1) So, are you saying if a person has the opportunity to be baptizes but chooses not to - will he go to heaven?
2) So, are you saying if a person has the opportunity but chooses to ignore the sacraments,- will he go to heaven?
If someone is convicted of the truth of something but rejects it, then it becomes grave matter, then it’s answerable.
Every rejection of truth in essence is a rejection of Christ who is The Truth.
One degree off true over distance leads to great separation.
This is why Scripture must be interpreted in all truth, not the slightest deviation or fallible human interpretation.
“The untaught and unstable will twist them to their own destruction, as they also do with the rest of the Scriptures.”
Misinterpretation of Scripture is deadly. Get one thing wrong and it will lead to other things wrong in a cascade of error.
Take Baptism, Zwingli comes along and decided to interpret scripture that baptism is only symbolic, not regenerational. Totally against all Christianity’s interpretation from the beginning, even against Luther and Calvin.
Deviate just one thing in interpretation of scripture leads to destruction.
As this new interpretation takes, people thinking baptism is merely symbolic may not bother, and lose their salvation as a result.
The guy who interpreted the error in the first place, is answerable for every subsequent soul lost because of his error. Also those that perpetuate the error that costs more souls, may to a lesser degree be culpable as well.
So Jesus meant that unless people are regenerated by water Baptism, they shall not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Serious consequences for getting this wrong.
Baptism was one “unless” lesson Jesus truly truly taught. Get it wrong and serious consequences follow.
Another is “ Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. “
“ My flesh is real food and my blood is real drink “
Mess this interpretation up and destruction follows.
Say a Catholic goes to Judgement getting this interpretation wrong. Then the Lord asks him why he believed that His flesh was real food and blood was drink? And that by eating and drinking the flesh and blood he would have eternal life and be raised on the last day.
The Catholic will simply point to Jesus words in Scripture ‘ You said in Scripture that your flesh was real food and your blood was real drink. You said in Scripture that unless we eat your flesh and drink your blood we would have no life in us ‘
‘ You said that heaven and earth would pass away, but that your words would never pass away, and we believed, we stood on your word in faith and did as you commanded and ate your flesh and drank your blood ‘
Can the Lord deny His own words that stand for all time and eternity?
A Protestant gets this interpretation wrong and at Judgement is questioned by The Lord, why he did not believe His flesh was real food and blood was real drink. Why did you not eat my flesh and drink my blood as I commanded you?
What then could he say?
Jesus will point him to the scripture, these are the words I gave to you, and you did not believe my flesh is real food and blood is real drink, and you did not do as I commanded and eat my flesh and drink my blood to have eternal life.