Alan Gross
Well-Known Member
"the church-at-large" isn't something that I have seen in The Bible. Of course, I haven't seen, "I came from a monkey" in the Bible, but a lot of people say that that is something they assume to exist as possible.
What happens if it were possible for them to not assume, in their case, "I came from a monkey"?
Without that assumption, there is nothing to present as evidence. Why? Because it is not possible. God Created the Heaven and Earth and monkeys and you and me.
It is actually, SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to DREAM of 'some evidence' being available, for 'some other theory', to account for our being here. AND THERE IS NONE.
I know what you're thinking when you present this idea, as if it may just appear out of nowhere, however, I HAVE NOT SEEN IT in The Bible. And I might as well say, "you haven't either". There. We agree. There is No Controversy before the court, your honor. ( I'd be nice if we could get along and Preach Jesus is The Savior, wouldn't it?)
The usage of words includes such expressions as, "The husband is the head of the wife", to NOT MEAN 'there is a Giant Husband that is the head of EVERY WIFE THAT EXISTS'.
Drop the 'the' in front of 'husband' and wife' and we may arrive at, 'husbands are the head of the wives'.
Thus, no 'generic' structuring has us looking out for a Giant husband.
'The body', or 'the church' is EXACTLY THE SAME LANGUAGE USAGE.
'Bodies' and 'churches' is expressed, intended, revealed, inspired, interpreted, and may be understood, in each and every Bible usage, WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
I can't personally go from, "However, the church is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph. 2:20),"
to:
"so they have passed the mandate of the Great Commission on to the church-at-large."
Specifically, I can't personally go there, because the 'called out assembly' or the 'church'-at-large doesn't happen anywhere, any more than anyone came from a monkey.
They sure 'think' with a sin-cursed, carnal mind, they are 'reasoning with', that THEY DID, though. Ask them on Facebook. They ALL DO, practically.
People need the Lord.
And that's O.K. We're putting Him Out there!!
What happens if it were possible for them to not assume, in their case, "I came from a monkey"?
Without that assumption, there is nothing to present as evidence. Why? Because it is not possible. God Created the Heaven and Earth and monkeys and you and me.
It is actually, SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to DREAM of 'some evidence' being available, for 'some other theory', to account for our being here. AND THERE IS NONE.
I know what you're thinking when you present this idea, as if it may just appear out of nowhere, however, I HAVE NOT SEEN IT in The Bible. And I might as well say, "you haven't either". There. We agree. There is No Controversy before the court, your honor. ( I'd be nice if we could get along and Preach Jesus is The Savior, wouldn't it?)
The usage of words includes such expressions as, "The husband is the head of the wife", to NOT MEAN 'there is a Giant Husband that is the head of EVERY WIFE THAT EXISTS'.
Drop the 'the' in front of 'husband' and wife' and we may arrive at, 'husbands are the head of the wives'.
Thus, no 'generic' structuring has us looking out for a Giant husband.
'The body', or 'the church' is EXACTLY THE SAME LANGUAGE USAGE.
'Bodies' and 'churches' is expressed, intended, revealed, inspired, interpreted, and may be understood, in each and every Bible usage, WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
I can't personally go from, "However, the church is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph. 2:20),"
to:
"so they have passed the mandate of the Great Commission on to the church-at-large."
Specifically, I can't personally go there, because the 'called out assembly' or the 'church'-at-large doesn't happen anywhere, any more than anyone came from a monkey.
They sure 'think' with a sin-cursed, carnal mind, they are 'reasoning with', that THEY DID, though. Ask them on Facebook. They ALL DO, practically.
People need the Lord.
And that's O.K. We're putting Him Out there!!