1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"When the plain sense make common sense, seek no other sense."

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Gold Dragon, Aug 29, 2005.

Top Posters
Page 1 of 3
  1. Gold Dragon

    Gold Dragon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    149
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    This mantra was and still is used to counteract the allegorization that was evident during the modernist-fundamentalist controversy of the late 1800s, early 1900s.

    I believe this mantra does a great disservice to the grammatical-historical hermeneutic which seeks to interpret the biblical text from the perspective of the historical, cultural, grammatic and literary context of the text and the author.

    I believe that the "plain sense" which proponents consider to be the "literal" or "non-allegorical" sense is actually interpreting the text from the historical, cultural, grammatic and literary context of the reader and not the author. This practice is what I believe to be the definition of the word eisegesis which is to read our own meaning into a text.

    While allegorical eisegesis is often easy to spot, non-allegorical eisegesis (or what often happens in the "plain meaning") is often subtle and difficult to detect without deeper study into the text and context.

    I prefer to read the bible exegetically, whether that exegesis involves allegory or not. I believe that preferring non-allegorical interpretations whether they are exegetical or not, is a recipe for the eisegesis that we often see in fundamentalist circles.

    With that in mind, it is by God's grace and the work of the Holy Spirit that any of us have been able to interpret his word correctly, regardless of our methods or preferences for hermeneutics.
     
    #1 Gold Dragon, Aug 29, 2005
  2. Charles Meadows

    Charles Meadows New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree completely.

    [​IMG]
     
    #2 Charles Meadows, Aug 29, 2005
  3. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    You mean Jesus is not a literal door? [​IMG]

    Joseph Botwinick
     
    #3 Joseph_Botwinick, Aug 29, 2005
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Literal does allow for all sorts of grammatical devices. Including fables. Metaphors. Allegories.

    Amazing how many forget about all the nuances of grammar and THINK they know what a text must mean! [​IMG]
     
    #4 Dr. Bob, Aug 30, 2005
  5. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. Bob's (or should I say the English language's) definition of literal is so broad that it loses all meaning.
     
    #5 mioque, Aug 30, 2005
  6. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    bump
     
    #6 mioque, Aug 30, 2005
  7. Charles Meadows

    Charles Meadows New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1
    Amazing how many forget about all the nuances of grammar and THINK they know what a text must mean!

    That actually applies more to strict literalists, who generally do NOT know the nuances of grammar, which generally have less to do with interpretation than do factors of context!
     
    #7 Charles Meadows, Aug 30, 2005
  8. PrimePower7

    PrimePower7 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do know that God riding on the clouds in historical view of defeating the enemies of Israel cited in the Psalms is seen as a literal thing of the future. Oops! Sounds almost Preterist!?
     
    #8 PrimePower7, Aug 30, 2005
  9. Gold Dragon

    Gold Dragon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    149
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Agreed. Which makes it really ironic when some "literalists" don't.

    Agreed. One danger is ignoring the nuances of context and thinking you know what the text means. The other is paying attention to the nuances of context and thinking you know what the text means.

    What I'm trying to say is that while I subscribe to and strongly encourage the historical-grammatical hermeneutic over the "plain sense" hermeneutic, I also try to keep my interpretations in check. The thinking being that just because I employ a hermeneutic that I percieve to be better than some other hermeneutics, doesn't mean my interpretations are perfect. I continually need to be humbled to learn from others who arrive at different interpretations, whether they use the historical-grammatical hermeneutic or not, while challenging their interpretations with good hermeneutics and prayer.

    I may be wrong, but I believe Bob was agreeing with you.
     
    #9 Gold Dragon, Aug 30, 2005
  10. Bartimaeus

    Bartimaeus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    909
    Likes Received:
    0
    Literal Interpretation
    Allegorical Interpretation
    Historical Interpretation
    Grammatical Interpretation
    To my knowledge these are four distinct processes to enable us to interpret the scripture correctly. The order that I have listed them in does not identify the precedent of any one of them in my opinion. I do believe though, that many people on the BB use them in an order that leaves them out in "left field".
    Thanks ------Bart
     
    #10 Bartimaeus, Aug 30, 2005
  11. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think so. Clouds are so insubstantial they can't hold anything up. Maybe there will be clouds around at the same time Christ is around but He won't be using them to literally ride on.
     
    #11 Paul of Eugene, Aug 30, 2005
  12. Petrel

    Petrel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe Christ will be much less dense. :D
     
    #12 Petrel, Aug 30, 2005
  13. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Huh? What on earth are you talking about, Mioque?

    The Bible is to be taken literally. IF the literal sense is a fable, then take it as a fable. That isn't hard!

    Example - Here is a FABLE (man made story) that, when we take the Bible LITERALLY, we must know that this is a story and did not ACTUALLY happen!

    Judges 9: 8-15

    The trees went forth on a time to anoint a king over them; and they said unto the olive tree, Reign thou over us.

    But the olive tree said unto them, Should I leave my fatness, wherewith by me they honour God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees?

    And the trees said to the fig tree, Come thou, and reign over us.

    But the fig tree said unto them, Should I forsake my sweetness, and my good fruit, and go to be promoted over the trees?

    Then said the trees unto the vine, Come thou, and reign over us.

    And the vine said unto them, Should I leave my wine, which cheereth God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees?

    Then said all the trees unto the bramble, Come thou, and reign over us.

    And the bramble said unto the trees, If in truth ye anoint me king over you, then come and put your trust in my shadow: and if not, let fire come out of the bramble, and devour the cedars of Lebanon.
     
    #13 Dr. Bob, Aug 30, 2005
  14. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is dr. Bob cheating? Yes he is.
     
    #14 mioque, Aug 31, 2005
  15. Humblesmith

    Humblesmith Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    hmmmm.......let's see now.......this says "literal" in English has lost 'all' meaning..........but is this statement to be taken literall? hmmmm.........if this statment is to be taken literaly..............and........ anything literal has lost all meaning.............then either this statement has lost all meaning, or it refutes itself........hmmmmm........

    Naw, that couldn't be it. I must have misunderstood.
     
    #15 Humblesmith, Aug 31, 2005
  16. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now lets stop being so abstractly un-literal and insist that everthing be concretely literal.

    Meaning, its just like a sidewalk. Got that?
     
    #16 Paul of Eugene, Aug 31, 2005
  17. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    If truth is beautiful, can plain sense be true?
     
    #17 Paul of Eugene, Aug 31, 2005
  18. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    Why use meanings Christians dream up but instead use the accepted meanings.

    lit·er·al (litÆÃr Ãl), adj.
    1. in accordance with, involving, or being the primary or strict meaning of the word or words; not figurative or metaphorical: the literal meaning of a word.
    2. following the words of the original very closely and exactly: a literal translation of Goethe.
    3. true to fact; not exaggerated; actual or factual: a literal description of conditions.
    4. being actually such, without exaggeration or inaccuracy: the literal extermination of a city.
    5. (of persons) tending to construe words in the strict sense or in an unimaginative way; matter-of-fact; prosaic.

    Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary CD-ROM. (1999). (Version 3.0).[Computer Software]. Random House, Inc.
     
    #18 gb93433, Aug 31, 2005
  19. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    al·le·gor·i·cal (alÅi gôrÆi kÃl, -gorÆ-), adj.
    consisting of or pertaining to allegory; of the nature of or containing allegory; figurative: an allegorical poem; an allegorical meaning.

    Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary CD-ROM. (1999). (Version 3.0).[Computer Software]. Random House, Inc.
     
    #19 gb93433, Aug 31, 2005
  20. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    A figure of speech, sometimes termed a rhetorical figure or device, or elocution, is a word or phrase that departs from straightforward, literal language. Figures of speech are often used and crafted for emphasis, freshness of expression, or clarity. However, clarity may also suffer from their use.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figures_of_speech
     
    #20 gb93433, Aug 31, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 3
Loading...