1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Alito Confirmed

Discussion in '2006 Archive' started by BroTom64, Jan 31, 2006.

  1. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is the way I would line up the justices:

    Conservative: Scalia, Thomas, Alito

    Liberal: Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, Kennedy*

    Swing: Roberts, Kennedy* (at best, from a conservative perspective)
     
  2. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh and for those of you who lament these liberal GOP picks while insenuating that GWB is part of the grand conspiracy... it is very likely that those liberal picks were compromises by former GOP presidents to keep the "balance" on the court as it was. The Dems controlled the Senate except for 2 years up until the 90's. Even now it isn't strongly conservative.

    Reagan probably had to appoint a "moderate" in order to get a "conservative" through the opposition. Same with Bush 1 and Ford... though neither were genuine conservatives to begin with.
     
  3. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    One more justice is needed to reverse the idiotic eminent domain decision.

    Should we continue to fall one justice short, be prepared to have your church building seized one day, and handed to a developer who promises local officials a greater tax base.
     
  4. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This vote, to me is far more interesting than the confirmation vote.

    Kennedy and Kerry now have a lot of egg on their face by confirming they are the obstructionists Republicans have been saying they are.

    Their efforts to abrogate their advise and consent constitutional role in favor of partisan politics have failed. This failed attempt will be used against many democrats come election time.

    Pretty dumb move. :rolleyes:
     
  5. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scott,

    he has cited international precedence, ruled against state sodomy laws, ruled against property rights, etc.

    Thanks, Scott. I had forgotten about the foreign precedent and Kelo cases. Not much of a conservative or even swing voter, is he?
     
  6. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    carpro,

    Pretty dumb move.

    I'm not that optimistic. Massachusetts voters keep returning them both to the Senate.

    And yes, those are interesting numbers. But there are two possible explanations, it seems to me: (1) that they (the Dems in favor of cloture) geuninely favored an up or down vote or (2) that they were afraid of the nuclear option.
     
  7. leah2

    leah2 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yippeee, I am so happy too, have been and am praying for he and his family!!
     
  8. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Dumb move for the party as a whole.

    Massachussetts voters have been far to the left of mainstream for decades.
     
  9. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    carpro,

    Dumb move for the party as a whole.

    I hope you're right. I fear it won't matter to the voters.
     
  10. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Along the same lines:

    http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/62585.htm

    SUICIDE OF THE DEMS:
    KERRY'S FLOPIBUSTER

    By DEBORAH ORIN

    EXCERPT

    January 31, 2006 -- THE joke in Republican circles now is that if John Kerry didn't exist, Karl Rove would have to invent him.
    Republicans loved 2004 loser Kerry's flop of a filibuster against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito because it had Democrats tearing each other's eyes out — over a fight they couldn't win.

    Not only did Kerry lose, he lost big time — just 25 Democrats were willing to join him as the party split apart over Alito, just as it has ripped apart over the Iraq war.

    The vote was 72-25 against filibuster, so Team Kerry lost 3-1.
     
  11. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    BTW, for my lib friends out there who are anxious that the balance on the Court has shifted, if my line-up above is correct, one more conservative would restore some much needed balance. If Roberts turns out to be conservative, then another conservative would simply shift the balance away from the liberal tilt the court has had for several years.

    As a correction, though, for the sake of fairness, I will note that Kennedy did write the dissent which Rehnquist joined in Stenberg v. Carhart, the decision which struck down Nebraska's partial birth abortion statute.
     
  12. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,044
    Likes Received:
    1,647
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have lots of problems with various policies of President Bush but I give him kudos for picking Roberts and Alito for the U.S. Supreme Court and getting these two moderate originalists confirmed by the U.S. Senate. [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  13. Kiffen

    Kiffen Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Bush made 2 excellent choices. Maybe we will see a turning around of the court.
     
  14. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    BTW, I just noticed, watching a "re-run" of the State of the Union, that Justices Breyer and Thomas were there, along with C J Roberts and Justice Alito. I was impressed that both "wings" of the Court were represented in welcoming the Court's new Justices.
     
  15. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I honestly believe God had his hand on the confirmation.. How else would you explain the miracle of Senator Byrd voting to confirm him.

    I watched Byrd's statements last Thursday and thought to my self, "Who are you and what did you do to Robert Byrd?"

    He actually tried to pass himself off as conservative.

    Anyway, for Byrd to vote for a Bush appointee was a miracle!
     
  16. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    I honestly believe God had his hand on the confirmation.. How else would you explain the miracle of Senator Byrd voting to confirm him.

    I watched Byrd's statements last Thursday and thought to my self, "Who are you and what did you do to Robert Byrd?"

    He actually tried to pass himself off as conservative.

    Anyway, for Byrd to vote for a Bush appointee was a miracle!
    </font>[/QUOTE]He is up for re-election and it is not a sure thing this time.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  17. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah you're probably right.
    But it was kinda comical watching him pretend he is a conservative.

    He knows that WV IS a conservative state.
     
  18. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Maybe a little. O'Connor freguently took conservative positions but sometimes did not.

    I believe it's going to take one more Constitutionally oriented conservative to actually turn the court around completely.
     
  19. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0

    O'Connor took positions without regard to political position. That means sometimes the decision was favored by liberals, sometimes by conservatives, sometimes by both, sometimes by neither.

    But regardless of who's on the bench, their decisions should be based on the law, and only the law; not on political partisanship, not on personal or religious view, and not on popular opinion. While I personally believe that Constitutional constructionism tends to be a conservative position, I certainly do not want to see conservative activist judges on the bench any more than I want to see liberal activist judges on the bench. Judicial activism is wrong, no regadless of the political ideology.
     
  20. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    3-page warning: This thread will be closed no sooner than 11:00 p.m. ET by one of the moderators.

    Lady Eagle,
    Moderator [​IMG]
     
Loading...