Featured Inquiring minds want to know...

It's a case of do as I say. Don't do as I do.

 

Robert K. Fall "He and I are the same?" (12/15/2014)

Yes, indeed you are. So please explain why you have done what is forbidden.

 

Post #51 in the "New Calvinist Thread"

To which robt k. fall responded in post #53

Now, has he actually stated he(Squire and robt. k. fall are one and the same?


This may get me banned, but if it does, I want to ley you guys know it's been a real pleasure...

If Squire does not come clean and tell us the truth, he is nothing but a BALD FACE LIAR!!!!


Brother KYR exposed him, and it's time for him to come clean....

 

Brother Arch, all I am asking from Squire Robertson/robt k. fall is an apology for lying to me. He openly stated he wasn't Squire, then Brother KYR exposed him, and he's yet to admit/apologize to me for lying. Is that too much to ask?

 

Another "witch hunt " I see.....what is the need for purity gentlemen that is so prevalent in your need and desire to expose? I'm sorry but I'm not going to be the one cornering someone and throwing the first rock. Rather my eyes are on Christ...and he is writing something in the dirt. Follow His example. :godisgood:

 

Squire - I was under the impression that we were not allowed multiple memberships. This is why so many are upset about this issue.

You're basically presenting two personas to the group, which, regardless your feelings on deception, is duplicitous. You are using your two memberships to present differing opinions on topics. Claiming neutrality under one name while offering a non-neutral opinion under another name is double-mindedness, whether intentional or not, and the Bible speaks against it.

Please note that this is not an attack on you. I don't know you well enough to launch an attack on you. I'm only posting in regards to what I've read in this and the other thread concerning the dual-membership issue. God bless.

I googled the Statement of Faith of the Council of Evangelical Christian-Baptist Churches and found it very interesting. I actually find myself in agreement with some of the items listed therein, even though I've never claimed myself to be Arminian. I tend to stay away from labeling myself under the Cal vs Arm banners. Thanks.

 

I see calvisnists are circling the wagons again. Jeesh I cannot understand why anyone in the word would think cals are so hateful.

 

Stuttering there; aren't you?

You are so two-faced. You would not raise a peep if Dr. Bob had two identies on the BB? Come on, you're not fooling anyone.

 

What are you talking about? Oh wait I see because he is a Calvinist. You know what, you just told on your self. This clearly indicates that you are harassing him because he is not a Calvinist. Thanks for the admission.

Not only is it an admission that you personally have an ungodly animus toward those who are not Calvinists but that all of you Calvinists do. Thanks for the divisions that only comes straight from the pit of hell.

 

Thank you Squire for that.



RM, it's are about fairness. It's not right to ban someone....The Biblicist, and then ignore what an admin was doing. I PM'd an admin and got no response and nothing was done about it. It should be the same for everyone of us.


The appellation under our username should not cause different rules....

 

It's not an Cal vs Non-Cal thing with me. It's about fairness on the board...

 

I'm in full agreement PT. Whatever his stated rationale could be, it is dishonest to use two different handles for one person. It's against the very rules he is here to enforce! People have been banned for doing what he's doing. His excuse defies the imagination.

Squire/Robert: you are to have one, and only one handle here. No alias is allowed. Stick with one and abandon the other. That's grace because lowly peons cannot get away with what you have foisted on us.

 

Actually it is common practice to not allow multiple accounts accept for admins and mods. It is done all over the internet and when I had my board I did the same thing.

You people do not get to make the rules or set the boundaries for them. If Andrew wants to allow mods and admins to have multiple accounts there is a good reason for that. It is your responsibility to worry about what the rules are for you, it is not your place to worry about what the rules are for mods and admins.

Squire having more than one account is perfectly fine. It gives the mods and admins an opportunity to interact on the board outside of their admin role. You all just need to grow up and send your wagons on down the trail.

 

Yea, ummmhmmm that is why all you cals have circled the wagons. It is none of your business what he has.

 

It's dishonest to play like a Cal and a non-Cal simultaneously. That's doing exactly the same as a troll. It's EXCEEDINGLY dishonest (treachery actually) if he were the one behind banning The Bib:

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2172264#post2172264

 

Your swagger is on grand display RM. How about equal treatment for all here?

Will the above preach for your Sunday sermon?

 

Squire is being canered and it is sad and appalling