• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Divine Good Pleasure

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Sorry, I’m not following….in simple terms then, what are you suggesting?
How familiar are you with lapsarianism. It is a "let's split some hairs" type of question.

Lapsarianism = the belief that God planned for man to fall (the sin of Adam was always part of God's plan before God created anything).

Supra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to save some and send others to hell. God first selected the people he would save in his mind and then God created man and allowed the fall. God's SOVERIGNTY is his most important attribute.

Infra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to create man and allow him to sin, God first decided in his mind to create people and then decided to save some. God's MERCY is his most important attribute.

"Christological" Supra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to glorify Jesus. EVERYTHING God does is directed towards one goal ... the uniting of CHRIST (the groom) with the saints (his bride) because THAT brings glory to Christ! Only after God planed that union, did He plan the things needed to make that happen ... there would need to be 'vessels of honor' and 'vessels of wrath' ... that would require creating man and allowing him to sin. Everything radiates out from the FIRST GOAL (glorify Jesus through the wedding of Christ and his Church). God's GLORY is his most important attribute.

So none of this is really anything. Everyone agrees on WHAT GOD DID. The speculation is sort of "which idea came first" to God [as if we are going to figure that out].
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How familiar are you with lapsarianism. It is a "let's split some hairs" type of question.

Lapsarianism = the belief that God planned for man to fall (the sin of Adam was always part of God's plan before God created anything).

Supra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to save some and send others to hell. God first selected the people he would save in his mind and then God created man and allowed the fall. God's SOVERIGNTY is his most important attribute.

Infra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to create man and allow him to sin, God first decided in his mind to create people and then decided to save some. God's MERCY is his most important attribute.

"Christological" Supra (lapsarianism) = God's first "thought" was to glorify Jesus. EVERYTHING God does is directed towards one goal ... the uniting of CHRIST (the groom) with the saints (his bride) because THAT brings glory to Christ! Only after God planed that union, did He plan the things needed to make that happen ... there would need to be 'vessels of honor' and 'vessels of wrath' ... that would require creating man and allowing him to sin. Everything radiates out from the FIRST GOAL (glorify Jesus through the wedding of Christ and his Church). God's GLORY is his most important attribute.

So none of this is really anything. Everyone agrees on WHAT GOD DID. The speculation is sort of "which idea came first" to God [as if we are going to figure that out].
I don’t believe that the father planned for human kind to fall. I believe that was a free choice in disobedience to His will.. if having to select a stance, which I don’t and can’t really do without information only He can provide… I’d veer towards Infra because I believe it’s His mercy…mercy upon mercy that comforts us as believers.
 

Charlie24

Active Member
From a "logic" point, that makes Jesus' birth, death and resurrection a "Plan B" for God's creation with "no sin" being "Plan A". [shrug]

A more accurate account would be that God through His foreknowledge knew man would fall before He created him.

God gave that man the free will to believe the lie of Satan, which God had promise would bring about that fall.

Through His foreknowledge of this, Christ was foreordained to redeem man from his sin. We know this because Peter told us so.

1 Peter 1:19-20

"But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:

Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,"

You see, there was no Plan B.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
A more accurate account would be that God through His foreknowledge knew man would fall before He created him.
I agree, but that places you back into "lapsarianism" since God "KNEW" that before God created man, so the question of which God planned first (create/fall) or (save/damn) since before creation God knew that the fall would happen and God "foreknew" those he would ultimately glorify.

As I stated earlier, It is not a hill that anyone should die on. It is just a THEORY about splitting hairs over which thought God had first.

@Earth Wind and Fire stated his belief that God did not plan the Fall, so I was pointing out the consequence of that idea.
 

Charlie24

Active Member
I agree, but that places you back into "lapsarianism" since God "KNEW" that before God created man, so the question of which God planned first (create/fall) or (save/damn) since before creation God knew that the fall would happen and God "foreknew" those he would ultimately glorify.

As I stated earlier, It is not a hill that anyone should die on. It is just a THEORY about splitting hairs over which thought God had first.

@Earth Wind and Fire stated his belief that God did not plan the Fall, so I was pointing out the consequence of that idea.

I have problems following most all of what you say, It's probably me, I don't know. But I'll say this in response.

God said, "let us create man in our own image." That came first, and then through His foreknowledge the rest fell in order.

The rest that "fell in order" was God's redemption plan for man.

You see, after Genesis 3, the fall of man, the entire rest of the Bible is about God's redemption plan for man in action.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
I have problems following most all of what you say, It's probably me, I don't know. But I'll say this in response.

God said, "let us create man in our own image." That came first, and then through His foreknowledge the rest fell in order.

The rest that "fell in order" was God's redemption plan for man.

You see, after Genesis 3, the fall of man, the entire rest of the Bible is about God's redemption plan for man in action.
The discussion is "lapsarianism" (the fall) which is not about the order that God DID THINGS [people agree on that] but the theoretical order that God first THOUGHT UP the different parts of His Plan [because Theologians have WAY too much time to think about strange things]. :)

So this is people thinking about God sitting around getting ready to create (pre Gen 1:1) and our guess about what God thought of first.
 

Charlie24

Active Member
The discussion is "lapsarianism" (the fall) which is not about the order that God DID THINGS [people agree on that] but the theoretical order that God first THOUGHT UP the different parts of His Plan [because Thelogians have WAY too much time to think about strange things]. :)

No man can know God's thoughts, only what He has given us to understand.

Why bother with the unknown that He has kept from us?

We'll know that soon enough after the grave, or at His coming.

I agree some have to much time on their hands! Placing that time and study in futile efforts.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A more accurate account would be that God through His foreknowledge knew man would fall before He created him.

God gave that man the free will to believe the lie of Satan, which God had promise would bring about that fall.

Through His foreknowledge of this, Christ was foreordained to redeem man from his sin. We know this because Peter told us so.

1 Peter 1:19-20

"But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:

Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,"

You see, there was no Plan B.
It is what it is…merely my own belief system.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I agree, but that places you back into "lapsarianism" since God "KNEW" that before God created man, so the question of which God planned first (create/fall) or (save/damn) since before creation God knew that the fall would happen and God "foreknew" those he would ultimately glorify.

As I stated earlier, It is not a hill that anyone should die on. It is just a THEORY about splitting hairs over which thought God had first.

@Earth Wind and Fire stated his belief that God did not plan the Fall, so I was pointing out the consequence of that idea.
Please note that I'm not saying that God did not actually want A&E to eat the forbidden fruit….there is a part of me that believes he actually set the table for that couples curiosity to get the better of them, thus Sin. I’ve even studied Talmud and the majority of the Rabbis believe that as well, so that they (A&E) might help to save humanity, but they never ever factored in Christ as the messiah. That is vociferously denied.

So there you have it …different interpretations speculating on the causation…though no one save God knows the truth…probably none of our business. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Paleouss

Member
Greetings atpollard. My apologies, for any long delay. It appears I only have time for hit and runs at the moment. Again, my apologies. My hope is that you have been doing well, my brother.
Perhaps true of "the Supra", but as Ligonier pointed out, not true of the theology of "Christological Supralapsarianism".

"the Puritan Thomas Goodwin, who held to what has been called Christological Supralapsarianism. The end [desired reason for] of all God’s decrees [including the fall, lapsarianism] is the union of the elect with Christ."
I have two points about your quote, above.

1. The notion of the "end of all God's decrees" is the "union of the elect with Christ" is simply traditional Supralapsarianism built from the Greek dictum "last in execution is first in intention". It is basically the answer of "the elect" to the question "for whom did God create?"

It seems to me that all Thomas Goodwin did, based on the quote, was add a preface in the form of a question to the Traditional Supra, i.e., "what will bring the greatest glory to CHRIST?". That is, it simply assumed the foundation in which the logic of the Traditional Supra was based without holding to, although some still do, the Greek logic in which it was founded... imo. The problems that arise from this ignoring the foundation of logic by which the Trad-Supra was founded by the Christo-Supra is the subsequent ignoring of any logic that might show its flaws (which is ironic, imo)... and there are many, imo.

2. My second point is that the Christo-Supra's #1, the question, is speculative. Or at least it generates speculative conclusions. It is simply asks a question and leaves the intent open to what one might think is the most important. It seems to me that this is the very reason some theologians today won't even engage in the debate because its very foundation seems to be speculative, at least in both the Trad-Supra and the Christo-Supra (again, imo).

I presented to you in another post what I believe God has shown us through the Holy Scriptures is His first intention. No speculation, no Greek dictums, no presuppositions of what is most important from my human perspective. That first intent of creation according to Scripture is ....
#1. God the Father’s decree to create for God the Son and that God the Son be the purposeful end of creation, that which all creation culminates toward and in.

Scripture tells us that God the Son is the Alpha (Rev 22:13, 1:8, 1:11, 21:6), the beginning. But Scripture also tells us that God the Son is the Omega (Rev 22:13,1:8, 1:11, 21:6), the purposeful end of this world that is to ‘unite all things’ (Eph 1:10) to Him, for Him (Col 1:16, Rom 11:36, Heb 2:10). Therefore, the purposeful end, that is the object of final end that was decreed from the precipice of creation, is that all creation culminates toward its intended end, and that is God the Son (Eph 1:10, Rom 11:36, Rev 22:13, 1:8, 1:11, 21:6).
That, right there, is God's intention and first decree according to the Bible.

So let's look at my assertion logically. First, God has told us through scripture that God the Son is the first intention of creation. He, God the Son, is for whom this world was created (He is the Alpha). Further, and second, God tells us through scripture that the Son of God is for whom the end of this world is designed. He is the Omega. All creation is to culminate to and in Him.

Creation is therefore "by", "through", and "for" the Son of God. So God creates a world that is (a) for the Son of God and this world is so designed to (b) culminate toward and (c) in Him (for His glory).

God then creates.

I will leave below what I think is the first four decrees based on this beginning intention of God that is found in the Bible...

#1. God the Father’s decree to create for God the Son and that God the Son be the purposeful end of creation, that which all creation culminates toward and in; thereby being the purpose of creation’s beginning and end, all for God the Son (I1)

#2. God the Father’s decree to create a world that nurtures its inhabitants, who begin in glory (small ‘g’) and end in Glory (big ‘G’), toward the first intention so the full presence of God can be realized by mankind; by reaching the purposeful end in God the Son, all for God the Son (I1).

#3. God the Father's decree to conquer sin and death everywhere, to put all things under His foot so the full presence of God can be realized by mankind, (I2); by reaching the purposeful end in God the Son, all for God the Son (I1).

#4. God the Father’s decree to permit a fall through the sin of Adam; who begins in glory and ends in Glory, so as to put all things under His foot (I3); so the full presence of God can be realized by mankind (I2); by reaching the purposeful end in God the Son, all for God the Son (I1).

All honor and glory to God our Father!

Keep seeking God's truth as if it were hidden treasure (Prov 2)
 
Top