• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

I Will Build My Church

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
I Will Build My Church: Ekklēsia - ἐκκλησία - Church

People often overlook what the word for Church is and what it means. When Christ said, “I will build my church” in Matthew 16:18, He did not introduce a new religious term or coin a fresh theological label. Instead, He took a familiar civic word, ἐκκλησία, ekklēsia, which always means an assembly of people called out and gathered, and He claimed it as His own. In ordinary Greek usage, an ekklēsia was never an abstract idea. It was always a body of people summoned, gathered in a place, and convened for a purpose. The word carried the concrete sense of an assembly, not a mystical or invisible entity. It was never an invisible universal assembly, which would be a contradiction in terms.

Before Christ used the word ἐκκλησία, it belonged almost entirely to the civic world. In Greek cities, an ekklēsia was the gathering of citizens called out to deliberate, vote, or act on public matters. It was the city’s official assembly, summoned by a herald, convened in a particular place, and empowered to make decisions. The term did not carry religious meaning. It did not describe a synagogue, a worshiping body, or a spiritual community. It was simply the civic assembly of a town or city, the ancient equivalent of a city council meeting, but with the full body of citizens present. This usage appears clearly in Acts 19:32, Acts 19:39, and Acts 19:41, where the same word refers to a riotous mob, a lawful civic gathering, and the regular city assembly.

“Some therefore cried one thing, and some another, for the assembly was confused, and the more part knew not wherefore they were come together.” Acts 19:32

“But if ye enquire any thing concerning other matters, it shall be determined in a lawful assembly.” Acts 19:39

“And when he had thus spoken, he dismissed the assembly.” Acts 19:41

This background matters because Jesus deliberately chose a word that already had a clear, concrete meaning. He did not select a mystical term or a religious label. He took the familiar civic idea of citizens being called out and gathered, and He claimed it for Himself. When He said, “I will build my church,” He took a word that meant assembly and stamped it with His ownership and His purpose. The form of the word remained the same. The substance was transformed. His people would be the ones He calls, gathers, and assembles. The future tense in Matthew 16:18 shows that His ekklēsia did not yet exist. He would build it.

The pre‑Christian usage therefore reinforces the point. An ekklēsia was always an actual assembly. It was never an invisible abstraction. It was never a scattered, unassembled body. It was a gathering of people in a place, convened for a purpose. Christ took that concrete civic term and elevated it to describe the redeemed people He would call out and assemble. The calling is spiritual, but the assembly remains literal. The present manifestation of His ekklēsia is local and visible, and the future universal assembly awaits the moment when all His people are gathered together in His presence. Hebrews 12:22-23 speaks of the general assembly and church of the firstborn, a gathering that is future and heavenly, not present and earthly.

"But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,"


If ekklēsia means assembly, and it does, then Christ’s ekklēsia must be an assembly. A universal assembly cannot exist until all believers are actually gathered together. The present manifestation of Christ’s church is therefore local, visible, and assembled. The future universal assembly will occur only when all the redeemed are gathered in one place at His coming. The New Testament never abandons this concrete meaning. It simply sanctifies it when Christ claims the term.

In Closing

Christ did not redefine the word ekklēsia. He reclaimed it. He took a familiar civic assembly and made it the gathering of His redeemed people. The meaning of the word never changed. What changed was the One who now calls, gathers, and builds. The church is His assembly, formed by His call, founded on His authority, and gathered to His name. When believers meet as a local body, they are not inventing something new. They are simply living out what the word has always meant and what the Lord Himself declared He would build. The final and perfect assembly awaits His coming, when all His people will be gathered together in His presence. Until that day, every faithful local church stands as a visible testimony that His promise in Matthew 16:18 is being fulfilled.

~Tony

© A.K. Pritchard 2026 -

Free to use with proper attribution.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
I Will Build My Church: Ekklēsia - ἐκκλησία - Church

People often overlook what the word for Church is and what it means. When Christ said, “I will build my church” in Matthew 16:18, He did not introduce a new religious term or coin a fresh theological label. Instead, He took a familiar civic word, ἐκκλησία, ekklēsia, which always means an assembly of people called out and gathered, and He claimed it as His own. In ordinary Greek usage, an ekklēsia was never an abstract idea. It was always a body of people summoned, gathered in a place, and convened for a purpose. The word carried the concrete sense of an assembly, not a mystical or invisible entity. It was never an invisible universal assembly, which would be a contradiction in terms.

Before Christ used the word ἐκκλησία, it belonged almost entirely to the civic world. In Greek cities, an ekklēsia was the gathering of citizens called out to deliberate, vote, or act on public matters. It was the city’s official assembly, summoned by a herald, convened in a particular place, and empowered to make decisions. The term did not carry religious meaning. It did not describe a synagogue, a worshiping body, or a spiritual community. It was simply the civic assembly of a town or city, the ancient equivalent of a city council meeting, but with the full body of citizens present. This usage appears clearly in Acts 19:32, Acts 19:39, and Acts 19:41, where the same word refers to a riotous mob, a lawful civic gathering, and the regular city assembly.

“Some therefore cried one thing, and some another, for the assembly was confused, and the more part knew not wherefore they were come together.” Acts 19:32

“But if ye enquire any thing concerning other matters, it shall be determined in a lawful assembly.” Acts 19:39

“And when he had thus spoken, he dismissed the assembly.” Acts 19:41

This background matters because Jesus deliberately chose a word that already had a clear, concrete meaning. He did not select a mystical term or a religious label. He took the familiar civic idea of citizens being called out and gathered, and He claimed it for Himself. When He said, “I will build my church,” He took a word that meant assembly and stamped it with His ownership and His purpose. The form of the word remained the same. The substance was transformed. His people would be the ones He calls, gathers, and assembles. The future tense in Matthew 16:18 shows that His ekklēsia did not yet exist. He would build it.

The pre‑Christian usage therefore reinforces the point. An ekklēsia was always an actual assembly. It was never an invisible abstraction. It was never a scattered, unassembled body. It was a gathering of people in a place, convened for a purpose. Christ took that concrete civic term and elevated it to describe the redeemed people He would call out and assemble. The calling is spiritual, but the assembly remains literal. The present manifestation of His ekklēsia is local and visible, and the future universal assembly awaits the moment when all His people are gathered together in His presence. Hebrews 12:22-23 speaks of the general assembly and church of the firstborn, a gathering that is future and heavenly, not present and earthly.

"But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,"


If ekklēsia means assembly, and it does, then Christ’s ekklēsia must be an assembly. A universal assembly cannot exist until all believers are actually gathered together. The present manifestation of Christ’s church is therefore local, visible, and assembled. The future universal assembly will occur only when all the redeemed are gathered in one place at His coming. The New Testament never abandons this concrete meaning. It simply sanctifies it when Christ claims the term.
If Jesus was speaking of specific local assemblies, He should have said, “I will build my churches” plural.

But actually He was speaking of building the universal, collective church, which would exist in various locations.

He said “church” singular, thus embracing the totality of all local assemblies.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
If Jesus was speaking of specific local assemblies, He should have said, “I will build my churches” plural.

But actually He was speaking of building the universal, collective church, which would exist in various locations.

He said “church” singular, thus embracing the totality of all local assemblies.
The Road. The Car. The Store. The Bank. Singular nouns can and do describe an institution. The very use of the word ekklēsia carries the day for local church assemblies.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think there needs to be agreement on what is a Christian before asking what is a church.
I wrote these a long time ago, but I think I still agree with myself!
What is a Church? I think they are a bit long to cut and paste here.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
I think there needs to be agreement on what is a Christian before asking what is a church.
Huh? The meaning of ekklēsia is the starting point. It literally means assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. Definitions of “Christian” are important, but they don’t change the lexical reality. The present church is local and assembled; the universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles, a future event.
 

Wesley Briggman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A Christian is:

2Th 2:13 KJV: But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
Huh? The meaning of ekklēsia is the starting point. It literally means assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. Definitions of “Christian” are important, but they don’t change the lexical reality. The present church is local and assembled; the universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles, a future event.
The universal called out ones already exists and is referred to in the New Testament.

When Jesus said He will build His church, He could not have been referring to just one local assembly. He spoke of the entire body of believers.

The Greek ekklesia is the basis for our English words ecclesiastical (“pertaining to the church”) and ecclesiology (“the study of doctrine concerning the church”).

The phrase “the Body of Christ” is a common New Testament metaphor for the Church (all those who are truly saved). The Church is called “one body in Christ” in Romans 12:5, “one body” in 1 Corinthians 10:17, “the body of Christ” in 1 Corinthians 12:27 and Ephesians 4:12, and “the body” in Hebrews 13:3.

The Church in its universal entirety is clearly equated with “the body” of Christ in Ephesians 5:23 and Colossians 1:24.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Huh? The meaning of ekklēsia is the starting point. It literally means assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. Definitions of “Christian” are important, but they don’t change the lexical reality. The present church is local and assembled; the universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles, a future event.
If the church is an assembly of Christians it seems sensible to me to ask what a Christian is before proceeding further.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
The universal called out ones already exists and is referred to in the New Testament.

When Jesus said He will build His church, He could not have been referring to just one local assembly. He spoke of the entire body of believers.

The Greek ekklesia is the basis for our English words ecclesiastical (“pertaining to the church”) and ecclesiology (“the study of doctrine concerning the church”).

The phrase “the Body of Christ” is a common New Testament metaphor for the Church (all those who are truly saved). The Church is called “one body in Christ” in Romans 12:5, “one body” in 1 Corinthians 10:17, “the body of Christ” in 1 Corinthians 12:27 and Ephesians 4:12, and “the body” in Hebrews 13:3.

The Church in its universal entirety is clearly equated with “the body” of Christ in Ephesians 5:23 and Colossians 1:24.
The “called‑out ones” may exist as a spiritual reality, but ekklēsia does not only mean “called‑out ones.” It means a called‑out “assembly.” The New Testament uses it that way consistently. Metaphors like “body of Christ” do not redefine the literal meaning of ekklēsia. The universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles, Hebrews 12:22–23, a future event. Present‑tense usage remains local, visible, and gathered.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
If the church is an assembly of Christians it seems sensible to me to ask what a Christian is before proceeding further.
We can define “Christian,” but that does not determine the meaning of ekklēsia. The word itself means a called‑out assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. The lexical meaning is the starting point, not the definition of Christian. We should stay on topic of the thread. Defining Christian is an interesting topic though, for another thread perhaps.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
οἰκοδομήσω my church

I am interested in that word.

How was that done?

What was the very beginning of that process?

Was it the laying of a rejected stone? What stone? When was it laid? Who laid that stone?
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
οἰκοδομήσω my church

I am interested in that word.

How was that done?

What was the very beginning of that process?

Was it the laying of a rejected stone? What stone? When was it laid? Who laid that stone?
The verb οἰκοδομήσω (“I will build”) in Matthew 16:18 is not architectural in the sense of laying stones. In the New Testament it is used for forming, establishing, and building up a people, not constructing a physical structure. Christ is describing the creation of His assembly, His ekklēsia, that being His Church, not the laying of literal stones.

The process of building began in Luke 6:13: “And when it was day, he called unto him his disciples: and of them he chose twelve, whom also he named apostles.” This calling, choosing, and constituting of His disciples is the first act of building His Church. He formed them, taught them, organized them, and entrusted them with the mission. This is the building work the verb describes.

Christ is the chief cornerstone of the Church He built. Scripture presents Him as the stone rejected by Israel but chosen and exalted by God, the defining and aligning stone of the entire structure. The Church does not exist apart from Him, and it cannot be measured, ordered, or sustained without Him. He is the foundation of our faith, the standard of measure, and the point from which every part of the building takes its alignment.
 

360watt

Member
Site Supporter
Jesus says He will build His church in Mathew 16:18.. then in Matthew 18, refers to a church that can be spoken to, with a process for church discipline.

Would He start with something entirely different to what He refers to later?
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
Jesus says He will build His church in Mathew 16:18.. then in Matthew 18, refers to a church that can be spoken to, with a process for church discipline.

Would He start with something entirely different to what He refers to later?
Christ was not improvising in Matthew 18. He was establishing the disciplinary structure that His assemblies would follow throughout the entire age until the Great Gathering of Hebrews 12:22–23. The future tense of Matthew 16:18 (“I will build my church”) declares the certainty of what He will accomplish; Matthew 18 shows Him laying the operational groundwork for that very church as He forms and instructs His disciples.

There is no contradiction and no gap. There is continuity of purpose:

  • He calls disciples (Luke 6:13).
  • He forms them into an assembly.
  • He gives them authority.
  • He gives them discipline.
  • He gives them ordinances.
  • He gives them commission.
  • He gives them the Spirit.
  • He builds His church.
  • He preserves it until the Great Gathering.
Matthew 18 is not a different “church.” It is Christ setting the pattern that His church will follow until the end of the age.
 

360watt

Member
Site Supporter
Christ was not improvising in Matthew 18. He was establishing the disciplinary structure that His assemblies would follow throughout the entire age until the Great Gathering of Hebrews 12:22–23. The future tense of Matthew 16:18 (“I will build my church”) declares the certainty of what He will accomplish; Matthew 18 shows Him laying the operational groundwork for that very church as He forms and instructs His disciples.

There is no contradiction and no gap. There is continuity of purpose:

  • He calls disciples (Luke 6:13).
  • He forms them into an assembly.
  • He gives them authority.
  • He gives them discipline.
  • He gives them ordinances.
  • He gives them commission.
  • He gives them the Spirit.
  • He builds His church.
  • He preserves it until the Great Gathering.
Matthew 18 is not a different “church.” It is Christ setting the pattern that His church will follow until the end of the age.
Yeah, Mathew 16:18, and Matthew 18 church discipline... are the same church type. Local and visible.

Like you showed in the earlier post: Mathew 16:18 is as the institutional sense of church. For eg . 'The horse, the bar, the dog, the cat'

Singular standing for plural:)

Mathew 18.. as the particular local assembly in question.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The verb οἰκοδομήσω (“I will build”) in Matthew 16:18 is not architectural in the sense of laying stones. In the New Testament it is used for forming, establishing, and building up a people, not constructing a physical structure. Christ is describing the creation of His assembly, His ekklēsia, that being His Church, not the laying of literal stones.

The process of building began in Luke 6:13: “And when it was day, he called unto him his disciples: and of them he chose twelve, whom also he named apostles.” This calling, choosing, and constituting of His disciples is the first act of building His Church. He formed them, taught them, organized them, and entrusted them with the mission. This is the building work the verb describes.

Christ is the chief cornerstone of the Church He built. Scripture presents Him as the stone rejected by Israel but chosen and exalted by God, the defining and aligning stone of the entire structure. The Church does not exist apart from Him, and it cannot be measured, ordered, or sustained without Him. He is the foundation of our faith, the standard of measure, and the point from which every part of the building takes its alignment.

How was he, "exalted by God"?

Can that exaltation be seen in the following? For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: 1 Peter 3:18 - But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. Rom 8:11 -

In reality was the first stone of the church laid when by his Spirit, God the Father raised Jesus from the dead? Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:10,11

Is the following verse relative? “Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
How was he, "exalted by God"?

Can that exaltation be seen in the following? For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: 1 Peter 3:18 - But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. Rom 8:11 -

In reality was the first stone of the church laid when by his Spirit, God the Father raised Jesus from the dead? Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:10,11

Is the following verse relative? “Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear.
Christ’s exaltation is indeed the Father’s vindication of the Son, but Scripture does not place the beginning of the Church at the resurrection. The verb οἰκοδομήσω in Matthew 16:18 refers to forming and establishing a people, not laying a literal cornerstone. Christ began building His assembly during His earthly ministry when He called His disciples and chose the twelve (Luke 6:13).

Acts 4:11 identifies Christ Himself as the cornerstone, not the resurrection event. The cornerstone is a person, not a moment. His exaltation declares His glory, but the building began when He constituted His disciples as an assembly. That is the first act of the building Christ promised.
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
Christ’s exaltation is indeed the Father’s vindication of the Son, but Scripture does not place the beginning of the Church at the resurrection. The verb οἰκοδομήσω in Matthew 16:18 refers to forming and establishing a people, not laying a literal cornerstone. Christ began building His assembly during His earthly ministry when He called His disciples and chose the twelve (Luke 6:13).

Acts 4:11 identifies Christ Himself as the cornerstone, not the resurrection event. The cornerstone is a person, not a moment. His exaltation declares His glory, but the building began when He constituted His disciples as an assembly. That is the first act of the building Christ promised.
The emphasis on the cornerstone is the nature and the placement. It is buried. It is the beginning of the building. It holds the foundation which holds the building upon which it is built. It is a NEW testament with the emphasis on new. It is for new creatures to dwell in. It is under construction with stones being added.

Col.1:18 says the beginning of the church is at the resurrection of Christ after be was buried. Peter, an apostle, said the beginning was when the Spirit was poured out from heaven and received by believers.

Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

When the gentiles were first given the indwelling Holy Spirit, and salvation through faith in Christ, and Peter said to the Jews in Jerusalem:

Acts 11:14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.
15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them ( gentiles, poured out from heaven), as on us at the beginning.
16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.

Reason and logic and the scriptures says the beginning of the church was when the Spirit was given for the purpose of regeneration. Let us accept that as being the truth and adjust our theology accordingly.

Here is a supporting passage.

Ep 2:18 For through him we both (Jews & gentiles) have access by one Spirit unto the Father.
19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

No possibility of the building until the cornerstone is laid. There might be preparation beforehand but the church depends on the laying of the cornerstone.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
The emphasis on the cornerstone is the nature and the placement. It is buried. It is the beginning of the building. It holds the foundation which holds the building upon which it is built. It is a NEW testament with the emphasis on new. It is for new creatures to dwell in. It is under construction with stones being added.

Col.1:18 says the beginning of the church is at the resurrection of Christ after be was buried. Peter, an apostle, said the beginning was when the Spirit was poured out from heaven and received by believers.

Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

When the gentiles were first given the indwelling Holy Spirit, and salvation through faith in Christ, and Peter said to the Jews in Jerusalem:

Acts 11:14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.
15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them ( gentiles, poured out from heaven), as on us at the beginning.
16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.

Reason and logic and the scriptures says the beginning of the church was when the Spirit was given for the purpose of regeneration. Let us accept that as being the truth and adjust our theology accordingly.

Here is a supporting passage.

Ep 2:18 For through him we both (Jews & gentiles) have access by one Spirit unto the Father.
19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

No possibility of the building until the cornerstone is laid. There might be preparation beforehand but the church depends on the laying of the cornerstone.
Acts 4:11 identifies Christ Himself as the cornerstone, not the resurrection event. The cornerstone is a person, not a moment. Colossians 1:18 says Christ is the beginning because He is preeminent, not because the church began at the resurrection. Acts 11:15 refers to the beginning of Gentile inclusion, not the beginning of the church. Christ began building His assembly during His earthly ministry when He called His disciples and chose the twelve in Luke 6:13. That is the first act of the building Christ promised in Matthew 16:18. The church does not begin at the resurrection or Pentecost. It begins when Christ constituted His disciples as an assembly.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A church is the people described in Acts 2:41-47. They have gladly received the word of God, been baptized, and now they meet together, learning more of the faith, joining together in the Lord’s supper and in prayer, looking to each other’s needs, having joy in their hearts and praising God together.

A church is the people described in 1 Cor 1:2-8. They have been set apart in Christ, called in holiness, have received undeserved favour and peace from God; their knowledge of God and their witness to Him comes from the Holy Spirit, who has given them corporately all the gifts they need to function as a church, as they eagerly await the return of their Lord who will preserve them in Him until that day.

In other words, a church is Christians. There is much talk of a ‘visible’ and ‘invisible’ Church, but this finds no support in Scripture. Many commentators have tried to import the concept into the Bible, mangling most wretchedly the Parable of the wheat and the tares (Matt 13:24-30 ) by claiming that the field represents the ‘visible’ Church. It does not! Our Lord has given us the interpretation of that parable, and ‘The field is the world’ (Matt 13:38 ). The Church, as we have seen, is made up of Christians.

That there will be those who join a church but are later found not to be Christians is admitted. Jude writes, ‘For certain men have crept in unnoticed’ (Jude 4 ). Those who prove themselves not to be Christians, whether by their behaviour or their doctrines are to be put out of the church (1 Cor 5:13; Titus 3:10 ). Discipline is an integral part of a true church. Initially it is aimed at producing repentance (2 Cor 2:6-11 ), but if that is not forthcoming then exclusion is made permanent, because unbelievers are no part of the Church of Christ (cf. 1 John 2:19 ). We are instructed (2 Cor 6:14-17 ), ‘Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of the Lord with idols?………Therefore, “Come out from among them and be separate,” says the Lord. “Do not touch what is unclean and I will receive you.”’ There are two sorts of men in the world- those who ‘walk according to the flesh’ and those who ‘live according to the Spirit.’ How can these two sorts of men enjoy spiritual unity? It is impossible. We may and should invite our unbelieving neighbours to attend church services so that they may hear the word preached (1 Cor 14:24-25 ), but we must not knowingly tolerate unbelievers within the church membership.

The Lord Jesus is continuing to build her even at this present time (Eph 2:21-22 ); she is His Church, His bride; He has purchased her with His own blood and she is a chaste virgin. As it is written, ‘In that day there shall no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the Lord of Hosts’ (Zech 14:21 ). It is the duty of the leadership of each individual church to seek to make the assembly in its charge as pure as possible (2 Cor 11:2 ).

The Church is composed of those who have come out of the world to join it. They are no longer what they were (Eph 5:8 ). Peter speaks of them as ‘sojourners and pilgrims’ (1 Peter 2:11 ). Paul told the church at Philippi, ‘Our citizenship is in heaven’ (Phil 3:20 ), and to the Colossians he said, ‘[God] has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love’ (Col 1:13 ). The church at Thessalonika had, ‘Turned to God from idols to serve the true and living God’ (1 Thes 1:9 ). They came out of the world and into the Church. Now some will say immediately, “Ah, yes. But this refers to the invisible church. In the visible church there are many who are in the world and in the church at one and the same time.” Perhaps, but as we have seen, this is simply not the language of Scripture. When Paul writes to the church at Colossae, he is addressing, ‘The saints and faithful brethren in Christ’ (1:2 ) He knows nothing of a ‘visible’ or ‘invisible’ church, but only an assembly of true believers. If there were false brethren in the Colossian church, Paul’s letter is not addressed to them. It is true that there are exhortations to the believers to examine themselves (2 Cor 13:5 ), and warnings against falling away (Heb 6:4-8; 10:26-38 ), but the writer to the Hebrews remains confident that the recipients of his letter will remain constant (Heb 6:9; 10:39 ).

From my blog article: What is a Church?
See also: What is a Christian?
 
Top