How am I being inconsistent?If you would just be consistent, you are starting to make sense. But you are not quite there yet.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How am I being inconsistent?If you would just be consistent, you are starting to make sense. But you are not quite there yet.
The Lord’s day is applicable to every day that the Lord owns. (He owns them all by nature of His creation of them, but still not every day is given to Him)How am I being inconsistent?
I wanted to broaden your mind by letting you know that there are sound interpretations of 'the Lord's day' other than the one you hold.
john being in the Day of the Lord
10 | I was in the Spirit on the Lord`s day, and I heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet |
3 | And he put forth the form of a hand, and took me by a lock of my head; and the Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the gate of the inner court that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy. |
2 | I know a man in Christ, fourteen years ago (whether in the body, I know not; or whether out of the body, I know not; God knoweth), such a one caught up even to the third heaven. |
3 | And I know such a man (whether in the body, or apart from the body, I know not; God knoweth), |
4 | how that he was caught up into Paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter. |
Just so it's understood that scripture is silent with regard to that.The early church worshipped on Sunday as a congregation (the "assembly")
I don't see the difference with regard to its meaning.The Day of the Lord
The Day __ ___ Lord‘s
They are not the same words.
Kinda. In Acts 20 we read "on the first day of the week, when we gathered to break bread" to mean they gathered on Sunday.Just so it's understood that scripture is silent with regard to that.
See post #56.Kinda. In Acts 20 we read "on the first day of the week, when we gathered to break bread" to mean they gathered on Sunday.
What I meant by "kinda" is in the Bible we do not have many examples of the days the Christians met as a congregation. We know that they gathered on Sunday, however we do not know that they gathered as a congregation on other days.See post #56.
Only two times to be exact. And in neither of those two times is anything said about rest and worship. So, I don't think that those two examples are really appropriate as proof texts for suggesting that they were evidence that the Lord had changed His commandment for rest and worship from the seventh day of the week to the first.What I meant by "kinda" is in the Bible we do not have many examples of the days the Christians met as a congregation. We know that they gathered on Sunday...
Assuming that's true, and I'm not sure it is, what are you suggesting?...however we do not know that they gathered as a congregation on other days.
Since we are not under the Law, where in the NT do you find the command to meet or rest on the seventh day.Only two times to be exact. And in neither of those two times is anything said about rest and worship. So, I don't think that those two examples are really appropriate as proof texts for suggesting that they were evidence that the Lord had changed His commandment for rest and worship from the seventh day of the week to the first.
Assuming that's true, and I'm not sure it is, what are you suggesting?
What I am suggesting is that they met on the Lord's Day as a congregation.Only two times to be exact. And in neither of those two times is anything said about rest and worship. So, I don't think that those two examples are really appropriate as proof texts for suggesting that they were evidence that the Lord had changed His commandment for rest and worship from the seventh day of the week to the first.
Assuming that's true, and I'm not sure it is, what are you suggesting?
You don't know that.So we know that they did not meet on the Sabbath as a church,
I never said that.and you are saying they did not meet on Sunday as a church.....
What do you mean by "under the Law"?Since we are not under the Law,
Other than Hebrews 4:9, which may or may not be a command, depending on the translation being used , I'm not aware of any actual command to observe the Sabbath.where in the NT do you find the command to meet or rest on the seventh day.
And the Lord specifies that the day for rest is to be observed on the seventh day of the week.Technically you can separate the day you meet and the day you rest.
We do not know absolutely, but given that the first Christisns were Jewish and observed the standards of their cukture (attending Temple and synagogue), there is a reasonable expectation that they did not also meet as a congregation. They could have (it is not impossible) but we do not know that they did.You don't know that.
I never said that.
Maybe, I'm merely pointing out that 1 Corinthians 16:2 is not an appropriate verse to use as support for a meeting on the first day on the week. - although, I suppose someone might dig out an ultra-modern "translation" from some loony bin organization which interprets it that way.They could have met for the collection on Sunday and then met again on Tuesday. We don't know.
The context of all of Romans 14 from beginning to end is about food and ideas with regard to eating and not eating. Nothing is mentioned about the Sabbath. Verse 6 explains to what verse 5 is referring; that the verse is talking about eating or not eating (fasting) on certain days of the week.Romans 14:5-9
The same as what Paul meant when he said it.What do you mean by "under the Law"?
Not being under the law doesn’t make the law without affect.Do you include the 10 commandments as part of the law?
Same as you are using for Sunday. That is my point. Your arguments for NT Saturday are not any stronger than NT Sunday.Other than Hebrews 4:9, which may or may not be a command, depending on the translation being used , I'm not aware of any actual command to observe the Sabbath.
So, it's down to using the silence argument against the Sabbath.
So you esteem Saturday over Sunday. That’s great.And the Lord specifies that the day for rest is to be observed on the seventh day of the week.
You have an active imagination. I am merely pointing out that you have as much to stand on in the NT as anyone else who prefers a different day. If you were to follow Scripture on the matter, it would not make any difference to you which day anyone else observed rest.Let me ask you, why do you seem to have such disdain for the Lord's Sabbath?