1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Forsaken in Matthew 27:46

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by JonC, Feb 8, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I NEVER stated that Jesus ceased to be God, that the Spirit departed from Him, but the scriptures do show to us that he experienced ALL things as the sin bearer on the Cross that sinners will in Hell, but He did it for those 3 hours, and then it was accomplished!

    The father had to turn His back for that time, as God cannot be tolerating sin in His presense!
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus did not go to the literal Hell, but in His humanity did feel as if he had while on the Cross!
     
  3. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jon seems to be stating that in as he understands this, that being forsaken by God would mean that the Spirit departed from Him, and that he died in a different sense that we would see it?
    Forsaken by God only for those 3 hours, never ceased being god, Spirit never departed Him, but did suffer in His humanity a sa sinner will under wrath of God!
     
  4. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree that Jesus was not punished with the punishment that we would have endured. In fact, that Jesus is God makes the Cross an even greater consequence than all of humanity consigned to an even greater torment than Hell (if that were possible).

    And again, I do not see how we can remain biblical and say "in his humanity Jesus felt this....but not in his divinity".
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My statement (which has been rejected so many times) is that on the Cross God was not separated from Jesus in that Jesus remained God and the unity of the Trinity was never broken. I have agreed that forsaken means an "abandonment" in the sense that deliverance was not immediately realized (Jesus was left to suffer the consequence of sin).

    If my argument is wrong, which is what several claim here, then what needs to occur is not "double-speak" (i.e., God departed from Jesus but Jesus was still God; Jesus suffered our punishment, but it was not the punishment we would have suffered; God's Spirit was removed, but Jesus remained united to the Holy Spirit; the Father removed His presence, but Father and Son are One; ect.) but point to point evidence.
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I never said that you did. Again (just like last time we had this "talk") I quoted Joel Beeke. I know that you believe God departed from Jesus but Jesus remained God. I was just offering the fuller quote.
     
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That is because the scriptures show to us examples of Him operating in His Deity, and othertimes in His humanity!
     
  8. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus never separated from the father in sense broke Relationship, as always was/is God, but His humanity suffered break in His perfect fellowship with Father!
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks for clarification...
    I am getting His Puritan Theology, so maybe will explore his views more in detail now!
     
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What examples do you have of Jesus operating in his deity (and not his humanity)?

    IMHO, Beeke is an excellent writer and commentator. I also like D.A. Carson (and he and Beeke have a few works together).

    It may be that we just disagree on terms. I find "his humanity suffered break in his perfect fellowship" to be problematic. First, saying that "God separated from Jesus" does not mean a more narrow statement of a break in fellowship (we are present among people daily without fellowship). And second, saying that fellowship was "broken" is perhaps not as narrow as fellowship changed.

    The Father was there, present on the Cross, actively offering His Son. The relationship itself did not change, but its content did change. Not only is the Father offering affirmation (God is immutable) but along with this affirmation comes wrath. This change can be represented in the illustration of Abraham and Isaac. The relationship remained, Abraham remained, but at the moment Isaac lay on the alter something was different. The fellowship is still perfect. But within it the Father is laying the iniquity of mankind on his Son as the atonement.
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus knew the thoughts of all men, Jesus walked on water, commanded the storm, but also was weak, tired, and hurt!
     
  12. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since you like Dr Carson, and he is a good calvinist author, have you oicked up the Zondervan Niv Study bible, as he was general editor for it?
     
  13. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Generally I like study bibles because they give me places to put sticky notes. But yes, I do have the Niv Study Bible. I just purchased his commentary on Matthew as well.
    Peter walked on water, healed the sick, the lame man, commanded Tabitha to rise from the dead. Did these things testify to the divinity of Peter?

    No, of course not. In the same way, Jesus did nothing of his own initiative but he did the will of the Father. He did not see equality with the Father a thing to be grasped but came as man. And as man he remained in faithful submission to the Father (not just at the Incarnation but to death...even death on a cross).
     
  14. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He was both God and man, and he knew all thoughts, could heal, do miracles, because he was/is God also!
     
  15. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes. He could. Yet instead he submitted himself in obedience, even to death. He did not do those things of his own accord, but rather through faithful obedience. Those things testified to what? His divinity? Not exactly (at least not per Scripture). In the Bible these things testify that Jesus is sent by the Father.

    Peter healed, did miracles, raised a dead girl, cast out demons, walked on water, made a lame man walk....not because he was God but because of his faith and obedience to God. These miracles testified not of Peter but of God, of Christ.
     
  16. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus was still able to function though as fully God when he choose to?
     
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You mean he would have been able to take back that "equality" that was set aside prior to the Cross, had He chosen to. Scripture tells us he didn't.
     
  18. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all. Isa 53:6

    But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. Isa 59:2

    And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Matt 27:45
    And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost. Luke 23:46

    For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Matt 12:40

    On the morrow after the weekly Sabbath following the Passover on the 14 day of the first month.

    Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. John 20:17

    Did the Son commune with the Father during those three days and three nights?

    Why three days of Christ being dead? And be raised after three days or the third day, why three?
    BTW I am asking not having a sure answer other than maybe prophesy yet I don't think just prophesy is the correct answer. I think it has something to do with being made pure/clean.

    Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come into the land which I give unto you, and shall reap the harvest thereof, then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it. Lev 23:10,11
     
  19. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,919
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My problem is that when I think we are in agreement, you say something (as in the Calvinism/Arminianism thread) which makes me realise that we are not. You have objected furiously in the past to any suggestion that Christ was 'abandoned.' We argued uphill and down dale over that last year. Then you have posted quotes in which both Beeke and Piper say he was abandoned. "Great!" I think; "we've got agreement," but now you seem to be presenting that abandonment as nothing greater than a communication failure.

    Christ was made sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). [The suggestion that He was made a sin offering fails, if no other way, to John 3:14. The brazen serpent is a figure of sin, not a sin offering] God's wrath against sin was poured out full-strength against sin upon Christ. That included separation from the Father. Exactly how that worked I don't know; I only know that it was so. The Trinity was not broken up (silly suggestion), nor was the Spirit withdrawn from Him (I have never suggested such a thing), but He experienced absolutely the abandonment of the Father, as both Piper and Beeke agree.

    God the Father departed absolutely. "O My God, I cry in the daytime but You do not hear; and in the night season and am not silent." That completely close relationship that had existed between Father and Son from eternity past was severed. The Christ felt Himself to be utterly abandoned, and He hung desolate upon the cross in the darkness, in terrible agony, with the Jews mocking Him and taunting Him. This was Him experiencing hell on our account, and if He did not do so on your behalf and on mine, we must experience it for ourselves.
    I have re-stated my understanding above. You can agree or disagree from there.
     
  20. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,919
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was not the separation of the 'second death' because it was not permanent, but the pain and the desertion felt by the Christ was the same. It was, for those three or four hours, a complete separation, 'for one part of the punishment is loss of the divine presence.' There was no point, in those hours, when the Father whispered to Him, "Don't worry! I'm still here." That is not to say that the Father ceased to love the Son- not at all!-, but judicially, He was condemned to all the penalties of hell.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...