#2 How could a person who sees the words 'go up' process them to be instructing them to 'go down'?

As an example, for our day and times,

"For 117 years of its existence the Southern Baptist Convention
had no article of faith about the universal, invisible church.

"In the 1950s and 1960s the liberals ceased power,
and in 1962 a revised confession was adopted which said:

"The New Testament speaks also of the church
as the body of Christ which includes all the redeemed of all ages" (Article VI)."

In Search of the Universal Invisible Church - Baptist Because

Why the change?

God's instructions on How He is to be Worshipped
in The Era of the New Testament Age
are contained within His revealed Words,
specifically and absolutely dependant on the God given ability
to hear His Word, as He gave it.

For example, if men were to take it upon themselves
to change God's Word into a lie,
by changing the words, "go down", into the words, "go up",

How could a person who now sees these words 'go up'
process them to be instructing them to "go down"?

If someone were to change the words, "Go down to the white circle",
in their mind, or by whatever process, to be the exact opposite in meaning and receive those words in a way that they now think that
it is instructing them to, "Go up to the black square",

when is it that they could ever be rationally expected to,
"Go down to the white circle"?

Worse yet, if men were take Words given by God
and lift them out of the Bible and make changes to them
which utterly deny and completely contradict His Teaching on
How He is to be Worshipped all during the New Testament Age

then replace His Words in the Bible with the words of men,
which have an exact opposite meaning to what God has revealed,

how could anyone rationally expect that they could still fully discern
and conceive of what God had provided in writing,
as their instructions from Him,
on how He is pleased to be Worshipped?

His Words have now been changed, which disenfranchises
and disassociates its readers, of what are now man's words,
from any possibility of perceiving and receiving the message
and instructions that God had Commanded.

Does: "The Religion and Doctrine of Denying
and Contridicting God's Word, to please Him", sound sane to you?

Then, maybe we should leave God's Words where we found them
and not expect that changing them is within the realm of sanity.

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times,"

That is now.

Today.

"some shall depart from the faith,

"The faith", which has been recorded by God in His instructions
on How He is to be Worshipped and have been circumvented,
and usurped by man, in their departure from "the faith",

"giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils".

Changing God's Word and the rejection
of what He says pleases Him
is the result of men,
"giving heed to seducing spirits",

and has now become the revelation of what pleases the devil?
"and doctrines of devils".

Trafficking in the doctrines of devils is devil worship.

Spiritual adultery.

Could our Age of demonstrable Christian Apostasy
be the result of devil worship?

Then, why do you say, "all saved souls are members of the Church"?

Where did that "Church" come from?

Who invented it?

Who is worshipped in that "Church"?

Again, where did it come from?

Why did the Southern Baptist Convention
suddenly change its Articles, after 117 years to read,

"The New Testament speaks also of the church
as the body of Christ which includes all the redeemed of all ages."

Really? After 117 years?

What were their best known Bible believing saints
doing those first 117 years?

Being stupid? Where they Illiterate?

Where they all blind to some of the most important
teachings of God?

Teachings by God concerning His Worship
that are Most Precious to Him?

Or were the ones that came after them,
"giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils".

 

How does the theory follow along,
for the people who are said by Protestantism to be "saved"
when "they are Spirit baptized into one body",
when it comes to folks in the Old Testament?

Weren't they supposed to be saved, too, somehow?

By a "sacrifice baptism", or "Tabernacle baptism",
or "a circumcision baptism"?

Those are just my smart aleck knee jerk reactions
that swirl around in my head.

But, what is the thinking supposed to be on that?

Do you know?

 

"The Covenant of Grace was a compact in Eternity,
between the Three Divine Persons, Father, Son, and Spirit;
in which each Person agreed to take His part
in the Economy of man’s Salvation.

"The Covenant of Grace is one and the same in all ages,
of which Jesus Christ is the Substance;

Jesus was given for “a Covenant of the people”, of all the people of God,
both Jews and Gentiles,
Who is “the same” in the “yesterday” of the Old Testament,
and in the “today” of the New Testament, and “forever”;

Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life”, the only True Way to Eternal Life;
and there never was any other way made known to men
since the fall of Adam;

No other Name under Heaven has been given, or will be given,
by which men can be saved.

The Patriarchs before the flood and after,
before the law of Moses and under it,
before the coming of Christ, and all the saints since,
are saved in one and the same way,
even “by the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ”;

The Eternal Covenant of Grace is one Covenant, however,
there are different Administrations of The Covenant of Grace,
particularly two distinct Administrations,
one "Old" Covenant before the coming of Christ,
and the other New Covenant after the coming of Christ.

These two different Administrations of the one Eternal Covenant of Grace
lay the foundation for the distinction between the “First” and “Second” Covenants,
or the “Old” and the “New” Covenant,
observed by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews.
(Heb. 8:7, 8, 13; 9:1, 15; 12:24),

The First Covenant we commonly call the Old Testament Times,
and the other the New Testament Age,
for which there seems to be some foundation in 2 Corinthians 3:6, 14
and Hebrews 9:15 where these two Covenants,
or rather the two Administrations of one
and the same Eternal Covenant of Grace
are allegorically represented by two women, Hagar and Sarah,
the bondwoman and the free (Gal. 4:22-26),
which fitly describe the nature and difference of those two Administrations.

I will just point out the Agreement between those two Administrations
of the one Eternal Covenant of Grace.

1. First, The Agreement there is
between the two Administrations of the one Eternal Covenant of Grace.

1a. They agree in their Efficient Cause, God:
The Covenant of Grace,
in its original constitution in Eternity, is of God,
and therefore it is called His Covenant, being made by Him;
“I have made a covenant—My covenant I will not break”, (Ps 89:3, 34)

and whenever any Exhibition or Manifestation of this Covenant
is said to be made with any of the Patriarchs, as to Abraham, David, etc.
it is ascribed to God,
“I will make My covenant—He hath made with me an everlasting covenant”
(Gen. 17:2; 2 Sam. 23:5),

so the New Covenant, or New Administration of the Covenant of Grace,
runs in this form, “I will make a new covenant”, etc (Heb. 8:8).

1b. In the Moving Cause, the Sovereign Mercy, and Free Grace of God,
which moved God to make the Covenant of Grace at first (Ps. 89:2, 3).

And every Exhibition of the Eternal Covenant of Grace,
under the former Old Testament Age,
is a rich display of it, and therefore it is called,
the “mercy promised to the fathers” in His “holy covenant” (Luke 1:72),

and which has so largely appeared in the coming of Christ,
which is ascribed to “the tender mercy of our God”,
that “grace” and “truth”, in the great abundance of them,
are said to come by Him; by which names the Covenant of Grace,
under the New Testament Gospel Age, is called,
in distinction from that under the Mosaic one (Luke 1:78; John 1:17).

1c. In the Mediator, who is Christ;
there is but one Mediator of the Covenant of Grace,
let it be considered under what Age it will; even Christ,

who under the former Old Testament Era
was revealed as the seed of the woman that should bruise the serpent’s head,
and make Atonement by His sufferings and death,
signified by the expiatory sacrifices, under the law;
the Shiloh, the peaceable One, and the Peace Maker,
the Living Redeemer of Job, and of all believers under the Old Testament.

(Moses, indeed, was a Mediator, but he was only a typical one.)

There is but “one Mediator between God and man, the Man Christ Jesus”;
there never was any other, and He is the “Mediator of the new covenant”
(1 Tim. 2:5; Heb 12:24).

1d. In the subjects of these Covenants, or Administrations
of the Covenants of Grace, the Elect of God,
to whom the blessings of it are applied.

It was with the chosen people of God in Christ,
that the Covenant of Grace was originally made;
and according to the Election of Grace all of the Spiritual Blessings
of Covenant of Grace are dispensed to the children of men.
(Ps. 89:3; Eph 1:3,4).

next: The Spiritual Blessings of The Covenant of Grace are the same,
that are given to The Old Testament saints and The New Testament saints.

 

adapted from: The Body of Divinity, by John Gill.

THE MANIFESTATION AND ADMINISTRATIONS
of THE ETERNAL COVENANT of GRACE
in THE OLD TESTAMENT and THE NEW TESTAMENT.
John Gill: Doctrinal Divinity - Christian Classics Ethereal Library

1e. The Spiritual Blessings of The Eternal Covenant of Grace
that are given to The Old Testament saints and The New Testament saints.
are the same under both The Old and New Testament Administrations.

Salvation and Redemption by the Jesus Christ
is the great blessing held forth and enjoyed under the Old Testament
as well as under the New Testament (2 Sam. 23:5; Heb 9:15).

Justification by the Righteousness of Christ,
which the Old Testament believers had knowledge of, and Faith in,
as well as in the New Testament (Isa. 45:24, 25; Rom. 3:21-23).

Forgiveness of sin through Faith in Christ,
all the Prophets bore witness to; and the saints of Old,
as now, in the New
had as comfortable an application of it
(Ps. 32:1, 5; Isa. 43:25; Micah 7:18; Acts 10:43).

Regeneration, Spiritual Circumcision, and Sanctification,
were what men were made partakers of under the First,
as under the Second Administration of the Eternal Covenant of Grace,
(Deut. 30:6; Phil. 3:3).

Eternal Life was made known in the writings of the Old Testament,
as well as in those of the New Testament;
and was believed, looked for, and expected by the saints of the former Era,
as of those saints in the latter New Testament Church Age,
(John 5:39; Heb. 11:10, 16; Job 19:26, 27).

In a word, they and we eat the same Spiritual Meat,
and drink the same Spiritual Drink,
for they drank of that Rock that followed them,
and that Rock was Christ,
(1 Cor. 10:3, 4).