You're wrong, 12 strings. And what do you BASE this claim on? I do not think you base it on anything. It is just conjecture and it is wrong.
There have been NUMEROUS books written on this subject. Have you looked at a single one?
Read James Whites' book- The King James Only Controversy.
These people believe the KJV is INFALLIBLE.
You saying otherwise is the crazy thing, 12 strings.
The problem is there is a wide range of KJVO beliefs. I was probably too hasty in saying MOST KJVO people simply think its the best. I do recognize that many beleive it to be perfect. However, even those that hold to KJV infallability have not lessened the infallibility of the originals. They have simply added a beleif that God perfectly guided the KJV translators to produce a perfect english Bible. An incorrect belief, but not heresy.
I would like to know what BIBLICAL doctrine this violates. (violating the chicago statement on inerrancy is not heresy).
I have read Dr. White's book, but it was several years ago and I do not own it. I have read other writings on both sides of the issue and have come to the conclusion that KJVO simply does not stand up to rational scrutiny... unless they are arguing simply that the TR is more trustworthy, In which case it is a bit more rational, but still flawed by rejecting the much greater number of ancient manuscripts we have since found. KJVOism is incorrect, and can cause much divisiveness and confusion about the Bible where there does not need to be. Also, The KJV is written in a language that most english speakers to day do not speak. Also, It has been edited numerous times since 1611, and so which edition is the perfect one? I do not believe they have an answer to these questions.
However, I have yet to see the Heresy of the position. I am convinced that if I were invited to preach at a KJVO church, the course of action that would honor God would be to preach out of a KJV Bible...Not stand up and condemn KJVOism.