Featured DESPICABLE: Look what universities are now teaching about 9-11

Hundreds of eyewitnesses saw a plane plow into the Pentagon. They didn't look at the hole in the wall, they SAW A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON.

 

OK, I am done here, at least with you. I'm not going to pound the allcaps back at you. Hopefully someone will respond meaningfully to the points we truthers raised.

For me those really important ones would be:
1. Lack of photographic evidence of Pentagon plane
2. Anomalous WTC 7 collapse
3. Physical improbabilities of barely trained pilots to achieve incredible flight trajectories
4. Dearth of evidence at the Shanksville crash.

There are plenty more. But these stand out.

But it may be futile to bring these up since most of the responses here are in allcaps, or resorting to name calling and innuendos of being anti-American.

 

That's how you took my comment? Very revealing.


Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.

 

You're done because you can't refute the eyewitnesses that saw a plane hit the Pentagon.

I've dealt with truthers before. Your arguments are nothing more than a bunch of leading questions laden with innuendo.

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.

 

What is more reliable, alleged testimony of some vague "hundreds of eyewitnesses" or photographic proof? (Rather, lack of it) Believe me, if there really was a plane there would have been clear photos of that plane. If not hitting the building then at least after it hit. It just left a circular hole. An impossibility.

But if you are OK with that...

Still no response on the actual points I raised. Not that I am surprised.

 

Tell me how I should have taken your comment. Be straightforward. What does my not being in America have to do with my comments on this topic?

 

http://www.cracked.com/personal-exp...rofessional-911-truther-and-i-gave-it-up.html[/QUOTE[/QUOTE]

Oh please. This is evidence? Such obviously slanted perspective, not even pretending to be objective.

 

Anecdotal and mere appeal to emotions. I guess that ranks high with you.

 

Unlike the other two posts there are actually good questions here. But I am away from my laptop, but plan to answer these more in detail tomorrow. Too much to thumb type.

 

No. I read it. Yes, he said he was truther. Try using some discernment.

 

Hmm. Truther. Never thought I'd live to see the day when truth was a slur word.

 

Yes, someone killed by an evil entity is truly tragic. Shall we discuss how many innocent civilians have been killed by American drone missions ? All of this started from that false flag of 9/11 .

 

I think it is valid to depict the 9/11 terrorists as "monsters." The carefully planned murder of thousands of people just gong about their jobs is indeed monstrous. That is why identifying the perpetrators - perpeTRAITORS - is paramount.

Even if bin Laden & al Qaeda were guilty, the revenge exacted against whole countries, killing millions & destroying homes & infrastructure is also monstrous. Again the victims were people just going about their jobs, and with absolutely no guilt with respect to 9/11.

Responding to precisely focused terrorism with massive random terrorism is not a vald response for a supposedly civilized country concerned to spread democracy.

 

I don't know where your circular hole idea comes from. The photos of the Pentagon certainly do not show a circular hole.


Here is a photo of the plane just before it hit the Pentagon.



Here are pieces of the plane after hitting the Pentagon.



Here is a video of the plane hitting the Pentagon. You have to watch carefully as the plane is visible for no more than a tenth of a second.