What about polygamy? Does God FORBID it?

And?? what??

 

There are alot of types of Christ in the old testament.

Donna that means that many people were a picture of Christ and his plan for salvation. take Abraham and issac. Issac was a type of Christ in many ways, for one he was around the same age (I have scripture to prove this) as Christ when his FATHER Abraham offered him on the alter. Issac was shown to CARRY his own wood to the alter, just like Christ carried his cross. Issac went WILLINGLY and could have resisted but he didn't. Jesus could have called his angels to take him down. Issac had faith in his father and trusted God's will so did Jesus. See all the similarities this is what is called TYPE of Christ. In Genisis Methuselah was said to be a type of Christ.

 

A Biblical case against polyandry is easily made but polygamy is a little more obscure. Furthermore, how do you view Jesus’s statement in Matthew 19:9 that God originally intended for one man and one woman?

 

Why did He not forbid it for the rest of the Church? </font>[/QUOTE]Exactly. He was expressly talking about the pastor, not the general population. </font>[/QUOTE]You’re rationalizing. Specifically forbidding polygamy for pastors does not make it acceptable for the rest of the church. The situation was that people were in the church that had come to salvation in a polygamous state. Even today, what do you say to Muslim who accepts Christ and he has six wives with six kids by each? Do you tell him to get rid of five wives and their kids? A man guilty of polygamy can be saved but one can never be a pastor. However, this is not to infer that it’s okay to go out and marry several wives.

 

Why did He not forbid it for the rest of the Church? </font>[/QUOTE]Exactly. He was expressly talking about the pastor, not the general population. </font>[/QUOTE]

 

Why did He not forbid it for the rest of the Church? </font>[/QUOTE]Exactly. He was expressly talking about the pastor, not the general population. </font>[/QUOTE]Actually, I think there are a number of NT Scriptures that say that it is forbidden for the rest of the church.
For example, Romans 7 says that a woman that is married to another man while her husband is alive is an adulteress. Does this only apply to instances of divorce and not polyandry?

In Matthew 19, a normal interpretation is that the Lord Jesus is saying that if the first marriage stands, a second marriage is adultery. A broader concept than just divorce.

I Tim 3:2 and Titus 1 give qualifications for church leaders. BUT these leaders are told to be examples to the flock. The believers are told to imitate their example in passages in Phil. 3:17, 4:9, I Thess.1, 2 Thess. 3, I Tim 4, Titus 2, I Pet 5, I Cor 4 and I Cor 11.

So, yes, I think there are a number of passages, therefore, against polygamy in all its forms.
It is specifically forbidden and generally forbidden.

Not that it usually matters to Baptists, but Tertullian and the early Church Fathers spoke against polygamy. 150 years ago, when Brigham Young was leading the Mormons to Utah, the church as a whole spoke against polygamy.
There is a lot of research on the horrible social problems that occur in polygamous societies. There are good social reasons to oppose it, too.

An analogous example is that God hates divorce, yet He commanded it in the specific example of the returned exiles in Ezra 10.
God choosing to allow polygamy for a time does not mean that it is His design.

Karen

 

How annoying! It wouldn't let me post, then it did 4 of them.

[ May 03, 2006, 11:19 PM: Message edited by: Karen ]

 

You get the point!!

 

Here is a scripture that, with a little stretch, could be interpreted to mean having many wives is a good thing. In fact this was one of the reasons they wanted to have many wives.

Psalms 127:3-5. Sons are a heritage from the Lord, children a reward from him. Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with the enemies in the gate.


I know...I know. It is a stretch of an interpretation. But someone was looking for a scripture which could be used to say having more than one wife was a good thing.

 

Here is a scripture that, with a little stretch, could be interpreted to mean having many wives is a good thing. In fact this was one of the reasons they wanted to have many wives.

Psalms 127:3-5. Sons are a heritage from the Lord, children a reward from him. Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with the enemies in the gate.


I know...I know. It is a stretch of an interpretation. But someone was looking for a scripture which could be used to say having more than one wife was a good thing.

 

No one posted the first biblical reference to someone taking more than one wife, which is in Gen. 4:

I posted all that for a reason (I left out verses 20-22). I think we can draw principles from this -- Lamech was a descendant of Cain and took 2 wives and ended up a murderer. But it was in the time of Seth's son that "men began to call upon the name of the Lord."

This is the first instance in the Bible where men begin to call upon the Lord and so is very significant, especially in contrast to the Lamech line, he who took 2 wives.

 

Actually, neither divorce, nor polygamy are mentioned in Romans 7. Divorce breaks the marriage relationship so that the woman is no longer married to her former husband. To contend that divorce does not break a marriage is contrary to the clear statement of Deut 24 that “she may not return to her former husband”. The idea that a divorce does not break the marriage is never stated in Scripture, and the contrary is stated in several places.

.........</font>[/QUOTE]Must not have made myself clear. I agree with you on that point. Divorce does break a marriage. But many often use this verse, correctly or incorrectly, against divorce to the extent that remarriage is wrong while the former spouse is living.
I was attempting the point that there would seem to be application, also, to polyandry.
If a woman was married to two men, bigamy, in other words, it would seem to be forbidden by this passage, in spite of assertions that the NT does not address the issue.

Karen

 

Deut. 17: 17, refers to the king. God says he must not take many wives or he will be led astray.
A prohibition against polygamy. I suppose one could say it was only directed to the king, and 3 or 4 is not necessarily many.
(I think that would be looking for a loophole rather than obeying Scripture.)

Also, I think it is noteworthy that Abraham and Isaac each had only one wife.
(Hagar was Sarah's idea, and it led to problems.)
Jacob was tricked into having two wives, and it led to problems.

Karen