The Soul, the Aeolian Body, Death, Mistranslation of the Word Spirit, Identity of the Airflow of God

I did read it teknon.Elohim is plural not because angeles were present with God but because of the plurality in and of itself in genesis and thousands of other places where there is not one word concerning angels. If there were then the Hebrew syntax would have been different and Elohim would have not been affected.

Elohim is used in thousands of places where no angels are indicated including Genesis chapters 1 through 3.

Even in the SHEMA Elohenu is plural.

Elohim is plural in and of itself as a stand alone noun.

 

The phrase here is MALAK ELOHIM. In this case yes, Malak is the protective being to present God to a mortal being.
A mortal man cannot look at God and live. Malak in this case would be an angel, a cherub, seraphim or even the pre-incarnate Yeshua known at that time as the Logos. That would be my choice.

John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

 

Now it is you who are not reading my answers correctly.

I already said it is a compound connective word in the Hebrew. You look like a person who can read Hebrew. Go check it. Exodus 3:2ff

The phrase here is MALAK ELOHIM. There are two beings here MALAK and ELOHIM. MALAK is a functional title of a being which both projects the message of ELOHIM and protects the life of the recipient, the receiver of the message.

MALAK being functional may be an angelic being but I believe it is the reincarnate Yeshua.

The Greek word aggelos does not always mean angel:

John the Baptist sent out some of his disciples to ask Jesus some question and when they were through:

Luke 7:24 And when the messengers of John were departed, he began to speak unto the people concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness for to see? A reed shaken with the wind?

messengers is aggelos.

 

Winner.

Irrefutable proof that the Holy Spirt is a person.

 

I believe it was more than an angel, but if you are right its an unusual usage of the Hebrew word Elohim.
Out of the message that was given to Moses it had to be a message of God Himself saying tell them that I AM sent you.

I AM is the core of the tetragrammaton YHWH a concatenation of the three tenses of the first person verb - to be - I Was, I AM, I will be



Sometimes expanded as to the Formula in the Revelation
Revelation 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

This proves that Jesus Christ is God Almighty the Great I AM.

 

I read your lengthy piece teknon and have no problem with calling Jesus Yeshua, though I have my preference of Jesus because the name is not the defining attribute of almighty God.

Personally I believe you are incorrect in calling Yehovah (YHWH) an "angel" in the sense of being lesser than Yeshua (as you say) or having a name of lesser significance.

There are different ways of addressing Almighty God, the - LORD God - is YHWH-Elohim in a connective way and because YHWH is based upon the total tenses of the 1st person representation of the verb "to be" YHWH is a descriptive name or actually an adjectival name meaning GOD IS ETERNAL with no beginning and no end. ELOHIM - within the Godhead are 3 distinct persons which is why Elohim is plural (in thousands of places in a standalone way). The LORD God therefore refers to the Trinity and those distinct persons within that Godhead as ALL eternal.

The angel of the LORD MALAK-ELOHIM. MALAK translated as "angel" is functional as "messenger" or one who communicates as the function as one can see in the verses containing the name.

Genesis 16:10 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.

This is called a theophany.

This is why Yeshua is called the word - the Logos - in the New Covenant scripture because He being God Himself communicates God to man in His totality

Logos Grk. The expression of an inward thought.

John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word (Logos) and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

So wherever we see The Angel of the LORD in the OC scripture (MALAK-ELOHIM) it is the Logos within the Triune Godhead communicating with man.

Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.

There must be a mediator between the God and man.

1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

 

OK.

 

tek, Are you able to enlighten us on any Jewish traditions or teachings?

 

Have you considered the Wailing Wall cannot be part of the Temple?

 

• 2 Chronicles 3:1: "And Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem in the mount of Amoria, where the Lord appeared to his father David, in the place which David had prepared in the threshing-floor of Ornan the Jebusite."[7]

I restlessly saw a program that suggest the Temple is within the city walls that Solomon built, in the Old City much lower than the Temple Mount. It had to be near the Gihon Springs in order to be able to cleans the Temple after thousands of daily sacrifices.
The is no water on top

 

please indicate which scripture ,I can only find 2 Chronicles 3:1, this Mount Amoria, and other references to Mount Zion

 

I found this:

In II Samuel 6:17 it states that David pitched a "tabernacle" (tent) for the Ark. Solomon was taken to this same "tabernacle" (tent) to be crowned (I Kings 1:38,39) which the account shows was at the Gihon Spring. Both I Chronicles 15:1 and I Chronicles 16:1 mention this special "tent" for the Ark. This particular "tent" at the Gihon Spring (where David and Israel offered sacrifices and other Temple duties — I Kings 3:15) must not be confused with the "Tabernacle" constructed in the days of Moses which was then located at Gibeon (I Chronicles 16:39; I Kings 3:4). In a certain sense, the "Temple" for Israel for the last 27 years of David’s rule, and the first 11 years of Solomon’s rule was where the Ark of the Covenant was located at the Gihon Spring. All the references in the Psalms to waters coming forth from the throne of God refer in type to those exclusively from the Gihon Spring. This shows how significant it was to David and Solomon to have "spring waters" at the site of the Temple in Jerusalem. So, Solomon built his Temple on the Ophel mound situated just above the Gihon Spring. There is no doubt of this fact!