• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Bible is always right and we need too.

First: approach any so called 'error' or 'contradition' with the mindset the Bible is always right.

Second: let every man be a liar and let God be true.

Third: Ask God for help.

Fourth: God will shew thee the answer - maybe a day, maybe years and it just make sense.

Take care,

Shawn is taking a break from discussing and defending the inherant Book KJB.

2 Tim 2:15
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
First: approach any so called 'error' or 'contradition' with the mindset the Bible is always right.

Second: let every man be a liar and let God be true.

Third: Ask God for help.

Fourth: God will shew thee the answer - maybe a day, maybe years and it just make sense.

Take care,

Shawn is taking a break from discussing and defending the inherant Book KJB.

2 Tim 2:15
I agree. There may be apparent contradictions in the bible, but no real contradictions.

God is indeed truth.

We do indeed need God's help to believe and understand His word.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First: approach any so called 'error' or 'contradition' with the mindset the Bible is always right.

Second: let every man be a liar and let God be true.

Third: Ask God for help.

Fourth: God will shew thee the answer - maybe a day, maybe years and it just make sense.

Take care,

Shawn is taking a break from discussing and defending the inherant Book KJB.

2 Tim 2:15
No such thing as a "KJB". You failed to respond to the proven goof in the KJV of "Easter" min Acts 12:4. There's simply NO Scriptural support for the KJVO myth. That fact alone makes it false.
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
No such thing as a "KJB". You failed to respond to the proven goof in the KJV of "Easter" min Acts 12:4. There's simply NO Scriptural support for the KJVO myth. That fact alone makes it false.
Although I agree with you, to be fair to KJB1611Reader, his post wasn't about those things. It was about:

Supposed errors and contradictions in the bible

God being true

The need for God's help in reading the bible

He ended by saying he was taking a break from "discussing and defending the inherant Book KJB." (I think he probably meant "inerrant.")
 
Although I agree with you, to be fair to KJB1611Reader, his post wasn't about those things. It was about:

Supposed errors and contradictions in the bible

God being true

The need for God's help in reading the bible

He ended by saying he was taking a break from "discussing and defending the inherant Book KJB." (I think he probably meant "inerrant.")
Yes.
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
Easter is not the same day as Passover.

Second, Easter is pagan.
That's true, but the Greek word does not mean pagan Easter, but the God-instituted Passover. It is translated "Passover" in all the other verses (I think it's 28) in the New Testament where it occurs, and in most other English translations of the bible, apart from the 1611, it is translated "Passover" in Acts 12:4. The pagan "Easter" comes from the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre. As the history of the Anglo-Saxons didn't begin until about 400 AD, what could their false goddess have to do with events described in Acts 12?
 
That's true, but the Greek word does not mean pagan Easter, but the God-instituted Passover. It is translated "Passover" in all the other verses (I think it's 28) in the New Testament where it occurs, and in most other English translations of the bible, apart from the 1611, it is translated "Passover" in Acts 12:4. The pagan "Easter" comes from the Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre. As the history of the Anglo-Saxons didn't begin until about 400 AD, what could their false goddess have to do with events described in Acts 12?
Actually, Sam Gipp debunked the first accusation. Its the same word in Greek for both.

Second, all the Passover verses were before Jesus rose again.

So, it was still Jewish Passover and now is Easter.

Shawn
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
Actually, Sam Gipp debunked the first accusation. Its the same word in Greek for both.

Second, all the Passover verses were before Jesus rose again.

So, it was still Jewish Passover and now is Easter.

Shawn
How could it be, if the people whose pagan goddess gave her name to Easter weren't around until 400AD?
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Easter is not the same day as Passover.

Second, Easter is pagan.
That is not true in its usage in the pre-1611 English Bibles. Easter was used for the Jewish Passover in several of the pre-1611 English Bibles. The early English Bible translators did not use Easter to refer to a pagan festival. You have been misinformed.

The 1535 Coverdale’s Bible has “Easter” at many verses, especially in the Old Testament (Lev. 23:5, Num. 9:2, Josh. 5:10, . . . Ezek. 45:21), for the Jewish Passover, which the KJV revised to “passover.“

Comparing Scripture with Scripture, Luke, who was also the human writer of the book of Acts, clearly used the Greek word pascha to refer to either the entire period--the one day of Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread or as an acceptable name for the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Luke wrote: “Now the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover” (Luke 22:1). Along with Luke 22:1, the above KJV-only statements also ignore Ezekiel 45:21 where the Passover is referred to as “a feast of seven days.” In Ezekiel 45:21, the name “Passover” was clearly used for or used to include the feast of Unleavened Bread, which is a feast of seven days. In Matthew 26:17, the name “Passover” was used for a time described as “the first day of the feast of unleavened bread.” After Jesus and his disciples had already observed the feast of Passover (Luke 22:14-15; John 13:1), the same Greek word was still used for a time when the feast of unleavened bread was in progress (John 18:28).
 
Top