• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Atonement

Status
Not open for further replies.

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
You are not now ignoring the passage. Thank you. Better late than never.
Exactly so. But Jesus' body had top be broken and His blood shed (1 Corinthians 11:24-25) to bring in that covenant. God's justice and His wrath against sin had to be propitiated. Now if you had read OP in the 'Penal Substitution' thread, you wouldn't have to ask about this. Here it is AGAIN :Rolleyes

So we come to the necessity of Atonement. We must be very careful in saying that God cannot do something, but the Scriptures tell us that God ‘cannot deny Himself’ (2 Timothy 2:13). In the light of Proverbs 17:15, God surely cannot become an abomination to Himself by justifying guilty sinners without a penalty for sin! Be it said that God is under no obligation to show mercy to sinful humans; the angels who sinned had no Redeemer but were ‘cast down to hell and delivered into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgement’ (2 Peter 2:4). But if God, ‘according to the good pleasure of His will’ (Ephesians 1:5), has decreed mercy and salvation for a vast crowd of sinful men and women, it surely cannot be at the expense of His justice. Someone must pay the price and satisfy God’s justice and His righteous anger against sin.

In the Scriptures we have the concept of the mediator, one who might fill up the gap between the outraged holiness of God and rebellious man (Isaiah 59:2). Job complained, “For He is not a man, as I am, that I should answer Him, and that we should go to court together. Nor is there any mediator between us who may lay his hand on us both.” But mediation requires a satisfaction to be made to the offended party. We see this is the book of Philemon. Here we have an offended party, Philemon, whose servant has run away from him, perhaps stealing some goods as he went; an offending party, Onesimus, and Paul who is attempting to mediate between them. Onesimus needs to return to his master, but fears the sanctions that may be imposed upon him if he does so. Paul takes these sanctions upon himself: ‘But if he has wronged you or owes anything, put that on my account. I, Paul, am writing with my own hand. I will repay…..’ (Philemon 18-19). Whatever is wanting to propitiate Philemon’s anger against his servant and to effect reconciliation, Paul the mediator willingly provides. In the same way, the Lord Jesus has become a Mediator between men and God (1 Timothy 2:5).

In 2 Corinthians 5:19, we learn that God does not impute trespasses against His people; in Christ; He has reconciled the world [believing Jew and Gentile alike] to Himself. How has He done this? Through the Mediator Jesus Christ. For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us….’ (v.21). The Lord Jesus has taken our sins upon Himself and made satisfaction to God for them. Therefore the message of reconciliation can be preached to all.

A similar concept is that of a surety. This is someone who guarantees the debts of a friend and must pay them in full if the friend defaults. There are several warnings in the Book of Proverbs against becoming a surety (Proverbs 6:1-5; 11:15; 17:18), since one is making the debts of one’s friend effectively one’s own, yet we read in Hebrews 7:22, ‘By so much more Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant.’

Indeed it is, and He is, but only because God executed judgement on Christ 'made sin for us.' Christ was made the very epitome of sin, all the sin's of God's people being imputed to Him (Isalah 53:6). He took our guilt and shame and God punished Him, the guilty One by imputation, for them, so that we, the truly guilty, might be considered wholly righteous. 'The chastisement for our peace was upon Him.'.

Psalm 69 is a messianic psalm, quoted with reference to Christ in the N.T. (vs 9 & 20-21; cf. also vs. 8 & 22). There He declares, "My sins are not hidden from You' (v.5). He made our sins His own and bore them, and the shame and punishment of them, on our behalf.

First, you are taking 2 Timothy 2:13 out of context. Here is the fuller text:

2 Timothy 2:8-13 Remember Jesus Christ, raised from the dead, descended from David. This is my gospel,for which I am suffering even to the point of being chained like a criminal. But God's word is not chained. Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they too may obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, with eternal glory. Here is a trustworthy saying: If we died with him, we will also live with him; if we endure, we will also reign with him. If we disown him, he will also disown us; if we are faithless, he will remain faithful, for he cannot disown himself.

God is God. And this is God being just and the justifier of sinners. They are in Christ – to deny those in Him is to deny Himself. This is a truth some need to learn when speaking of other churches.

What is our first glimpse at the Atonement? It is Genesis 3:15 as it is foretold that Jesus would crush the head of the serpent. What is the first Christian sermon ever preached? It is Acts 2:32-36 where all God’s enemies are made a “footstool”.

We do not need a Savior to take away our punishment. We need a Savior who would deliver us from our sin. God cannot condemn the righteous….period. Which disproves your theory. God cannot justify the wicked. Period. God’s work of salvation is not one that spares us the consequences of sin but that which spares us the wrath to come, which is decisively Christ-centered. The “old man” in us, the sinner, will die. Our bodies will die. But out of this we have a hope in the resurrection because in this life God recreates us.

Do you not know that God will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean. He will give you a new heart and a new spirit. He will put His Spirit in you. Salvation is recreation. We are made new creatures in Christ – no longer bound by the law, no longer condemned by the law.

Stop looking to hold on to that old man. He must die. We must die to the flesh, take up our crosses daily and follow Him. This is life because in Him is life and a life of abundance. Christ did not die to spare us this death, but rather that in dying to the flesh we would live in Him.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your 'exposition' of 1 Tim. 2:13 is almost exactly the opposite of what the verse means, but I don't have time to disappear down that rabbit hole.
We do not need a Saviour to take away our punishment.
I think you'll find we do, and praise God, we have one. 'The chastisement that brought us peace was upon Him.' 'He Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree.'
We need a Saviour who would deliver us from our sin.
Which, of course, Christ has gloriously done by taking our sins upon Himself and paying the penalty for them. 'By His wounds we are healed.'
God cannot condemn the righteous….period. Which disproves your theory. God cannot justify the wicked. Period.
Which is why God 'made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.' It doesn't disprove the truth of PSA, it establishes it. He became sin for us and was condemned; we are credited with His perfect righteousness and pardoned.
God’s work of salvation is not one that spares us the consequences of sin but that which spares us the wrath to come, which is decisively Christ-centred.
God's work of salvation gives us perfect positional sanctification in Christ, adopts us into His family and gives us new birth so that we are no longer slaves to sin. All this happens now, not when we die.
The “old man” in us, the sinner, will die. Our bodies will die. But out of this we have a hope in the resurrection because in this life God recreates us.
I have news for you: 'Knowing this, that our old man was crucified [past tense, not future] with Christ.'
Stop looking to hold on to that old man. He must die.
:Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao Stop it! You're killing me! One of us is holding on to the old man, but it isn't I. It's the person who thinks the old man must die when he's dead already!
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I have news for you: 'Knowing this, that our old man was crucified [past tense, not future] with Christ.'

:Roflmao:Roflmao Stop it! You're killing me! One of us is holding on to the old man, but it isn't I. It's the person who thinks the old man must die when he's dead already!
And He was saying to them all, "If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross daily and follow Me.

that, in reference to your former manner of life, you lay aside the old self, which is being corrupted in accordance with the lusts of deceit, and that you be renewed in the spirit of your mind, and put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth

Again, brother, your "mastery" of the Scripture by taking one verse out to "prove" your point has left you empty handed. Here is the fuller context:

Romans 6:1-14 What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it? Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin; for he who has died is freed from sin. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, knowing that Christ, having been raised from the dead, is never to die again; death no longer is master over Him. For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God. Even so consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus.Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts, and do not go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace.

Until one understands that following Christ means denying ones self and taking up their cross daily it is impossible that they do so. Until one believes they must, as John Owen put it, "be killing sin" in their lives, they simply will not. One of the most horrible side effects of your theory is this "easy believism" in a salvation that expects absolutely nothing from the saved.

You cannot simply take one verse out of context (as you did with both Romans 6 and 2 Timothy) and twist it into your theory. You do this on with the idea that anything you say can be viewed as "implied" in Scripture but God's Word does not work that way. It is not as subjective as you think. Read FROM the Bible, not into it.

The choicest believers, who are assuredly freed from the condemning power of sin, ought yet to make it their business all their days to mortify the indwelling power of sin. - Owen
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That is true, but of course that was only after He had borne our punishment.

The point was, to Jon; it was not God that condemned the Righteous One, as he supposed you meant. It was the Serpent (Genesis 3:15) acting through his offspring (John 8:44) that condemned Him.
 
Last edited:

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The point was, to Jon; it was not God that condemned the Righteous One, as he supposed you meant. It was the Serpent (Genesis 3:15) acting through his offspring (John 8:44) that condemned Him.
I did not mean that God condemned the Righteous One. That was @Martin Marprelate , @The Biblicist , and @Yeshua1 's view (that Christ took upon Himself our sins and God condemned Him in our stead). My view is that it was God's predetermined plan that Christ suffer and die at the hands of godless men, experiencing the wrath due mankind - the wages of sin - and being raised on the third day. (I view Christ as the "Last Adam", the Firstborn of many breathern, of representing those reborn).
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. It was ordained before the Fall, not as a reaction to Adam's sin. When we start to view God as reactionary, as if His plans have been defeated so He must devise an alternate course of action, we have to stop and look again at our theories. Christ is the Lamb slain from the foundations of the world.

I believe that on the Cross the Father looked upon His Son as His beloved, His Holy One, in Whom He is well pleased; His righteous Son in obedience taking upon Himself the sin of mankind and bearing this sin in His flesh.

I do not believe that God was wrathful to Jesus, but rather that the Father offered His Son as a propitiation for us.
The Cross of Christ was already planned to happen before the fall even happened, that is true, but the wrath of God was venting upon Jesus in order to meet the obligations of the Holiness of God being violated, as He needs to have that moral obligation meet and provided for lost sinners in order to save them!
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The Cross of Christ was already planned to happen before the fall even happened, that is true, but the wrath of God was venting upon Jesus in order to meet the obligations of the Holiness of God being violated, as He needs to have that moral obligation meet and provided for lost sinners in order to save them!
I do not think God can sustain such an injury to his nature that would be called a "need". If He could (which I believe impossible), I don't think that such an injury could be inflicted by mere men.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In the view presented by the OP there is simply no reason for Christ to die. A suicidal display would make Christ mentally unstable, not loving.

Christ's death is a loving act only if it was necessary. The OP gives us no reason for Christ's death other than the Father decided that it was a good idea. This provokes no worship of Christ.

Once we see that Christ died as our substitute and that He bore the wrath of the Father that we know we deserve, then we respond with praise and thanksgiving.
God must punish and judge all sin in His creation, due to being Holy, and someone has to take that wrath.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not see such problems with Scripture. Through Adam's transgression sin and death entered the world. Christ came to break the power of Satan and to liberate us from the bondage of sin and death - to free us from the law of sin so that we would live to the law of God. Christ came in the likeness of sinful flesh, took upon Himself all it is to be human. By the predetermined plan of God, Christ suffered under the power of sin and death (He died at the hands of godless men). God vindicated Him by raising Him from the grave and the Christian hope is in this resurrection.
God the father placed Jesus upon the Cross, correct?
He was the direct cause...
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wonderful! How did Christ break the power of Satan and liberate us from the bondage of sin and death? On what legal basis did He do so? If God will not clear the guilty (Exodus 34:7) or justify the wicked (Proverbs 17:15), how does Christ coming in the flesh and dying on the cross change that situation?
Jesus just dieing as a perfect man would not allow God to freely forgive us. Jesus perfect life qualified Him to die in our stead, but he also had to partake of the same wrath and judgement all of us would at throne of God apart from him.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
God the father placed Jesus upon the Cross, correct?
He was the direct cause...
It was God's will, but no. Jesus lay down his own life by allowing men to place Jesus upon the cross. The Jews gave him over to the Romans, they beat Him and sought to release Him. The Jews insisted he be crucified and the Roman soldiers placed him on the cross. A soldier pierced his side. He was dead and Nicodemus with Joseph prepared the body and placed him in a tomb. This is basic Christianity, brother.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I did not mean that God condemned the Righteous One. That was @Martin Marprelate , @The Biblicist , and @Yeshua1 's view (that Christ took upon Himself our sins and God condemned Him in our stead). My view is that it was God's predetermined plan that Christ suffer and die at the hands of godless men, experiencing the wrath due mankind - the wages of sin - and being raised on the third day. (I view Christ as the "Last Adam", the Firstborn of many breathern, of representing those reborn).
Jesus experienced the same treatment by God as all sinners will in the judgement for their sins, as he was without sin, and yet also died in our place as bearing our sins!
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Jesus experienced the same treatment by God as all sinners will in the judgement for their sins, as he was without sin, and yet also died in our place as bearing our sins!
The op is my stated belief (which you are not interacting with, but rather imposing your own view). I never said that Jesus experienced the same treatment by God as all sinners will in the Judgment. That contradicts Scripture. I said that Christ bore our sins. Not that God was wrathful towards Him but that took upon Himself the sin of man, faced those consequences, and rose again on the third day.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jesus was cursed and smitten of God for our sake, as cursed is the one hung upon the tree, correct?
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
If you reread my post you'll see this is what I wrote, or meant.
Ah....I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I believe that God predetermined that Christ would die at the hands of godless men, so we may disagree on that point. I don't view God as being wrathful to Christ but instead Christ taking upon Himself all that would be wrath to mankind.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well let me put it Biblically again to you, JonC. How do the life, death and resurrection of Christ 'establish the law'? How do you square Romans 3:21 with Romans 3:31? How do they enable God to be 'just and the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus'? [I rather think I may have quoted this last Scripture to you several times :Rolleyes] If you would stop dodging the issue ands seek a biblical basis rather than an emotional response and understand that God is the 'righteous Judge' and not Santa Claus in the sky, we might get somewhere.

To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

I believe that God is the just and justifier in that he sent his Son through woman who died and whom the Father then raised from the dead.

V 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested. Exactly when was it manifested? Was it not through the death and resurrection? V 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: I believe redemption and grace there is the death and resurrection.

I believe the same thing is seen in Gal 3.
Esp in; Before the coming of the faith
And
The faith having come.

I believe the Christ, giving his life a ransom and the Father to grace, raising him from the dead is:

The substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen.

Faith

The righteousness of God apart from the law.

The circumcision, by faith
The uncircumcision through the faith.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I did not mean that God condemned the Righteous One. That was @Martin Marprelate , @The Biblicist , and @Yeshua1 's view (that Christ took upon Himself our sins and God condemned Him in our stead). My view is that it was God's predetermined plan that Christ suffer and die at the hands of godless men, experiencing the wrath due mankind - the wages of sin - and being raised on the third day. (I view Christ as the "Last Adam", the Firstborn of many breathern, of representing those reborn).
So God condemned the Christ without making Him sin (contra 2 Corinthians 5:21) and had Him done to death at second hand. I don't see how that avoids Him condemning the righteous.
 

Rebel1

Active Member
The difference in atonement views is due largely to how people at the time the views were formed viewed God and His character. The early church viewed God as a physician working in a hospital; in the middle ages, God was viewed as a feudal lord who was due satisfaction. In the 16th century, God was viewed as a stern judge in a courtroom. These views produced three distinct atonement theories. I know which one I hold to and why.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top