isolate a verse of poetry like this without gaining truth from other parts of the Bible.
A primary rule in hermeneutics is that you ALWAYS interpret the ambiguous in light of the clear.
Quite correct. The clear are the truths presented in the NT.
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:18)
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. (John 3:36)
--That is what is clear.
The Word of God is clear and repeatedly so.
It is poor hermeneutics to take an ambiguous passage and create some new doctrine from it while ignoring the bulk of the Word of God, especially those clear passages that teach the opposite of what you try to make the unclear passages say.
Free will is taught over and over and over again.
It does not matter what you agree with, Willis. God's Word is clear that it was more than just permission. Permission is only part of it.
Job said, "The LORD hath taken away." The SCripture then testifies of this remark by Job, "In all this Job did not charge God foolishly."
I have answered this objection before.
These are the words of Job. Yes they are inspired, but they are Job's words, not God's words. There is a big difference.
God himself removed the hedge. God himself gave the permission; allowed Satan to afflict Job. Nothing could be done to Job without the express permission of God. Satan had to have permission from God. Job had no idea what was happening in heaven when he responded in this way. God gave Satan permission to afflict Job. This point must be conceded.
That's Bible. It's very simple. It ought to be enough. Job did not say, "The Lord PERMITTED Satan to do this to me." To make it say that is to add to the Word of God, which is a dangerous thing. Job said, "The LORD hath taken away..."
That is because Job did not know what was going on in heaven. So how could he say that. We also don't know what is happening in heaven right now. Job spoke as much as he knew, but it wasn't accurate. What was accurate was that God gave permission to Satan. The first chapter is very clear about that. That is what it teaches--God allowed Satan to afflict Job.
The fact of the matter is this: Satan meant it for evil- God meant it for good.
God allowed Satan to afflict Job, and yes he had a purpose in it, and knew that his faith, though it be tried as fire would be found to the praise and honor and glory to the Lord. It is the will of God that all Christians God. God does not ordain or decree evil to happen. He is not the author of it. But he allows it to happen.