Recent content by Will J. Kinney

Hi JesusFan. The KJB has never changed its underlying Hebrew and Greek texts like the ESV, NASB, NIVs all do. They just corrected some spelling errors and typos. There never was a real "revision" like an overhaul of its texts. Any Cambridge King James Bible you can get at any bookstore today...

See the whole article here - Another King James Bible Believer

Oh...you mean the 1995 NASB Vatican supervised Critical text version that rejects and adds to many Hebrew readings, contains false teaching in many verses and tells us that the children of Israel DECEIVED God in Psalms 78:36? That one? Or do you mean any of the other NASBs that keep on...

So, in plain words you have never seen nor read nor can you show any Bible that you believe is the complete and 100% true words of God because there ARE NO Originals. I'm shocked....shocked I tell you. ;-)

Gregory of Nyssa, A.D. 382, Against Eunomius, Book I, chapter 22: "as the Scripture says in the description of the fall of the morning star, the mysteries on which subject are revealed by our Lord to His disciples: "I saw Satan falling like lightning from heaven." A.D. 400 - The Apology of...

I and many others believe that Lucifer or Satan's fall is recorded here, and that he, the devil, was the real spiritual power behind the kingdom of Babylon. Babylon also appears prominently again in the book of Revelation as the kingdom of the beast and both are spiritually empowered by Satan...

Hi SG. Two things for now. First, your list of different years are not different revisions of the KJB as though they were changing the underlying Hebrew and Greek texts they are translating from as do the versions you like so much like the ESVs, NASBs, NIVs, etc. They were just catching and...

You have really gone over the edge of sanity if you think the likes of Dan Wallace is even ballpark close to the truth. "The KJV rendering “but not for himself,” apparently suggesting a vicarious death, cannot be defended."!!! Really? You obviously did not actually read the article before you...

Hi Ascetic. You don't really believe that any Bible in any language you can show us is now or ever was the complete and 100% true words of God. This is not slander. It is just the truth of the matter, and you know that it is. There are no where near 300 let alone 700 archaic words in the KJB...

Hi SG. Once again, you did not actually read the article before you posted your comments, right? It is prophetic about what will happen to Lucifer, who became Satan. "Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell" And as for your Biblical illiterate statement that Satan never had any children, you...

Hi Van. Neither you nor Dan Wallace believe that any Bible is inerrant. This examples is just one of many where the so called "oldest and most reliable manuscripts" differ from each other and where even the oldest known manuscript readings are rejected by the Vatican Version promoters. Even your...

Here is just part of the article. All English Bibles before the KJB of 1611 also have the word LUCIFER in them. This includes Wycliffe 1395, Coverdale's 1535, the Great Bible 1540, Matthew's Bible (John Rogers) 1549, Bishop's Bible 1568, and the Geneva Bible 1599 - "How art thou fallen from...

Helpful Hint for all bible agnostics and self appointed authorities who will NEVER show us a copy of any Bible in any language they believe is now or ever was the complete and inerrant words of God. Read the article before you make your comments. Just a suggestion. Proverbs 18:13 - "He that...

Lucifer is correct and here is why. "Lucifer" or "Morning Star" (Day Star) in Isaiah 14:12? Another King James Bible Believer In Isaiah 14:12 the King James Holy Bible (and MANY others, as we shall soon see) reads: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O LUCIFER, son of the morning...

And I don't see that changing anytime in the near future.