It changes the story a great deal, Molly. Ruth was there in Bethlehem because she made Naomi her priority. Naomi, Ruth and Oprah had all been widowed and Naomi URGED them to return to Moab because as long as the two daughters-in-law remained in Israel, they would have no hope of remarriage or bearing children. Oprah left but Ruth clung to Naomi, knowing that she would have to support the older lady. Her first priority was to her home and it was necessary that she work to support it. This is all right there in chapter one of Ruth and is the entire basis of the plot of the story.originally posted by Molly: I'm not seeing the change of priorities as God's call on her life as a women.
It's very irritating to me that as long as the altering of a verse or story supports one's premise, it's "okay" with everyone who supports the same premise. The other verses mentioned have been disputed in other threads. If you need, I'll cut and paste the rebuttals.
At least headcovered lady is consistent in saying that women should not have any role in the church that involves leadership, including leading a hymn. But even she is not acknowledging 1Timothy 2:11, "A woman should learn in quietness and full submission," and before anyone says that has to do with church, please find the word "church" in that passage. This was a cultural issue for the time and addressed to Timothy while at the church at Corinth. Greek women were supressed not by Christianity, but rather by the ancient Greek culture.
Further, the Old Testament story of Ruth is NOT a contradiction to the New Testament instructions of Paul. 1 Timothy 5:16, "If any woman who is a believer has widows in her family, she should help them and not let the church be burdened with them, so that the church can help those widows who are really in need." Again, if this "help' mentioned here is not financial, then what, pray tell is it and where in this passage does it say "unmarried woman"? Where is the woman supposed to come up with the money?
I am going to look for a comprehensive list of Biblical women and we'll see how many of them had listed occupations. There has to be one somewhere. I guarantee you that if there is no job listed, they still had to work. People are so spoiled today. I will say again, it is a modern notion that women do not have to work to survive.
I read the MacArthur sermon. Did you read the scripture I cited? Which should take precedent?
[ May 02, 2002, 09:41 AM: Message edited by: Clint Kritzer ]