Bush seeks to federalize emergencies

I don't like it. Not all governors are incompetent as Blanco.

But you have to expect this response with all the screaming that was being done blaming the federal government for the initial slow response to Katrina.

I like the principle behind "posse comitatus" and hate to see it completely eliminated because the governor of one state did not understand her role in a disaster and was unable to function adequately.

 

AMEN!!!

Can't you just see the potential for abuse under a Janet Reno type executive----very scary!

What's even more scary to me is this request is more in line with a democratic president; very scary indeed!

The lines between the parties are becoming more & more blurred.

 

We had to see this one coming. How long can you blame the White House for a failure of local and state government without getting a response from the President? The media is pushing Bush into this one, like they have on other issues such as DHS. The conservative Bush seems to be a memory. He is enlarging government at every turn, and still getting killed by the left. I hope he wakes up and remembers what the federal government is supposed to do, and then sticks to that.

 

Well said, Brother Bell.

 

Be careful, or you'll be accused of Bush bashing.

 

This bothers me:

(1) the problems with the federal response to these disasters has been blown way out of proportion, IMO, and it seems clear that most of the problems had to do with an incompetent Governor and a crazy mayor, with a not inconsiderable amount of corruption thrown in.

(2) the Federal Response Plan (recently overhauled, now the National Response Plan) has not been to take over emergency operations but to render assistance as requested by the states and localities. It is dangerous and flouts our federal system to take primary control of the efforts and...

(3) even more dangerous to put the military in charge. Even as one who wears the uniform, there are all kinds of problems with doing this, not least of which is the control of the Posse Comitatus Act prohibiting US military involvement in law enforcement. I can assure you the military is not excited about such a mission as is now envisioned. The military is about killing people and breaking things. It is touching to see military helicopters flying SAR (search and rescue) missions and saving civilians, but they are doing so in support of a civilian chain of command. The heavy hand of the military has no business being in charge in a civilian "theater".

 

I figure we can start playing Taps for the Posse Comitatus Act. It really isn't compatable with the Patritot Act(s) and the final phase of the Amerikan police state both parties have been busily building up to in the last few decades. Remember, good guys now wear black masks carry German submachine guns and run in "wolf Packs".

 

poncho,

Does the PATRIOT Act give any powers to the military? Just asking, I don't know.

 

First the Federal government is critized for not being "first responders".

Then there's objection when they decide to go ahead and take over the role of first responder.


Does that make sense?

 

LE,

I like that picture of you.

 

ballfan,

Does that make sense?

Sure it does, it's two different groups of people demanding two different things.

 

That's hard to say FTR. There are so many pieces of legislation related to the Patriot Act(s) that were passed as riders on other bills it's really tough to keep track of them all.

From what I can gather though these Act(s) have given too few people too much power.

 

Not to dispute your second point, but you said we could play Taps for the PC Act because of its incompatibility with the PATRIOT Act. If the PATRIOT Act doesn't give any powers to the military then it is not incompatible with the Posse Comitatus Act. Right?

 

I said it is hard to tell if the Patriot Act(s) (there is more than one) and the many pieces of legislation related to it that isn't written in the Patriot Act(s) themselves gives power to the military.

Maybe I should have said the Posse Comitatus Act is not compatable with the growing police state mentality of the federal government. Which when reading the Patriot Act(s) and related legislation gives us a glimpse into that mentality. Lets not forget the Poindexter Total Information Awareness idea that was closed down because of public awareness and was later resurrected as Terrorism Information Awareness same program different name different source of funding. This is how it works FTR, they propose something, wait for a reaction in favor or against and act accordingly, either way the proposed idea or law gets passed changed or repealed under it's original name with fanfare or after a name change and under the radar, if one source of funding is dried up another can always be found. The left and right both do this. Clinton made his plays, now Bush is making his.

We can easily make this into a left vs right issue blame the other sides actions and justify our sides actions and play by the globalists rules of total engagement in the paradigm something I refuse to do any longer BTW.

One thing seems clear to me the left would like us disarmed and the right isn't afraid to use confiscation. The PC act gets in the way of that mentality. Whether one Act has direct ramifications on the other is moot, I reckon it will soon be clear that the federal government wants total control and they have been working towards that goal for a long time while we were eyeing the "other sides actions" with paranoia and working to promote alot of the same things for "our side" with confidence.


Bush is even after habeas corpus. If the HC and PC are eliminated what are we left with?