Featured Another Blow to Saturday Resurrection sababatarian theory!

Romans 11:16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.

It is the progress of this discussion that is not serving Him.

I am hoping He will change it back to the way He wants it, but I am bowing out, brother. Too much biting and devouring going on in there.

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

2 Timothy 2:24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, 25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

You have to know when to let it go. You may need His help to do that. I do, but you can walk away in Christ's love for He will help you do it too.

Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

 

Vooks, are you here?

Then listen here!

SHAME ON YOU!

 

Thanks, to prove, proof --- what Vooks can spell, but fails to do.

 

Emphasis CGE . . .

. . . HUH?!

. . . HUH?!

 

Just keeping this for reference.


Vook's question at first: April 15 2015#10

Vook’s question intermediate: 4.12 AM today#25

Vook's question at present: Today at 8.02 AM

How long did it take Vooks to formulate his latest versions of his question?

From 4.12 AM Today until 8.25 AM today --- with GE leading him like Gretel Hänsel through to himself, unknown territory. How would I have known? Because I kept to the Text to lead me. But Vooks did not.

For nearly 10 months Vooks had one thing on his mind, but never realised what it was ---something I never gave a moment’s thought : because I simply stuck to the Text. But Vooks did not.


But he is a clever man, this Vooksie of us. Quick enough, very quick was he to see, o @@@@ here comes trouble! Make it look like it’s old GE who’s the retard.


But 10 months ago old GE already questioned Vooks what is it, Vooksie, said old GE, what’s up that upsets you so with regard to women’s ~trips~ to the grave?


Originally Vooks had a skirmish with someone else on BB who dared ask him something about a woman – Singular and he nearly blue his top off.


Now again, dear Vooks, I ask you again, WHAT FOR? UNTIL WE HAVE FOUND OUT W.T.H. IS GOING ON [apologies president Trump] I can’t be of any help to you : WHAT IS THE RELEVANCE?! Relevance to anything you can tell me about with regards to the day and time of day on which Jesus Resurrected?!


It will really help – if not you, then me!

 

I thought that was what I basically said, Jesus, the living soul, born to the virgin Mary said, "the Son of Man would be___"

Correct Matt 12:40 does not say anything about Hades but Acts 2:27,32 does. Matt 12:40 does say, will be in the heart of the earth. Was, "Jesus," whatever constituted, the whole of, "Jesus," was it dead for that period of time or was whatever constituted the whole of the person, "Jesus," alive for that period of time?

Did Christ die for the ungodly or not die? Give his life a ransom?

 

#47Just keeping this for reference.


Vook's question at first: April 15 2015#10

Vook’s question intermediate: 4.12 AM today#25

Vook's question at present: Today at 8.25 AM#38

Emphasis CGE: . . .

 

If Christ did not die for the ungodly I and you would be in our ungodliness and lost-ness still. And resurrected Christ not : "from the dead", i and you would be even worse off.

"I have power to lay down my Life and I have power to take up my Life again." It is the same Power and only Power with which God forgives sins.