Father Malachi Martin and His writings?

I,ve read a couple of his books. He is a captivating author and critic of his own church. Most Roman Catholics consider him to be a little wackey and not a dependable spokesperson for the RC Church. He is a conspiracy theorist.

 

He is very insightful, his analysis of RC geopolitical vision is excellent.

In Christ,

Bob

 

So Bob, how are you on his insights about the Eucharist, the Pope, salvatoin, Confessoin, baptism, etc. etc. of which he is very Catholic. (I have read quite a little about him). Oh, I know, he's an SDA. Don't believe what the books say about him.

Blessings Bob.

 

AS I said - "Geopolitical" mission and vision.

The "details" again.

Or are you just complaining that I found another RC source to speak positively about?


In Christ,

Bob

 

If I were a betting man I would say you haven't read him just as you haven't read the book of your other so called "sources" such as Leo Tres and Catholic Digest. You like anyone who paints the Catholic Church in a bad light. It's all true for you because of your hard heart Bob.

Blessings

 

Then you would lose.

Bob

 

Bob Ryan,

I never have read anything by Rev. Malachi Martin. Who is he and what is his view about a geo-political position or stance?

 

Boys!

Play nice!

 

Impossible, Bob is the great force of evil(tm) that hangs around on Other Religions / Doctrines.

 

Martin is a best-selling RC author that is most famous for his book "Keys to this Blood".

The fact that "saying something positive" about his views will cause RC-wanna-be's like Mioque to "surface" with some insult is simply "instructive".

Though Martin presents his book in a story form - his insights into the geopolitics of the RCC in the course of recent history is also "instructive".

In Christ,

Bob

 

Alberto Rivera (Jack Chick's 'priest') has been proven a fraud and never to have been a priest....most mainstream Christians have figured this out....most Evangelicals and other mainstream denominations no longer support either of them.


LaRae

 

They prefer to believe lies. It seems to suit their agenda.


LaRae

 

I'll vote on the Alberto is a fraud side.

http://www.cornerstonemag.com/pages/show_page.asp?228

 

True according to who? Care to back up all these truths that Dr Alberto revealed? I find it interesting you take the word of a fraud as truth about the Catholic Church.

Like I said earlier...it suits the agenda.


LaRae

 

Okay.

Suppose ALL the horrors which Jack Chick likes to point out about the Catholic Church are true.

Suppose She is in the middle of one of the worst spiritual declines She has ever been in.

That does not change the reason for my conversion to the Catholic Faith -- and this is something that Mr. Chick either conveniently ignores or outright lies about.

The written testimony of Christian history is that baptism regenerates and makes on a member of the covenant kingdom and the Eucharist is the Medicine of Immortality

For me to be practicing first century Christianity just as the apostles and the Early Fathers did, I MUST be in the Church where these two doctrines are clearly taught, believed, and practiced. NO Protestant denomination believes both of these doctrines.

There is no evidence at all that any other understanding of baptism or the Lord's Supper existed prior to the Middle Ages, and any one who says that they did is DELUSIONAL IN THE EXTREME!!.

The argument from silence alone is deafening!!

If Evangelical Anabaptistry was being practiced in the second century, WHERE is the Church council to discuss this??

If there was another understanding of the Eucharist other than it being truly and substantially the Body and Blood of the Lord -- then again, WHERE is the council to hammer this out??

There is simply no evidence pointing to any other understanding of these two doctrines.

And that is why I have to be of the Catholic Faith.

Brother Ed

 

C'mon now LaRae, this can't really surprise you can it?