Featured Universalism a strawman argument.

That does not change the fact that the fire is what is described as everlasting. However, the punishment described in v.46 is everlasting in its consequences. It is final.

 

There is particular redemption. Any universal redemption (which is what you are presenting) is universal payment for all sins, including the sin of unbelief. That makes your position universalism.
Yet, you deny this, which means you must have a form of particular redemption. But, you deny that as well. The conclusion is that you don't know what you are talking about and ultimately you just want to be the one who determines your destiny rather than God determining your destiny. It all comes down to you demanding to have control.

 

Are you going to say that only the so called elect were/are sinners? Or as Rom 5:7 says “the ungodly”. So what about the rest of humanity, were they not sinners, not ungodly? Calvinists keep insisting that Christ only died for them. But the bible does not make that distinction rather it is just the opposite. 1Ti_2:6 gave Himself a ransom for all.


This is another true that you fail to accept

Joh 3:14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up,
Joh 3:15 that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.
Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
Joh 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
Joh 3:18 "He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

Note it says those that believe not those that have been pre-selected to believe. You, Austin, are struggling with this truth

 

Austin you continue to read the bible through your philosophy of calvinism. You have placed calvinism as your authority over the bible. You deny or twist clear scripture when it does not agree with your view and when that pointed out to you you claim that others just do not understand the bible.

 

Conditional mortality (sometimes called annihilationism by opponents).

The Mark 9:48 citation of Isaiah 66:24 explicitly teaches the destruction/death of the wicked.

 

Universalism applies to only one thing... SIN!... Salvation applies to only one thing... GOD!... His Mercy and Grace, which none deserve... Brother Glen

It's not what you did for him, it's what he did for YOU!

 

So, Roman Catholicism, which also promotes general redemption. 37, look at the company you are keeping by supporting general redemption.

 

" know so salvation?"

You are entirely dependent on God alone to save, yet you are promoting your own reasoning as the means of knowing you are saved. Are you unaware that the heart is desperately wicked. Your reasoning could point to hell if you rely on it.

 

Yes, the accusation of a belief in Universalism by a Determinist is often attempted through a false dilemma leading to a strawman argument fallacy.

 

Austin read these words and then explain what they say.
Act 16:30 And he brought them out and said, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?"
Act 16:31 So they said, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household."

Man can know they are saved or these words are meaningless and the offer of salvation is a fraud.

 

It's not a false dilemma. It is, however, people not willing to actually take their theory to its ultimate conclusion. Your unwillingness to be honest with your position is the problem you will not entertain.