Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What! All I did was quote the Bible! If you think the bible contains "twisted theology" you do not belong in the "Baptist Only" section of the Baptist Board!Originally posted by Carly33:
But as for the rest, that's some seriously twisted theology!Sorry, I will not reply to any further posts in regard to that issue, I'm not interested in its propagation.
I suspect your confusion is caused by seeing the term "Baptist" as a denominational name instead of a doctrinal identity. Being Baptist has nothing to do with a denomination, but with the Baptist distinctives, which are simply adherence to the bible's teachings.Originally posted by rsr:
What in the world is a "Baptist God?"
There is a God, but I can't consider him the property of one denomination, even though I think the Baptists are correct on many points.
Rather than wasting a lot of time, let me get right to the point.Originally posted by rsr:
What in the world is a "Baptist God?"
There is a God, but I can't consider him the property of one denomination, even though I think the Baptists are correct on many points.
Dear javalady:Originally posted by javalady:
>>Are only IF Baptists going to be part of the bride?<<
You gotta be kidding! I cannot imagine anyone taking this idea seriously. All who belong to the Lord Jesus Christ by faith alone are a part of the Church--His Bride!
Considering my dear Church of Christ Granny who went to heaven in 1986, and my beloved Pentecostal Granny who went to Jesus in 1981:
"Will I see them around the throne in heaven? I fear not--for I will be so far back from the throne, and they will be so close to the side of Jesus!"
[Borrowing the words of the great George Whitefield--an avid Calvinist who was Anglican-- regarding John Wesley--an avid Arminian who fathered Methodism.]
Check again Timothy, see the real conclusion to this matter that you say that you seem to remember. No argue or brag, just fact!Originally posted by TimothyW:
I seem to remember Jesus rebuking some disciples for arguing about who was to be greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Bride, guests, whatever...
A non-qualifer is one who does not fufill all of the Bible requirements to be part of the Bride of Christ. Where are they found? Start in Revelation 19:7&8 then go to Matthew 3:13-15 you will have your answer. If non-Baptists cannot follow the Lord in this one and first act of obedience , how can they even dream of being in the Bride? Hence, the invention of the "universal bride", you know ..the one that goes along with the "universal church". So you see that one lie always call for another and another and another ad infinitum. That's what my parents always said.Originally posted by Carly33:
I am an independant fundamental baptist, and if you mean by non qualifier that I'm not baptist...you are mistaken..
...now you still did not address my question...am I mistaking your comment about some christians being referred to as whores or harlots in Rev.
I don't think its really fair for me to comment if I'm not even sure if that's what you mean.
Maybe someone else can enlighten me....
Total Nonsense!Originally posted by Bro. John Willis:
Insofar as Whitefield, Edwards and Wesley are concerned the same goes for them. They were all members of false churches wilfully and therefore are without excuse. When we see them take notice and be certain they will not be the Bride but guests.
[/QB]