dhk
It should seem evident to SBM that the rich young ruler of Mat.19 and Mark 10, who departed from Jesus sorrowful having chosen his riches over Christ, was not one of the elect.
No it is not obvious he was not one of the elect. I believe he was since Jesus Loved him.
I don't think you can say he was not Justified. Christ it appears caused him to see his lost state and his deceived state, observe how he acted when he left Christ's presence Matt 19:22
22But when the young man heard that saying, he went away
sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
Mk 10:22
22And he was sad at that saying, and went away
grieved: for he had great possessions.
Because Mk recorded that Jesus Loved him, I would say that he was Justified by Christ's obedience, but did not know it !
The other times the scripture records that Jesus Loved individuals, from all indications they were believers.
Jn 11:5
Now
Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus.
Jn 13:1
Now before the feast of the passover, when
Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father,
having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end.
I believe the ruler was one of His own, since He Loved him !
Jn 13:23
Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples,
whom Jesus loved.
Rev 1:5
And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth.
Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
I believe I will see the young man in Glory...