Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I do not believe in conversion for man has no freewill to save himself. That is a religious myth not a scriptural fact. God caused man to fall. Without a fall thee is no reason for a savior. Was not there a savior before there was a sinner? For the lamb was slain from the foundation of the earth.From a friend's FB page.
All these years with BB and I still don't know how to attach an image to the post.
So, anybody who's wondering what this is all about, there's a file attached.
Just leaving tit with y'all.
"Conversion" does not mean that man saves himself. It is instead the cry "repent and believe".I do not believe in conversion for man has no freewill to save himself. That is a religious myth not a scriptural fact. God caused man to fall. Without a fall thee is no reason for a savior. Was not there a savior before there was a sinner? For the lamb was slain from the foundation of the earth.
Impossible for carnal man to call upon God for he is carnal. We are saved by grace not carnal man repenting. Carnal man cannot believe with out God"Conversion" does not mean that man saves himself. It is instead the cry "repent and believe".
What I am saying is that conversion is the process by which God saves men. This includes Gods drawing, regeneration, repentance, and belief. And I am leaning towards Köstenberger (and if I remember correctly, Carson) that baptism, while not a part of salvation itself, belongs to conversion as a manifestation of obedience (a fruit if the Spirit).Impossible for carnal man to call upon God for he is carnal. We are saved by grace not carnal man repenting. Carnal man cannot believe with out God
save himself from what ?I do not believe in conversion for man has no freewill to save himself.
Yeah, right.That is a religious myth not a scriptural fact.
God caused man to fall. Without a fall thee is no reason for a savior. Was not there a savior before there was a sinner? For the lamb was slain from the foundation of the earth.
save himself from what ?
Yeah, right.
I've met people who say they don't believe in the doctrine of the Trinity because the word is not even mentioned in the Bible, even if the concept and principle is all over the Scriptures from the Old Testament all the way to the New Testament.
Now, I meet you who do not believe in conversion and call it a religious myth, when the Savior Himself talked about conversion. As in:
Matthew 13:15
for this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
Matthew 18:3
and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Mark 4:12
that seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
Luke 22:32
but I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.
John 12:40
He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
God caused nobody to sin, and God did not cause the fall.
He knew Adam would fall, not because He wants Adam to fall, but because Adam, is a created being.
And if you look at your Bible, everything else around us was created by the word of His mouth..."and God said, let there be...."
EXCEPT for man.
With man, He took of the dirt of the ground and created him from out of that dirt, and breathed the breath of life into him, all the others, birds, fowls, fish, they were already living creatures when created.
Man alone was from dust, a collection of lifeless, arid, totally waterless stuff from the ground.
Man had NO spiritual life in him, the only reason for him being able to fellowship face to face with his Creator is because he had no sin in him, at that point.
But he was duly warned, that on the day he violates the law in the garden, concerning that fruit, he will die.
And because he had no spiritual life in him, he believed another creature.
And the reason he was driven off the garden was clear: lest he take of the fruit of the tree of life, and eat of it, and live forever....
You pose perhaps the most important question for evangelicals. Is regeneration CAUSED by man or God? Romans 9 says it is God's will, not man's will that determines who will be saved. But Romans 10 says "anyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved". So is everyone who "makes a decision for Christ" calling on the name of the Lord"? The modern heresy of decisional regeneration says "yes". That heresy promotes the idea that anyone who "makes a decision for Christ", has "saving faith" with de facto regeneration. The answer to this question is found in examining "converts" for fruit of the Holy Spirit. When Jesus says, "depart from Me, for I never knew you", there is no discussion of the 21st century view of "saving faith". Fruit of the Holy Spirit is only possible in people who God has supernaturally regenerated and indwelt with the Holy Spirit. This way of answering your question avoids the red herrings. Historically, "conversion" and "salvation" were considered synonymous by American Evangelicals until Scottish Common Sense Realism changed the salvation paradigm from God-relational to man-mechanical; from supernatural to psychological, from an all or nothing spiritual experience to a tipping point of the mind being convinced to serve God over self. After the First Great Awakening, as Presbyterians became more influential in American theology, Scottish Common Sense Realism absorbed the American Jonathan Edwards inspired theologies of Hopkins and Bellamy. By the Civil War, regeneration was a de facto assumption tied to "saving faith" is Scripture. Scottish Common Sense Realism infected Evangelical theology in England as well. Charles Spurgeon identified Scottish Common Sense Realism as the main culprit in the Downgrade of theology, in which the Holy Spirit was a vestigial remnant, a mere influence.From a friend's FB page.
All these years with BB and I still don't know how to attach an image to the post.
So, anybody who's wondering what this is all about, there's a file attached.
Just leaving tit with y'all.
View attachment 1381
Is regeneration CAUSED by man or God?
From a friend's FB page.
I see carnal man as dead spiritually to the realm of God this means a carnal man cannot see, hear smell touch the realm of God which is spiritual not carnal, earthly or physical. Look at Eph 2 in context.You pose perhaps the most important question for evangelicals. Is regeneration CAUSED by man or God? Romans 9 says it is God's will, not man's will that determines who will be saved. But Romans 10 says "anyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved". So is everyone who "makes a decision for Christ" calling on the name of the Lord"? The modern heresy of decisional regeneration says "yes". That heresy promotes the idea that anyone who "makes a decision for Christ", has "saving faith" with de facto regeneration. The answer to this question is found in examining "converts" for fruit of the Holy Spirit. When Jesus says, "depart from Me, for I never knew you", there is no discussion of the 21st century view of "saving faith". Fruit of the Holy Spirit is only possible in people who God has supernaturally regenerated and indwelt with the Holy Spirit. This way of answering your question avoids the red herrings. Historically, "conversion" and "salvation" were considered synonymous by American Evangelicals until Scottish Common Sense Realism changed the salvation paradigm from God-relational to man-mechanical; from supernatural to psychological, from an all or nothing spiritual experience to a tipping point of the mind being convinced to serve God over self. After the First Great Awakening, as Presbyterians became more influential in American theology, Scottish Common Sense Realism absorbed the American Jonathan Edwards inspired theologies of Hopkins and Bellamy. By the Civil War, regeneration was a de facto assumption tied to "saving faith" is Scripture. Scottish Common Sense Realism infected Evangelical theology in England as well. Charles Spurgeon identified Scottish Common Sense Realism as the main culprit in the Downgrade of theology, in which the Holy Spirit was a vestigial remnant, a mere influence.
13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Jn 1
....a threefold denial of any participation of man in the heavenly birth.
God is not calling all people now.12 But as many as received him.....
Not much of a denial in this verse.
carnal man cannot receive God until they are called they are carnal. can a dead man choose?12 But as many as received him.....
Not much of a denial in this verse.
12 But as many as received him.....
God is not calling all people now.
If God does not call you, you cannot come.]
Ummmmm.
"But now commanders ALL men everywhere ......to repent. "
I will admit I did misspoke on conversion but my point is this man has no freewill to convert himself for he is carnal and dead in trust-passes and sin. We are saved by grace not carnal man freely choosing.
How can carnal man chose Christ? It’s a spiritual experience to choose Christ. 1 Corinthians 2:
14But the natural, nonspiritual man does not accept or welcome or admit into his heart the gifts and teachings and revelations of the Spirit of God, for they are folly (meaningless nonsense) to him; and he is incapable of knowing them [of progressively recognizing, understanding, and becoming better acquainted with them] because they are spiritually discerned and estimated and appreciated.
Now lets get down to little Adam in the garden. First of all yes Adam is a dust man and God FORMED him from the dust of the earth and made him a living soul. But you are leaving out a important fact in context. Do not Baptist believe in context? God created man in His image and likeness before he formed man into living soul. God's image and likeness is spirit. Man has a spirit and a soul and a carnal mind. Man's soul and carnal mind are the same foundation for they were both formed at the same time after man was first created.
More points.... Who placed man in the garden? Answer God. Who ordained a serpent to be their? Answer God. Who formed Adam into a dust man a carnal man a soulish man? Answer God. Who formed a man who was innocent and gullible naive? Answer God. Without a sinner why would we need a savior? Did not God created a savior long before a sinner because he knew the savior was needed? For the lamb was slain from the foundation of the earth.
Salvation of God included the entire package, as God enables the sinner to repent/receive Jesusa as Lord, be justified/sauctified, and so none of us would be saved apart from his grace and mercy!What I am saying is that conversion is the process by which God saves men. This includes Gods drawing, regeneration, repentance, and belief. And I am leaning towards Köstenberger (and if I remember correctly, Carson) that baptism, while not a part of salvation itself, belongs to conversion as a manifestation of obedience (a fruit if the Spirit).