Zionism Undermines our Gospel
Modern Zionism is a cult that undermines our Christian message. Christians should never espouse it, especially in light of modern events. Some well-meaning ones do, however, under the illusion that…
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So focus on it less and preach the gospel instead if it is offensive to you.Zionism Undermines our Gospel![]()
Zionism Undermines our Gospel
Modern Zionism is a cult that undermines our Christian message. Christians should never espouse it, especially in light of modern events. Some well-meaning ones do, however, under the illusion that…asterisktom.wordpress.com
As soon as I saw the name "Rothschilds" in the article as inventing the term, and the weird idea that Scofield perpetuated Zionism, I knew it was nothing more than a conspiracy theory. (No source is given for either of these assumed facts. It's always a red flag when assumptions are stated as facts.) And then the term "preterist" popped up, and asterisktom is a full preterist (doesn't believe in the Second Coming), so there you have it. Viola (the interjection, not the instrument)! And then, of course, there is the link on the same page touting the myth of the "Gaza Genoc!de" (sic).Zionism Undermines our Gospel![]()
Zionism Undermines our Gospel
Modern Zionism is a cult that undermines our Christian message. Christians should never espouse it, especially in light of modern events. Some well-meaning ones do, however, under the illusion that…asterisktom.wordpress.com

Carter waited way too long to take action against Iran.As soon as I saw the name "Rothschilds" in the article as inventing the term, and the weird idea that Scofield perpetuated Zionism, I knew it was nothing more than a conspiracy theory. (No source is given for either of these assumed facts. It's always a red flag when assumptions are stated as facts.) And then the term "preterist" popped up, and asterisktom is a full preterist (doesn't believe in the Second Coming), so there you have it. Viola (the interjection, not the instrument)! And then, of course, there is the link on the same page touting the myth of the "Gaza Genoc!de" (sic).
The fact remains that our war with Iran is predicated on 1000s of Americans being killed by Iran and their terrorist proxies over the years, not on Zionism. I have always thought Jimmy Carter should have declared war on Iran.
The term "Zionism" was originally about getting Jews back into the land of Israel. (An historical fact that needs no proof to knowledgeable people.) Nowadays Islamists use the word as a way to criticize Israel, and not in line with history.
Right! And even then he sent a very small force, which was a complete failure. I remember all of it well. And as you know, as soon as Reagan was elected--a very tough president--they gave back the hostages. Iran only respects military force.Carter waited way too long to take action against Iran.
A civil war there will only successful if the soldiers within the Republican Guard turn against their leadership. The people are unarmed.Right! And even then he sent a very small force, which was a complete failure. And as you know, as soon as Reagan was elected--a very tough president--they gave back the hostages. Iran only respects military force.
Interesting that now there is civil war beginning in Iran. And it is not the Illuminati fighting!!
What I read is that the RG is fighting the army. They are separate organizations. The army is much larger, and can easily defeat the RG and overthrow the terrorist government if they want to take it that far.A civil war there will only successful if the soldiers within the Republican Guard turn against their leadership. The people are unarmed.
Do you mean right now? I haven't heard of it. Or are you referring to the protests that were so brutally put down a few months ago?Interesting that now there is civil war beginning in Iran.
Happening right now:Do you mean right now? I haven't heard of it. Or are you referring to the protests that were so brutally put down a few months ago?
Can you give a link? I'm not doubting you; I am just unaware of it.
Amen to everything you wrote.Thank you, @John of Japan
I would not wish civil war on anyone. It is the most vile of wars, pitting brother against brother and father against son.
But I do pray for the rapid demise of the vile regime in Iran.
I hate to burst you bubble John. There is The Daily Jargan newspaper in India that is a legitimate news source. The Daily Jagran Youtube channel is not. Look closely at the video. She's standing in front of a green screen. Look behind the "reporter." That is not a newsroom and you don't hear any noise from them at all. Look closely at her and look along the outline of her body. It's a green screen behind her. This channel operates more like an aggregator and entertainment-driven "explainer" channel than a rigorous, professional news operation. They are not doing original reporting. They do not have journalists inside Iran, nor do they have access to classified intelligence. They are reading public internet forums, social media, and OSINT blogs, and then writing a script based on it.Happening right now:. I've seen it elsewhere, but this was my main source. The Artesh (regular army) is apparently fighting the Islamic Guard. The Artesh apparently has 3 times the soldiers, so we'll see what happens.
Thanks for the correction, friend. I'll keep looking.I hate to burst you bubble John. There is The Daily Jargan newspaper in India that is a legitimate news source. The Daily Jagran Youtube channel is not. Look closely at the video. She's standing in front of a green screen. Look behind the "reporter." That is not a newsroom and you don't hear any noise from them at all. Look closely at her and look along the outline of her body. It's a green screen behind her. This channel operates more like an aggregator and entertainment-driven "explainer" channel than a rigorous, professional news operation. They are not doing original reporting. They do not have journalists inside Iran, nor do they have access to classified intelligence. They are reading public internet forums, social media, and OSINT blogs, and then writing a script based on it.
Labeling a structural supply-chain argument as "2 rival armies are destroying Tehran from the inside" is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to generate ad revenue from views.
The friction between the regular army (the Artesh) and the ideological Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps boils down to an engineered imbalance in resources, trust, and ultimate purpose. For over 45 years, the regime's core strategy has been to keep these two military bodies permanently unequal and mutually suspicious so they could never unite against the government.
The IRGC acts as a powerful economic powerhouse in Iran, controlling multi-billion dollar domestic commercial industries, lucrative oil contracts, and strategic weapons like ballistic missiles and drones. They enjoy direct access to top political leadership and receive the highest budget allocations.
The Artesh, by contrast, handles standard, heavy territorial defense but has historically been marginalized, underfunded, and strictly monitored under intense ideological control. The clash between the two comes down to logistics. This is not in any form a civil war brewing in Iran.
If what this channel is reporting were believed to be true by legitimate news sources it would be reported by them. Trump would certainly be talking about it. It's because of channels like this one, that misinformation is dispersed and then people fall for it and believe it's true, post the link, and the channel gets more hits that leads to more revenue.