Your context did not change the meaning of the UN speech at all.
I am sorry if you cannot understand, but it in fact not only changed the meaning, it reversed it completely. Whether he was being honest or not, is another debate (I personally don't think he was being honest). But the fact is, in context it says the opposite of what you are wanting it to say.
Nor is it true that it was just an idiotic statement because Obama saw that the Egyptian went to prison, where he still is, and Obama saw that Google took down the YouTube video portraying the life of Mohammed for what it was--so Obama saw that one guy paid a price for "slandering" Mohammed.
Again, I'm not sure what you're getting at here. You're being slightly incoherent. Your meaning isn't clear. I can't answer this paragraph without some clarification.
At any rate, the new messiah did not stand for freedom of speech
I'll agree with this part.
Freedom of speech isn't about religion. It's about the ability to speak out against the government without repercussion. Religious freedom is what you're looking for, not freedom of speech.
when he told the UN a couple of years ago: The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.
And there you go again, misrepresenting what he said in order to twist it to your agenda. Again I will remind you that this is unbecoming a Christian. Speak to his actions, speak to his words, criticize him all you want. Lying is still wrong.