1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Problem of there being an actual crucifixion date.

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by 37818, Apr 3, 2024.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am sure we both understand Mark 15:42 insofar as what the passage actually teaches.

    You presented a theory and asked for others to challenge it. I did.

    You do not understand the passage insofar as what it isn't teaching. You also do not appear to know your history.

    The Jews stopped using the Biblical calendar (the lunisolar calendar by observation/ messenger). One reason give was opposition that made observation difficult. Another was the exile.

    The Bablyonian Disporia based their dating on year of "the captivity of Jehoiachin".
    During the Hasmonean period the Jews adopted the Seleucid era counting.
    Until the 10th century they used the "Era of Contracts:.
    Then you had the anno mundi system.

    In the 12th century AD the Jews adopted a mathematical lunisolar calendar (the one you keep posting) to strictly follow the Law. It does what observation couldn't.


    In the end it does not matter. You are wrong because, as @Alan Gross noted, Mark woukd have reported what did happen in the first century- NOT what should have been done following a more percise 12th century calendar.

    We can't know the year because we do not have the calendar used (which was dependent on the Sanhedrin). BUT we do know the days the 1st century Jews observed because these were recorded.

    You have convinced yourself of an impossible date for the crucifixion. The funny thing is we can't know the exact date (which is why you rely on a modern calender), but we can know by Scripture that your date does not work. You simply can't see it because you are determined to dogmaticlly know what you cannot.
     
  2. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,555
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually methinks, celebrate, was a misnomer. We do show the Lord's death until he comes, would have been a better statement.

    They may have taken upon their own to celebrate the resurrection but I do not find to do so in the Word. I don't think. Not off the top of my head.

    Well I looked at the bottom of my head and think I will change my mind. I believe we should celebrate the resurrection. But the question is when?

    I will praise thee: for thou hast heard me, and art become my salvation.
    The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
    This is the LORD'S doing; it is marvellous in our eyes.
    This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:21-24

    Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:10,11

    However I believe Jesus died on the fourth day of the week around three in the afternoon and was resurrected on the seventh day around three in the afternoon. That is the day the LORD has made.
     
  3. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I believe Jesus was raised on Sunday because this fits the pattern of creation. But I know the tomb was empty very early, while it was still dark, on Sunday.

    As far as "celebrate" goes, you clarified very well. We observe Christ's death, the sacrifice made for us, the "stroke" of the powers of this world - but we celebrate the victory in the resurrection as sin and death is defeated in Him.

    I'd say the cross is a solemn observance while the Resurrection is a celebration - "He has risen!!".
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We have disageements.
    The readings in Mark are explicit.
    Mark 14:12.
    Mark 14:13-16.
    Mark 14:17.
    Mark 15:42.

    The Jewish day dates are from sunset to sunset.

    Our weeks are named Sunday through Saterday. From midnight to midnight.

    The first Jewish day is from our Saturday sunset to our Sunday sunset.

    The Jewish Preperation Day is from our Thursday sunset to our Friday sunset. Which is the beginning of the Sabbath.

    Mark 15:42, And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath, . . .

    Which the Friday traditition interperts to be late Friday afternoon before Friday sunset.

    Now even if we interpert Mark 14:17, And in the evening . . . . To be late afternoon, it would have to be a late afternoon the day before Friday. And according to Mark 14:12 the Jewish calendar day of the 14th. (NIV interperts as the 15th. Identifing the Friday as the 16th.)

    Other issues too.
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If we interpret Mark to determine an exact date then we are misinterpreting Mark.


    Mark tells us that Jesus was traveling when the Passover was being sacrificed and arrived to eat the meal when evening had arrived. He ate, went to the Garden, was arrested, and the next day crucified.


    We have some clues we can use
    :

    1. The Jews in Jesus' day sacrificed the Pasdover in the afternoon prior to the day, and the family meals were observed that evening (at sunset).

    2. The Jews observed 14 Nisan as a day of preparation (the 15th being a holy day).

    3. Jesus was quickly buried in a nearby tomb because the Sabbath was approaching.

    4. That Sabbath fell on a "high day".

    5. The Jews did not want to defiled themselves because they wanted to participate in eating the Passover (we don't know the day of the passover week, but most likely it woukd be the holy convocation on 15 Nisan).

    6. The Jews woud not conduct business, travel outside of very short distances, or bury a body on 15 or 21 Nisan as these were set aside as holy convocations.

    7. On 15 Nisan the Jewish leadership, priests, woukd be at the Temple observing the holy convocation.


    But we cannot know the exact date because in Jesus' day the Jews did not use the mathematical lunisolar calendar that you keep posting.
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @37818

    This is getting very old. To put a point on it - you have failed to prove your position. To do so you need to first address an important issue:

    The Law would prohibit the Crucifixion from occurring on 15 Nisan.

    The Jewish laws in Jesus' day would prohibit the Crucifixion from occurring on 15 Nisan.

    The gospels record exactly why it was important to the Jewish leaders to kill Jesus before 15 Nisan.

    You calculate, using a mathematical lunisolar calendar (that the Jews used beginning in the 12th Century AD) that Jesus was crucified on 15 Nisan.


    So your calculation goes against the Gospels, against the Law, and against the Jewish laws insofar as a date goes.


    The only "evidence" you provide is a calendar not used in Jesus' time and your interpretation of Mark (which most Biblical scholars reject).



    Please explain.

    1. How do you account for a 15 Nisan crucifixion being contrary to the motivation of the timing in the Gospels, a violation of the Law, and a violation of Jewish laws?


    2. Why should I, or anybody, consider your date a possibility, and can we without ignoring key passages regarding 15 Nisan?
     
    #46 JonC, Apr 11, 2024
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2024
  7. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Those events have Jewish calendar dates per the word of God.
    Mark 14:17.

    Mark 14:12. 14th.
    Mark 14:17. 15th.

    Mark 15:42-43. Interperting "now when the even was come" to mean late Friday afternoon.

    There were 7 days in the morning Preparation for the Priests to eat of a lamb offering, Numbers 28:17-25.

    Verse 22, but only one sin offerring.

    Any 7th day Sabbath was the "bigh day" during that week.
    Each of all 7 days a lamb was offered, Numbers 28:17-25.

    They had rules for observing the first crescent.
    ( Determination of the first visible crescent moon - new light )
    10 Classic Jewish Teachings About the Moon
    The New Moon With In Sight
     
    #47 37818, Apr 11, 2024
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2024
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are ignoring that the mathematical lunisolar calendar you follow was started in the 12th century to more precisely follow the Law (which implies that the Biblical lunisolar observation, and the "observation and rekoning" based on the Seleucid calculations, was not exact).

    What matters is HOW IT WAS DONE IN THE FIRST CENTURY.

    Even the Biblical calendar was less specific than you allow (it was based on observation) and changed with location.


    Another interesting item is the "cock crowing". As I'm sure you are aware, roosters and chickens were forbidden in Jerusalem. The "cock summon" or "crowing" was the three callings of the Priests to Israel.


    BUT you are still ignoring my questions. You just keep saying that the Jews were following the 12th century AD calendar.


    How do you justify ignoring that the Law, the Jewish laws, and the timing stated in the Gospels the Jews killed Jesus could not fall on 15 Nisan?
     
  9. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The New Moon With In Sight

    Certain of months would be veried 30 or 29 days.
     
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm going to ignore the "which calendar" argument because they used "observation and rekoning" based on the Seleucid calculations (and prescribed by the Sanhedrin), so we can't know an exact date. You can assume a clear evening and a 12th century calendar. That's fine.

    What I am interested in is the day.

    How do you address the fact that a 15th crucifixion would violate the Law, the Jewish laws, and the reason the gospels give for the Priest's timing?
     
  11. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Two questions.
    In Numbers 28:16-25. Each day the 15th to the 21st, there would need be a morning preparation for each of the daily lambs that were offered. And only in Numbers verse 22 was one sin offerring was added. What day would a single sin offerring be done in a week of 7 lambs?

    The Priest's are whom would be eating of the daily lamb offerings.
     
  12. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do not understand how this answers my question.

    I was specifically asking about the Jewish laws, the Law (passages in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers) which would have prohibited a crucifixion on 15 Nissan as well as the gospel writers explaining why it was important to the priests to kill Jesus before 15 Nisan.

    How do you reconcile the gospels, the Law, and the Jewish laws which would prevent a crucifixion on 15 Nisan with your calculation that it occurred on 15 Nisan???


    I ask because as it stands you are asking us to believe your calculations (using a 12th century method) against God's Word.

    This has to be addressed before we move on. It would be the same if you calculated the Resurrection to have been on Monday as how that contradicts Scripture would need to be addressed before talking about specific dates or days.
     
  13. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do not see where the 15th of Nisan date must make Christ's crucifixion impossible. If anything, Mark 14:12-17 makes crucifixion impossible without it being on that day.

    Show me the verse?
     
  14. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Mark 14:12-16 being the 14th of Njsan explicitly being the day before, places the 15th of Nisan as the day of Christ's crucifixsion.
     
  15. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I already did (several times).

    Exodus 12, Exodus 12, Leviticus 23, and Numbers 28 state that 15 Nisan is a holy day set apart as a holy convocation. No work, no business, no traveling (beyond residence). The Jews could not have arrested Jesus, held their counsel, or petitioned for His death on 15 Nisan.

    Matthew 26, Mark 14, and Luke 22, testify as to why the Jewish leaders chose a day prior to Nisan 15 to kill Jesus.


    You are relying on your misunderstanding of Mark 14:12-17 to erroneously believe the crucifixion had to occur on 15 Nisan.

    There are good reasons Biblical scholars reject that date. The reason is Scripture.

    To reinforce Scripture we have first century accounts of the timing of the killing, sacrifice, priest meal, and Seder meal.

    You made a mistake. It doesn't matter in the end, except you seem to hang so much on your error.
     
  16. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How does that prevent a 15th of Nisan crucifixion by the Romans?

    Also Matthew 27:62, Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate, . . .

    Wasn't this the Sabbath day?
     
    #55 37818, Apr 11, 2024
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2024
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Beyond the fact that the Jews wouldn't have arrested Jesus, held a counsel to deliver Him, pay Judas, turn Jesus over to the Romans, be present for the Roman's decision, be there to accept the release of Barnabas, lay Jesus in a tomb? The Romans woukd not execute on the Sabbath because they were to charged with keeping peace in the area.

    You seem to forget the readon they rushed to lay Jesus in a tomb.

    It would be meaningless if they were going to violate a day of holy convocation anyway.


    You seem to be forgetting the Jewish timing to kill Jesus before the 15th.

    You seem to be forgetting that the Jews could not pay Judas on the 15th.

    You seem to be forgetting the Jews couldn't arrest Jesus on 15 Nisan.

    You seem to be forgetting the Jews couldn't petition for the crucifixion on the 15th.

    You seem to be forgetting that the Jews would have been at the Temple when you think the Romans presented Jesus to them.

    You seem to be forgetting that Jesus could not be laid in the tomb on your timing.
     
  18. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But that is what happen. And based on the texts it happened on the 15th of Nisan.
     
  19. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are not being honest here.

    Based on your understanding the priests abandoned their positions, the Jews violated their laws, the Jewish leaders violated the Law, those following Christ violated God''s command, the writers of Matthew, Mark, and Luke made an error in explaining the Jewish leaders timing.....

    The logical conclusion is that your calculations are wrong.

    I have to side with Scripture on this one. You are mistaking. Mark was speaking form a 1st century Jewish perspective. He was not writing a technical instruction book.

    You have simply made a common error by forgetting that the gospels were written at a specific time in history and in that context.

    In understanding Scripture one of the first considerations is to determine and grasp what those words woukd have meant to the immediate audience (here, the 1st century audience living after the Resurrection).

    You pretend they were written to people in Moses' day using a 12th century AD calendar. You are wrong because of that slight error in judgment.
     
  20. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,847
    Likes Received:
    1,365
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Really? Mark 14:12 and context verses 13-16 being understood to be the 14th of Nisan. Exodus 12:18.
    The next day Christ was crucified. 14 plus 1 is 15!
     
  21. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You mean "according to my understanding, even though most Biblical scholars disagree".

    You understand Jesus to have eaten the meal on 15 Nisan (after sunset on 14 Nisan). That does not mean you are correct.

    You are simply arguing that your calculations are correct by insisting they are correct.

    You say the Jews violated the Law and Jewish laws of the holy convocation to crucify.

    By that logic, the Jews could have instead sacrificed the evening beginning 14 Nisan (as recorded in Jewish laws) and crucified Jesus on the afternoon of 14 Nisan.


    You have no ground to stand on because your position depends on violating Scripture. You just choose the Scripture to violate.

    The Passover killing could also have been the thousands of pasdover lambs and goats killed in preparation of the Passover (not necessarily the priest ceremony).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...