Recent content by Van

Isaiah 46:10 NASB Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things which have not been done, Saying, ‘My plan will be established, And I will accomplish all My good pleasure’; Here we have a verse that is actually relevant to the question of how God can declare the...

Meaningless twaddle. Everyone knows God is eternal. It is saying I am for motherhood and apple pie. It does not even come close to addressing the issue, so it is just more obfuscation to hide false doctrine. Ditto for God does as He pleases. Of course God does as He pleases. That is not...

Yet another off topic response, a deflection, a change of subject, and so forth. This is all they have, mindless twaddle rather than their studied response from scripture. The OP presents an understanding of Hebrews 10:26-29. Loss of salvation is NOT taught! Failure to fully embrace the...

Once again we see advocates for the dark age fallacy offering mindless twaddle instead of a biblically based response. No one said or suggested the gospel message must be perfect in order for the lost to place their faith and devotion in Christ. So another deflection hoisted to hide the fact...

Once again those holding views from the dark ages offer mindless response to the evidence presented. Post #4 - denial Post #5 - absurd claims without basis in reality Post #6 - Copy and re-post devoid of response Actual biblical response: 1) Did anyone say they had not received "knowledge...

1) Did anyone say they had not received "knowledge of the truth?" Nope so obfuscation 2) Did anyone say they had not be set apart (sanctified) under the New Covenant? Nope so obfuscation 3) Did anyone say they had committed "any old sin?" Nope so obfuscation 4) What was their sin...

1) These advocates of false doctrine change the subject to the meaning of "grace" then deny that was a change of subject. 2) The fact is that born anew believers are to be intolerant of false doctrine. See the OP. 3) No one said or suggested the gospel message must be perfect in order...

More of the same insult posts, no effort to address the topic. Take note all of you who think the alternate view might have a basis in scripture. It does not. Every point except once saved always saved, must be read into scripture. No one seeks God becomes no one ever seeks God, the natural...

This passage follows the Hebrews 10:19-25 passage where we are to live according to our faith and faithfulness to the gospel in which we placed our trust and devotion. Then in our passage the alternate is presented, where people rejected or were not fully committed to the gospel are described...

Yet another "change the subject" post to their opponent's beliefs. This is all they ever offer, defection and absurdity. Scripture says false doctrines matter, but the alternate view denies that reality.

Yet another "change the subject" post to their opponents qualifications. This is all they ever offer, defection and absurdity. Scripture says false doctrines matter, but the alternate view denies that reality.

More claims for fiction, no biblical support offered. Ask yourselves why do the proponents not realize they bought an empty sack? God created time as part of His creation of our universe. That simply does not address Revelation 6:10, where the passage of time exists in the spiritual kingdom...

There doctrines are simply the copy and paste views from the dark ages. I consider them the "Doctrines of Disgrace." They are defended not with rational posts, but with absurdity and insult. For example with total spiritual inability is true, and it is not, then the gospel message would not...

Ecclesiastes 1:9 NASB What has been, it is what will be, And what has been done, it is what will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun. Does this verse suggest the future may be completely predestined? Nope Rather it teaches that the things done by humans in the past will be repeated...

God has mercy of those whose faith He chooses to credit as righteousness, but He does not compel that person's belief.