The Angel of the South
New Member
Am I right that the unforgivable sin (why it's unforgivable) can be explained as a simple logical argument?
I have been taught that the unforgivable sin is for an unbeliever to deny Jesus Christ by resisting the conviction the Holy Spirit gives him. If you do this--resist your conviction to repent and receive Christ as Lord and Savior--then by definition your sin is not forgiven, because it won't be forgiven without Christ. It becomes seemingly a tautology: if you will not have your sin forgiven, your sin will not be forgiven. That's why the sin is called unforgivable: resisting the conviction to repent is a sin that leads to your sins not being forgiven.
And isn't it obviously a sin that only unbelievers can commit?
I have been taught that the unforgivable sin is for an unbeliever to deny Jesus Christ by resisting the conviction the Holy Spirit gives him. If you do this--resist your conviction to repent and receive Christ as Lord and Savior--then by definition your sin is not forgiven, because it won't be forgiven without Christ. It becomes seemingly a tautology: if you will not have your sin forgiven, your sin will not be forgiven. That's why the sin is called unforgivable: resisting the conviction to repent is a sin that leads to your sins not being forgiven.
And isn't it obviously a sin that only unbelievers can commit?