Actually, eating meat on Friday was once a mortal sin according to the church.
Lakeside is just going to say that doesn't count. It's a cult.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually, eating meat on Friday was once a mortal sin according to the church.
You avoided annsi's point. Eating meat was a mortal sin. Now it is not, except on good Friday. Is that correct? Why and how can this be changed. After Vatican II, a loophole appeared. You didn't not answer her, you just gave the prepared Catholic dodge.
It was never a mortal sin
Since the number of days of fast and abstinence are greatly reduced, it would be a mortal sin if someone KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY and INTENTIONALLY ate meat on a Friday of Lent or on Ash Wednesday or ate between meals or ate more than one full meal on Ash Wednesday or Good Friday. Former manuals spoke of 4 oz or more to violate the fast as a mortal sin, less than 4 oz being venial; 2 oz of meat to violate abstinence, less for venial. Today, we do not get into the number game.
Actually, eating meat on Friday was once a mortal sin according to the church.
I'm sorry but that's wrong:
http://ewtn.com/vexperts/showmessage_print.asp?number=327418&language=en
Actually no.....you aren't going to hell for an obligatory action that was only designed forfasting. If you wantonly killed someone...if you didn't go to their church...that was interperted as a mortal sin..Thank heavens for confession (a sacrument)...it expunges your sins. At least that's the way the nuns and Jesuits taught me.
Yea well he is wrong....another EWTN expert.:rollseyes:
So, if a person ate meat on Friday with the full intention of completely breaking their relationship with God and Church, then that person is in mortal sin and God will judge him accordingly.
But what of mortal sin?
Before considering mortal sin with respect to Friday abstinence it’s important to briefly recall what holds for any mortal sin: For a sin to be sufficiently serious that it is ‘mortal’ there are three conditions that must hold: the matter itself must be grave (i.e. when considered in the abstract, apart from the person acting, the thing itself being done must be serious), the person acting needs to fully know what he or she is doing, and the person acting needs to give deliberate consent to what they are doing (CCC 1857). When sins are referred to in the abstract as ‘mortal’ it is always the matter of the sin that is being discussed.
Friday Abstinence and Grave Matter
In our modern society, and in the contemporary Church, the notion of penance has almost entirely faded from the popular consciousness. As a consequence, it is difficult for us to appreciate just how gravely important the pre-modern Christian Tradition considered penance to be. Yet, even a casual reading of saints and pre-modern scholars indicates a different set of priorities, and the pre-Conciliar teaching that breaking the law of Friday abstinence was 'grave matter' for mortal sin is something that can be found in any of the older Manuals of moral theology: The Manualists argued that the seriousness of the Christian obligation to do penance, combined with its specification by Church law, means that this is a matter of mortal sin. This said, they also argued that the matter of this sin is such that the quantity of meat eaten and the frequency with this is done would affect whether the sin concerned was a matter of venial sin or mortal sin. To consider another example, the sin of theft is also a mortal sin and one that similarly admits of what is called ‘parvity of matter’, i.e. if you are only stealing something small like a grape then the matter is not substantial enough for it to be the grave matter that constitutes a mortal sin. Concerning Friday abstinence, however, there was no consensus among the Manualists as to how much meat, or with what frequency, constituted 'grave matter' for mortal sin.
The Catholic Church is the one founded by Jesus Christ and contains all the truth that God intends for us to know.
We are created to know Jesus Christ, to love Him and serve Him. A life spent without knowing Jesus Christ is wasted and without hope.
Jesus Christ is God made flesh through the blessed Virgin Mary. No one can truly know God unless they come to know Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ came to show the world its terrible state of darkness, its need for redemption, the unthinkable love of God for all humanity, and the glorious potential of all human being.
Jesus Christ revealed His love throughout His life, but particularly on the cross, where He willingly subjected Himself to the agonizing death of a slave in order to save sinners.
Jesus Christ lives and reigns today in heaven. He sends His Spirit to be with His church and disciples so that the whole world can know Him.
Jesus Christ is still in the world today. He is fully present in all Catholic tabernacles in the world in the form of Bread and Wine. He is the Bread of Life which He invites all faithful to consume and thereby receive Life from above.
Have pity on me, O Lord, and give me Jesus!
No, the Bible contains all that a person needs to know. The RCC doctrine is in a state of constant flux ever changing with the political winds of time.The Catholic Church is the one founded by Jesus Christ and contains all the truth that God intends for us to know.
One has to know Jesus before they can serve Him. What does the RCC teach about "knowing" Christ, about having a personal relationship with him? They don't. They teach that salvation is through the church, through baptism, through the keeping of the sacraments. This is totally opposite to what the Bible teaches. Someday those that believe these things will answer to Christ:We are created to know Jesus Christ, to love Him and serve Him. A life spent without knowing Jesus Christ is wasted and without hope.
--Then why do you come to Mary first, and ask her for intercession.Jesus Christ is God made flesh through the blessed Virgin Mary. No one can truly know God unless they come to know Jesus Christ.
--Your doctrines of Purgatory, indulgences, Mariolatry, and other such doctrines demonstrate that you don't believe the above statement. You don't believe that Christ came to the world to die for our sins or to provide redemption. If you did you wouldn't believe in either baptismal regeneration or in Purgatory.Jesus Christ came to show the world its terrible state of darkness, its need for redemption, the unthinkable love of God for all humanity, and the glorious potential of all human being.
--Does that mean everyone is saved--absolutely everyone in the world?Jesus Christ revealed His love throughout His life, but particularly on the cross, where He willingly subjected Himself to the agonizing death of a slave in order to save sinners.
Yeah? What "church" is that? Do you personally know "His Spirit?" How?Jesus Christ lives and reigns today in heaven. He sends His Spirit to be with His church and disciples so that the whole world can know Him.
Nice sweet platitudes, but heretical!Jesus Christ is still in the world today. He is fully present in all Catholic tabernacles in the world in the form of Bread and Wine. He is the Bread of Life which He invites all faithful to consume and thereby receive Life from above.
Indeed you need his mercy.Have pity on me, O Lord, and give me Jesus!
I give you a lengthy post with plenty of Scripture and you can't refute it so you just deny it. Pitiful!DHK, your thoughts on this subject are contrary to the Bible. For the Bible tells us that it is the "church," not the Bible, albeit that Sacred Holy Scripture is all important if under the correct and only interpretation as by how the Canonical List of Holy Books that comprise our Holy Bible was used and accepted by you also. In short, only One Interpretation period.
You cannot find one verse that simply says that the Holy Bible is more important than the church, not one, yet there are more than a few that tells us that the church is all that Jesus really Loves, Cares about and gives Authority to. So start finding those bible verses that gives more authority to the Bible than the church.
You know what....I just cant stand formal religion. It is not God to send anyone to hell, we do that ourselves. Christ came into this world to save all who was given to Him by the Father. That is a doctrine I will stand by because its validated by the scripture. Other than that, oh well.
These days, after conversion into Christianity, its the Bible & the Holy Spirit. Ive no trust in man.
First, Jesus is the Word:DHK, show me those Verses from the Bible { NT } where Jesus said that it was the Bible, not the church that He Loved, gave Authority to, or centered His new Christian Faith upon.
I think you've got that right.
I appreciate fellowship, but true fellowship is hard to find.
I gave you countless verses. Why did you ignore them. Go and meditate on them. The first verse that comes to mind is:DHK, you still haven't given the Verses from the NT where Jesus says that the Bible [ His Word ] is more authoritative than His church, or where Jesus tells us that He loves the Holy Bible/ Holy Sacred Scripture more than His church or preaches that the Bible, not the church, is centered upon His newly formed Christian Faith.
