• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Maleman

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
The Maleman

An Apologetic on the Claim That Scripture Was Written “By Men, To Men, For Men”


Every now and then, you’ll hear someone say the Bible was written by men, to men, for men. It’s usually said with a shrug, as if the whole book were a male‑only conversation that women were never meant to overhear. It sounds clever, but it doesn’t survive even a simple reading of Scripture.

Yes, the human writers were men. Scripture says that plainly: “Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" 2 Peter 1:21. But the message they carried wasn’t theirs. It was God’s. And God doesn’t speak only to one half of the human race. He speaks to mankind.

The very first chapter of the Bible settles the matter.

So God created man in His own image… male and female created He them” Genesis 1:27.

Right there, before anything else is said, Scripture defines its own vocabulary. When it says man, it doesn’t mean “male.” It means “mankind.” And then it immediately tells you that mankind comes in two expressions: male and female. Both bear the image. Both receive the blessing. Both stand under the Word.

So when Scripture uses the word man in a general way, it’s talking about humanity. When it speaks of men specifically, the context makes that clear. There’s nothing mysterious about it. It’s simply how the Bible uses language.

And Scripture doesn’t hide its address to women. It speaks to them all through its pages. Women receive promises , Sarah, Rebekah, Hannah, Mary. Women receive commands, Titus 2, 1 Peter 3. Women receive blessings , “Blessed is she that believed.” Women receive rebukes, Jezebel in Revelation 2. Women receive prophetic words, Deborah, Anna. Women are disciples, witnesses, servants, and co‑laborers in the gospel.

If the Bible were “for men,” none of that would be there.

The truth is simple: Scripture speaks to women because women are part of mankind , the very category God addresses when He speaks.

And the Bible itself shows that the word man carries two different uses. Sometimes it refers to males , Adam, Noah, Abraham, David, husbands, fathers, young men. But often it refers to humanity , “Man shall not live by bread alone,” “What is man, that Thou art mindful of him?” “Christ died for all men.” These aren’t male‑exclusive statements. They’re human‑inclusive.

The context tells you which one is meant. Modern assumptions don’t.

The idea that the Bible is “for men” only works if you collapse the categories Scripture itself maintains. It confuses male with man, and man with mankind. But Scripture doesn’t confuse those categories. It uses them with precision.

God created mankind. God addressed mankind. God redeemed mankind. God speaks to mankind.

Male and female stand equally under the Word of God.

So the only conclusion you can draw from Scripture is this:

When the Bible speaks of men specifically, it means males. When it speaks of man generally, it means mankind. And when it speaks without specifying sex, it addresses humanity.

The Bible is not a male‑exclusive book. It is God’s revelation to the human race.

~Tony

© A.K. Pritchard 2026 -

Free to use with proper attribution
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
The Maleman

An Apologetic on the Claim That Scripture Was Written “By Men, To Men, For Men”


Every now and then, you’ll hear someone say the Bible was written by men, to men, for men. It’s usually said with a shrug, as if the whole book were a male‑only conversation that women were never meant to overhear. It sounds clever, but it doesn’t survive even a simple reading of Scripture.

Yes, the human writers were men. Scripture says that plainly: “Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" 2 Peter 1:21. But the message they carried wasn’t theirs. It was God’s. And God doesn’t speak only to one half of the human race. He speaks to mankind.

The very first chapter of the Bible settles the matter.

So God created man in His own image… male and female created He them” Genesis 1:27.

Right there, before anything else is said, Scripture defines its own vocabulary. When it says man, it doesn’t mean “male.” It means “mankind.” And then it immediately tells you that mankind comes in two expressions: male and female. Both bear the image. Both receive the blessing. Both stand under the Word.

So when Scripture uses the word man in a general way, it’s talking about humanity. When it speaks of men specifically, the context makes that clear. There’s nothing mysterious about it. It’s simply how the Bible uses language.

And Scripture doesn’t hide its address to women. It speaks to them all through its pages. Women receive promises , Sarah, Rebekah, Hannah, Mary. Women receive commands, Titus 2, 1 Peter 3. Women receive blessings , “Blessed is she that believed.” Women receive rebukes, Jezebel in Revelation 2. Women receive prophetic words, Deborah, Anna. Women are disciples, witnesses, servants, and co‑laborers in the gospel.

If the Bible were “for men,” none of that would be there.

The truth is simple: Scripture speaks to women because women are part of mankind , the very category God addresses when He speaks.

And the Bible itself shows that the word man carries two different uses. Sometimes it refers to males , Adam, Noah, Abraham, David, husbands, fathers, young men. But often it refers to humanity , “Man shall not live by bread alone,” “What is man, that Thou art mindful of him?” “Christ died for all men.” These aren’t male‑exclusive statements. They’re human‑inclusive.

The context tells you which one is meant. Modern assumptions don’t.

The idea that the Bible is “for men” only works if you collapse the categories Scripture itself maintains. It confuses male with man, and man with mankind. But Scripture doesn’t confuse those categories. It uses them with precision.

God created mankind. God addressed mankind. God redeemed mankind. God speaks to mankind.

Male and female stand equally under the Word of God.

So the only conclusion you can draw from Scripture is this:

When the Bible speaks of men specifically, it means males. When it speaks of man generally, it means mankind. And when it speaks without specifying sex, it addresses humanity.

The Bible is not a male‑exclusive book. It is God’s revelation to the human race.

~Tony

© A.K. Pritchard 2026 -

Free to use with proper attribution
As I understand it, New Testament Greek has two words that are translated into English as "man/men": Anthropos means man in the sense of mankind, human beings of both sexes, and aner means a male adult person.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Anthropos means man in the sense of mankind, human beings of both sexes, and aner means a male adult person.
Oh.

In Matthew 19:10,

"If the matter be so between man [anthropos] and wife, it is not good to marry."

In James 1:7-8,

Neither let that man [anthropos] think that he shall receive anything of the Lord. A double minded man [aner] is unstable in all his ways.
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
Oh.

In Matthew 19:10,

"If the matter be so between man [anthropos] and wife, it is not good to marry."

In James 1:7-8,

Neither let that man [anthropos] think that he shall receive anything of the Lord. A double minded man [aner] is unstable in all his ways.
Sorry, it seems I was mistaken. Certainly concordances seem to say that anthropos means human being and aner means a male human being. I should have put my usual disclaimer that apart from a few words, I don't know Koine Greek.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
Sorry, it seems I was mistaken. Certainly concordances seem to say that anthropos means human being and aner means a male human being. I should have put my usual disclaimer that apart from a few words, I don't know Koine Greek.
David, thank you, and truly no issue. The distinction you’re noting is the same one my piece relies on: Scripture uses man in more than one sense, and context determines which category is in view.

Koine Greek reflects this with anthrōpos and anēr, but even anthrōpos isn’t locked into one meaning. Like our English word man, it flexes with context. Sometimes it clearly means “a human,” sometimes “a male,” and sometimes “a person in a specific role.” Your examples show that range.

My argument doesn’t depend on anthrōpos always meaning mankind. It depends on Scripture maintaining two legitimate categories:

  1. Man as humanity - Genesis 1:27.
  2. Man as male - the sex‑specific category.
The point is simply that Scripture itself keeps these categories distinct. When the text intends “male,” it signals it. When it intends “humanity,” it signals that too. And when the context is generic, the address is to mankind.

So the presence of anthrōpos in a male‑specific context doesn’t overturn anything. It actually reinforces the point: the Bible uses the same word in different ways depending on context, exactly as our English translations do.

My piece wasn’t making a linguistic claim about Greek vocabulary. It was making a textual claim about biblical categories: Scripture speaks to mankind, and mankind includes both male and female. Therefore the Bible cannot be “for men only.”
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
Oh.

In Matthew 19:10,

"If the matter be so between man [anthropos] and wife, it is not good to marry."

In James 1:7-8,

Neither let that man [anthropos] think that he shall receive anything of the Lord. A double minded man [aner] is unstable in all his ways.
Jerome, your examples illustrate the very thing I’m arguing: Scripture uses man with more than one sense, and context determines which one is intended.

Anthrōpos often means “human being,” but not always. Like our English word man, it flexes with context. Sometimes it refers to humanity, sometimes to a male, sometimes to a person in a specific role. Your citations show that range clearly.

My argument doesn’t depend on anthrōpos always meaning mankind. It depends on Scripture maintaining two distinct categories:

  1. Man as humanity - Genesis 1:27.
  2. Man as male - the sex‑specific category.
Scripture itself keeps these categories separate. When it intends “male,” it signals it. When it intends “humanity,” it signals that too. And when the context is generic, the address is to mankind.

So anthrōpos appearing in a male‑specific passage doesn’t contradict the point. It confirms it: the Bible uses the same word in different ways depending on context, exactly as our English translations do.

The piece wasn’t making a linguistic claim about Greek. It was making a textual claim about biblical address: God speaks to mankind, and mankind includes both male and female. Therefore Scripture cannot be “for men only.”
 
Top