Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have no idea what you are talking about about.My last post was completely misconstrued, I was talking about a particular phenomenon, the born again whore, not all women blankety as was falsely accused.
It’s a real phenomenon.
I cited from three of your posts. You told him that "women today are not wife material." Then you went on to explain why.
I did not erase your posts or ban you. I closed the other person's thread as he could only speak of his high sex drive and hating God for not giving him a wife. As I said, he needs counseling.
I had no idea that you blanketly believed and taught that all women were whores, not wife material, and had sex with so many men that, like a used car, and had only "used leftovers" to offer a husband.
There are NO double standards in the Kingdom of God, as the Lord expects both men and women who claim to be Christians to remain chaste and virgin for their spouse to be if they have not yet had sexual relations with anyone.This will be my last post here. I've alway wanted to ask something to the men - and people in general - who believe that "only 3% of women who marry are virgins" and that the more men she's known before her husbands the quicker the divorce.
What about strict demands on the husband? Shouldn't he be chaste and pure before marriage? What of all the men who've had multiple partners before marriage? Wouldn't that count equally towards the divorce?
Why is sexual purity only demanded of a woman - a wife? And not a man?
This will be my last post here. I've alway wanted to ask something to the men - and people in general - who believe that "only 3% of women who marry are virgins" and that the more men she's known before her husbands the quicker the divorce.
What about strict demands on the husband? Shouldn't he be chaste and pure before marriage? What of all the men who've had multiple partners before marriage? Wouldn't that count equally towards the divorce?
Why is sexual purity only demanded of a woman - a wife? And not a man?
I think what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Equal expectations.This will be my last post here. I've alway wanted to ask something to the men - and people in general - who believe that "only 3% of women who marry are virgins" and that the more men she's known before her husbands the quicker the divorce.
What about strict demands on the husband? Shouldn't he be chaste and pure before marriage? What of all the men who've had multiple partners before marriage? Wouldn't that count equally towards the divorce?
Why is sexual purity only demanded of a woman - a wife? And not a man?
Everything you have stated here has absolutely NO foundation in scripture. It is pagan. It is worldly.All civilisations that wished to endure, highly regulated women’s purity.
Patriarchies are the only civilisations that have endured, matriarchies do not endure, never have.
Women are born with intrinsic value because of their fertility. They may be of no utility in any other way, yet they still possess intrinsic value.
Men don’t have intrinsic value, they are disposable. Their only value is their utility. They must prove their value as hunter provider and warrior protector to gain their right to breed. Rights of passage and great ordeals decide whether men live or die and reproduce.
80% of women reproduce but only 40% of men reproduce. This means 60% of men never reproduce. One man can Father a nation, but one woman can not mother a nation.
A man’s right to reproduce is hard won, a woman needs to do nothing and prove nothing. She can be a sack of potatoes on welfare.
Because a man’s right to reproduce is so hard won, paternity must be guaranteed.
We see today stories like the man who found out that none of his children were his children. He had fed, raised and educated other men’s children, his wife had slept with many different men. He found this out in relatively old age, to his devastation.
For a man to labour hard all his life with hope in his heart for no legacy, to be a cuckolded cruelly like that makes the flames of hell lick higher.
A woman’s maternal legacy is 100% guaranteed, a woman never has to worry that her children aren’t hers.
Men produce and fight for their legacy/ progeny.
If women don’t believe in a civilisation nothing terrible happens.
If men don’t believe in a civilisation, that’s the end of that civilisation.
Everything you have stated here has absolutely NO foundation in scripture. It is pagan. It is worldly.
According to scripture, as Scarlett O stated, both the man and the woman are expected by God to remain chaste before marriage and faithful for life after.
And to think, you presuppose to give someone advice on relationships.
Sickening!
Peace to you
The ability to reproduce is NOT a woman’s only “utility”. That is nonsense and reveals more about your bias than about any woman.
So, are men supposed to remain sexually pure also before marriage? That was the question.You are more of a surface thinker, carrying a heavy burden of prejudice, so you won’t ever actually seek to understand. That’s ok if you can live with it.
You are only reading to disagree, not understand, I get it.
I never said reproduction was a woman’s only utility.
One of the great dangers of not trying to understand something is coming to the wrong conclusions and assisted by prejudice leads to false accusations.
There’s a compounding of ignorance and obstinacy that occurs from this.
Understanding is a powerful gift in the attainment of knowledge. It’s a virtue that is cultivated by patient and focused consideration and reflection of what is actually expressed, not impatient, lazy, prejudiced or dismissive dispositions. These are the enemies of understanding, but are the band of brothers to ignorance.
Nothing you stated here changes the truth that your prior post was deep into paganism and void of scriptural understanding. You have no understanding of God’s gifts, especially if relationships.You are more of a surface thinker, carrying a heavy burden of prejudice, so you won’t ever actually seek to understand. That’s ok if you can live with it.
You are only reading to disagree, not understand, I get it.
I never said reproduction was a woman’s only utility.
One of the great dangers of not trying to understand something is coming to the wrong conclusions and assisted by prejudice leads to false accusations.
There’s a compounding of ignorance and obstinacy that occurs from this.
Understanding is a powerful gift in the attainment of knowledge. It’s a virtue that is cultivated by patient and focused consideration and reflection of what is actually expressed, not impatient, lazy, prejudiced or dismissive dispositions. These are the enemies of understanding, but are the band of brothers to ignorance.
So, are men supposed to remain sexually pure also before marriage? That was the question.
Nothing you stated here changes the truth that your prior post was deep into paganism and void of scriptural understanding. You have no understanding of God’s gifts, especially if relationships.
Understanding SCRIPTURE is a powerful gift of God, which you lack because of your blindness to TRUTH and deep involvement in the paganism of the RCC.
2 Timothy 3:6-8
Peace to you