Bush lied about WMD's?

Thank our God for President Bush
the fact that he was elected twice
should speak volumes to those who hate
his actions concerning Iraq and Afghanistan
but ask those who are there they are loving
their new democracy who caused that
GEORGE W BUSH and our brave military
if they are not allowed to be free why should we be America has only achieved it's greatness Freedom because it fought for it and God helped us win and that freedom for all it's citizens

Thank you Dear God and Thank you President Bush and our brave soldiers
the victory

 

Two excellent posts! Great job!

 

Open criticism of the President as a member of the Armed Forces is punishable by the Uniform Code of military Justice.

This soldier should keep his critism to himself.

 

Curious. I'd like to see this.

 

Bush was not elected, he fraudulently stole both elections.

http://www.rense.com/general59/how.htm

 

Absolute crock! He was duly elected in accordance with the Constitution.

 

Curious. I'd like to see this. </font>[/QUOTE]http://www.army.mil/references/UCMJ/ucmj2.html#888.%20ART.%2088.%20CONTEMPT%20TOWARD%20OFFICIALS

888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
889. ART. 89 DISRESPECT TOWARD SUPERIOR COMMISSIONED OFFICER
Any person subject to this chapter who behaves with disrespect toward his superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

And if those won't cover it, the UCMJ "catch all" article will.


934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

 

Prophecynut or Conspiracynut?

Can elections be stolen? Yes.

Can a professing conservative Republican steal an election where a significant majority of the press dislike and distrust him? Not very likely.

People who are this desperate to explain away Bush's victories need to just take a humble pill and realize that the voters disagreed with them (in the constitutionally prescribed way) about who the president should be.

2000 was close. 2004 was not. Get over it.

In retrospect, it probably would have been better for the long haul if Bush had lost in 2000 then "rescued" the country from the incompetent disaster a Gore presidency would have been. With his policy ideals, the recession probably would have turned into the stagflation we saw in the late 70's.

As it is, current events may lead to a RINO or Democratic president in 2008... just in time for Supreme Court Justices to name several SCOTUS members and sustain rule by judicial fiat for the forseeable future.

 

Carpro,

The military provision does not make it a crime to criticize the President. It makes it a crime to use "contemptuous words". There's quite a bit of difference there. What is deemed to be "contemptuous" is quite open to interpretation. However, I don't think that criticism or disagreement in and of itself automatically qualifies as "contemptuous" in this provision.

 

"Can a professing conservative Republican steal an election where a significant majority of the press dislike and distrust him? Not very likely."

Sure he can with a little help from the monopoly media (5 or 6 corporations) which is supported by advertisers such as...


1. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Bentonville, Ark., 1, $258.681

2. Exxon Mobil Corp., Irving, Texas, 3, $213.199

3. General Motors Corp., Detroit, 2, $195.645

4. Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., 4, $164.496

5. General Electric Co., Fairfield, Conn., 5, $134.187

6. ChevronTexaco Corp., San Ramon, Calif., 7, $112.937

7. ConocoPhillips, Houston, 12, $99.468

8. Citigroup Inc., New York, 6, $94.713

9. International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, N.Y., 8, $89.131

10. American International Group, Inc., New York, 9, $81.300

11. Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, Calif., 14, $73.061

12. Verizon Communications Inc., New York, 10, $67.752

13. The Home Depot Inc., Atlanta, 13, $64.816

14. Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Omaha, Neb., 28, $63.859

15. Altria Group Inc., New York, 11, $60.704

16. McKesson Corp., San Francisco, 20, $57.129

17. Cardinal Health Inc., Dublin, Ohio, 19, $56.830

18. State Farm Insurance Cos., Bloomington, Ill., 21, $56.065

19. The Kroger Co., Cincinnati, 18, $53.791

20. Fannie Mae, Washington, D.C., 16, $53.767

21. The Boeing Co., Chicago, 15, $50.485

22. AmerisourceBergen Corp., Chesterbrook, Pa., 24, $49.657

23. Target Corp., Minneapolis, 25, $48.163

24. Bank of America Corp., Charlotte, N.C., 23, $48.065

25. Pfizer Inc., New York, 37, $45.950

26. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., New York, 26, $44.363

27. Time Warner Inc., New York, 29, $43.877

28. The Procter & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, 31, $43.377

29. Costco Wholesale Corp., Issaquah, Wash., 33, $42.546

30. Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, N.J., 34, $41.862

31. Dell Inc., Round Rock, Texas, 36, $41.444

32. Sears Roebuck and Co., Hoffman Estates, Ill., 30, $41.124

33. SBC Communications Inc., San Antonio, 27, $40.843

34. Valero Energy Corp, San Antonio, 55, $37.969

35. Marathon Oil Corp., Houston, 52, $37.137

36. MetLife Inc., New York, 38, $36.261

37. Safeway Inc., Pleasanton, Calif., 41, $35.553

38. Albertson's Inc., Boise, Idaho, 35, $35.436

39. Morgan Stanley, New York, 40, $34.933

40. AT&T, Bedminster, N.J., 22, $34.529

41. Medco Health Solutions, Franklin Lakes, N.J., new to list, $34.265

42. United Parcel Service Inc., Atlanta, 43, $33.485

43. J.C. Penney Co. Inc., Plano, Texas, 42, $32.923

44. The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich., 51, $32.632

45. Walgreen Co., Deerfield, Ill., 45, $32.505

46. Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Wash., 47, $32.187

47. The Allstate Corp., Northbrook, Ill., 44, $32.149

48. Lockheed Martin Corp., Bethesda, Md., 56, $31.844

49. Wells Fargo & Co., San Francisco, 46, $31.800

50. Lowe's Cos. Inc., Mooresville, N.C., 60, $31.263

The list goes on.

 

You bet Poncho... Why did they want him in office? For the sport of publicly destroying him?

 

Not automatically but most troops are made aware that article 134 is there to cover anything that's not covered elsewhere. An argument could also be made that "contemptuous" and "critical" , could in certain cases , be tantamount to the same thing.

These particular articles of the UCMJ also mentions "officers" in particular. It appears that it may not apply to enlisted personnel. Once again, article 134 rises to the occasion.

The conclusion is that, if you are in the armed forces, you'd best keep your mouth shut about your superior officers and civilian leaders. There's a fine line between being critical and contemptuous.

 

They don't care about politics ScottJ. They care about two things.

Money and control.

They'll use republicans as well as democrats to meet these ends. The liberal media is an illusion that serves their purposes...to make money and control opinion so they can make money.

 

Open criticism of the President as a member of the Armed Forces is punishable by the Uniform Code of military Justice.

This was specifically used in one unit I served with to silence criticism of then-President Clinton.

 

Curious. I'd like to see this. </font>[/QUOTE]http://www.army.mil/references/UCMJ/ucmj2.html#888.%20ART.%2088.%20CONTEMPT%20TOWARD%20OFFICIALS

888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
889. ART. 89 DISRESPECT TOWARD SUPERIOR COMMISSIONED OFFICER
Any person subject to this chapter who behaves with disrespect toward his superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

And if those won't cover it, the UCMJ "catch all" article will.


934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court. </font>[/QUOTE]Good job, Carpro! You beat me to it!

 

Bush was not elected, he fraudulently stole both elections.

http://www.rense.com/general59/how.htm </font>[/QUOTE]

 

I'll tell you why. It's critically important because WMD's are what the administration used to convince the American people of the need for war.

Bush's deception has so far cost the lives of over 3,000 American soldiers and added another Trillion dollars to our already insane 9 Trillion dollar national debt.

Lying is wrong. Lying that kills innocents and sinks people into debt is just plain evil.

Anyone who condones this shares in that sin and should be ashamed. They should fall to their knees and beg God's forgiveness for their evil.

 

Is there no end to the bitterness of the left toward this President?

 

Again, this is a dilemma for conservatives. Only conservatives have a complaint about Mr. Bush. All of you left wing liberals should be on cloud 9, in the fact he is just like you: unbalanced budgets, uncontrolled borders and failed immigration policy, inablility to execute a winnable war, inept leadership, failure to address social security, no action on abortion, and a steady march towards a one world mind set.

In fact, he sounds like the exact candidate you should nominate in 2008.