Featured The Absolute Decree of Reprobation Expounded

Again, there is no disagreement over the fact that both Jacob and Esau are equally guilty in Adam.

The point in contention is whether or not God had no choice whether to reprobate both of them, none of them, or one of them.

That choice to reprobate Esau was due to God’s eternal purpose to glorify His justice.

Had it pleased God, He could have reprobated Jacob and elected Esau, because as Paul clearly explains, there was no discernible difference between them.

The fact that He chose one and rejected the other was based on reasons known only to God, based on the counsel of His own will.

Election is, indeed, to salvation, the means being supplied by the grace of God.

Reprobation is to damnation, the gracious means to salvation being justly denied.

The decision to elect or to reprobate result in eternal decrees, which manifest His infinite wisdom, holiness and righteousness.

Decrees represent the infallible purposes of God which will certainly come to pass.

Included in the decree to elect are the predestined means to the end.

Their good works and rewards were also decreed in eternity.

Likewise, included in the decree to reprobate are the predestined sins by which the reprobate will voluntarily and spontaneously commit ever so willingly.

Thus, God has not only, in the decree to reprobate, determined the depth and breadth of the sins, but the degree of eternal punishment due them.

For example, an unbelieving Pharisee who died prior to the ministry of Christ will not be judged nearly as harshly as the Pharisee who called for Christ’s execution.

Here we see a choice as to which particular person would be born when.

Both are Pharisees, yet the severity of their judgments is significantly different, depending on the timing of their birth and death.

These are just a few of the decisions which are part of God’s secret will to reprobate.

Yes, all men are equally guilty,

But not all men are equally punished or rewarded.

The cause of the distinctions lies in the hidden counsel of God’s good pleasure.

 

Some Final Thoughts on Reprobation​

Part 4​

Until the time in which God’s eternal decree to elect a certain specific sinner takes effect, that particular chosen sinner is no different than the sinner who will never experience the saving grace of God.

Both are under the wrath of God (John 3:36), guilty in Adam (Romans 5:12), enemies of God (Romans 5:10) and impotent to do anything about it (Romans 5:6).

Despite these seemingly insurmountable obstacles, Christ died for His people, ungodly sinners though we were.

Furthermore, this unparalleled act of love resulted in the love of God shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost who is given to us (Romans 5:5).

Without asking our permission or counsel, the Lord decided to save a multitude of sinners, out of every nation, tribe, people and language.

He would be their God and they would be His people, to the praise of His glorious grace.

At the same time, the Lord decided not to save multitudes of other sinners.

Instead, He preferred to punish them for their sins, to the praise of His glorious justice.

Keep in mind, there is no difference between sinners guilty in Adam who were not yet born.

Yet, before mankind came into being, God had already determined who would be His people, and who would not be His people.

His reasoning for choosing some sinners over others is hidden from us.

Thus, we are given the command to preach the Gospel to every creature, trusting God to give the increase to whom He will.

For God knows who are His own, those for whom Christ died (2 Timothy 2:19; Matthew 1:21)).

To summarize:

God gives the necessary means by which the Elect are infallibly saved.

This is a positive decree.

God denies the necessary means by which the Reprobate may be saved.

This is a negative decree.

Romans 9:18

Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

In this verse Paul compares election to reprobation.

They both originate in the sovereign eternal will of God’s good pleasure, contingent on nothing outside of Himself.

But there is yet another reason for Paul’s comparison.

Both are positive actions of God stemming from positive decrees.

Not only has God decreed to not grant saving grace to certain sinners, He has also positively decreed to judicially harden those same sinners, fitting them for certain destruction.

From our vantage point it is not obvious as to when that hardening process begins in the reprobate.

Consider the case of Paul.

The early Christians could not readily believe Paul was actually converted, having experienced his unbridled hostility, as well as the harm to which he had exposed them.

Yet there are cases of hardening which we can and should discern.

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth (1 Timothy 4:1-3).

A seared conscience is a hardened conscience, unwilling to desire that which is good, preferring evil instead.

Even common sense is lost.

The German extermination of the Jews is a recent example of such a conscience.

The ongoing torture, rape and sodomizing of Catholic children by the Catholic priesthood is another example.

The perpetual cover-up of the sexual assaults by the Catholic Church hierarchy is yet another.

The overt homosexuality of the Priesthood has been publicly exposed for centuries revealing an evil conscience.

The sacrifice of the Mass in which a wafer is offered to God as a propitiation for sins is the result of a seared conscience.

The doctrine of Transubstantiation whereby the wafer is believed to be the God-man Christ is yet another proof of a hardened conscience.

And can there be any doubt that the Roman Pontiff, who communes with Voodoo dolls and their spirits, is numbered among the damned?

I would have the reader to note the doctrine of forbidding marriage is considered a doctrine of devils.

Here the Holy Spirit points to the Roman Catholic Church as demonic, for it is this Church which forbids its clergy and nuns the ‘sacrament of marriage.’

And have they not commanded their followers to abstain from meat on Fridays?

I now ask the reader to consider the fact that there have been numerous ‘Evangelical’ leaders who have called the Roman Catholic Church a Christian Church, its Pope a Christian man to be honored as a role model.

Is it possible that by such affirmations these so-called ‘leaders’ are revealing a judicial hardening and blinding which God has been set in motion and from which they can never recover?

 

Today you are considered a 'hater' when calling out sin and hypocrisy......especially among those hypocrites within professing Christendom.
Is there a bigger hypocrite than the Pope?
Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity is a forgotten Scripture to many.