Orthodoxy refers to the generally accept view or views that people believe are correct. Thus Reformed Baptists have a set of their orthodox view, such as the TULIP, and other branches of Christianity have a differing orthodoxy.
I certainly have views that do not mesh with the Calvinists or Arminians or Easy Believism folks, and on and on.
So the question is, why do people make God's word to no effect. That certainly is not their goal.
First, please read Matthew 15:2, then Matthew 15:3, then Matthew 15:6, then Mark 7:8-9, then Mark 7:13, then Colossians 2:8 and then 2 Thessalonians 3:6.
The idea is that "experts" interpret God's word in ways that differ from the "traditions" established by Christ and His apostles.
What are some of the generally accepted invalid orthodox views of the past?
1) Infant baptism
2) Baptismal regeneration
3) Transubstantiation
Our last question, our food for thought is this, have we reexamined our beliefs that we accepted from parents, teachers or mentors, to guard against accepting the mistaken views of the past?
I certainly have views that do not mesh with the Calvinists or Arminians or Easy Believism folks, and on and on.
So the question is, why do people make God's word to no effect. That certainly is not their goal.
First, please read Matthew 15:2, then Matthew 15:3, then Matthew 15:6, then Mark 7:8-9, then Mark 7:13, then Colossians 2:8 and then 2 Thessalonians 3:6.
The idea is that "experts" interpret God's word in ways that differ from the "traditions" established by Christ and His apostles.
What are some of the generally accepted invalid orthodox views of the past?
1) Infant baptism
2) Baptismal regeneration
3) Transubstantiation
Our last question, our food for thought is this, have we reexamined our beliefs that we accepted from parents, teachers or mentors, to guard against accepting the mistaken views of the past?
Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Last edited:
