No one has ever insinuated anything about you but you keep make accusations. I asked you if you wanted to live under Gestapo Putin and you declined to answer so it is correctly assumed that you want others to live under the murderer but you do not want to live under him. Isn't that the epitome of hypocrisy?
Revelation 20:8 (KJV) And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom [is] as the sand of the sea.
So now you've taken to lying?
Is the need to believe Washington's lies so powerful with you that you'll even resort to lying about what you've already committed to text (that anyone can go back and read) in order to conceal the truth from yourself?
What's hypocritical is how you and your buddies demand that myself and other's prove every word we say while you can go on making one unfounded allegation after another never offering proof and refusing to provide it even after you've been asked to provide it several times over.
What's hypocritical is you insinuating I'm a traitor because I asked you to provide evidence (which is now very obvious you cannot) to support your allegations. And the way in which you've chosen to hide the fact you don't have any evidence to support your allegations.
Now you've gone to the extreme and started lying about what you've done for eleven pages.
Is believing Washington's lies so important to you that you'll become a liar yourself just to keep believing in them?
Sanction-Drunk West Forgets to Target ISIS Sponsors
As the US and Europe prepare another round of sanctions against Russia over the ongoing Ukrainian conflict, the third round of such sanctions since the conflict began shortly after the Euromaidan unrest resulted in the installation of a NATO-backed regime in Kiev, a curious and inexplicable oversight appears to have been made.
While wild accusations have been leveled against Russia over its involvement over the violence in Ukraine, claims ranging from covert support up to and including unsubstantiated claims of a “full scale invasion,” prominent media organizations across the Western World have for years reported a flow of cash, weapons, equipment and fighters from America’s allies in the Persian Gulf as well as from nations like NATO member Turkey, and into the conflict raging within Syria’s borders.
While baseless claims leveled against Russia have served as ample justification for the West to continue leveling sanctions against Moscow, no sanctions have as of yet been leveled against the overt sponsors of militancy and, in fact, terrorism in Syria. So widespread has state-sponsored terrorism become in the Middle East that what began as a limited proxy war against Syria has transformed into an immense regional army with tens of thousands of paid soldiers requiring millions of dollars a day to operate across multiple borders and confounding the forces of Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon combined.
ISIS is State-Sponsored, So Why Aren’t These States Being Sanctioned?
Clearly, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria also known as ISIS or ISIL, are the benefactors of vast state-sponsorship and yet the West has not identified nor condemned these sponsors, let alone move toward leveling sanctions similar to what it is seeking to impose upon Moscow.
News articles by prominent British and American news outlets like the Daily Beast’s “America’s Allies Are Funding ISIS,” the London Telegraph’s “How Isil is funded, trained and operating in Iraq and Syria,” and the Daily Mail’s “Cameron tells European leaders to ‘be good to their word’ and stop funding ISIS with ransom payments,” give explanations ranging from outright admissions that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and Turkey are directly arming, funding, aiding and abetting ISIS, to descriptions that read like an immense money laundering operation, to ridiculous claims including “ransom payments” and “robbed banks” have been behind ISIS’ regional rise to menace.
At one point in the Daily Beast’s article it claims, “the U.S. has made the case as strongly as they can to regional countries, including Kuwait. But ultimately when you take a hands off, leading from behind approach to things, people don’t take you seriously and they take matters into their own hands.” If ever there was a case to use sanctions to be “taken seriously,” it would appear to be in this case, yet sure enough, no sanctions appear to be on the table.
Systematic Hypocrisy Undermines Legitimacy
Read More At:
http://journal-neo.org/2014/09/21/sanction-drunk-west-forgets-to-target-isis-sponsors/
You have for the last eleven pages defended some of the biggest lying hypocrites (and their lies) on the planet CMG. You've willingly joined their camp and helped them spread their lies. And now you're forced to even lie to yourself to go on believing their lies.
It's a sad thing to witness. Just admit you were neo-conned again and learn from it, like men do.
