1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Tradition

Discussion in 'Free-For-All Archives' started by Bro. Curtis, Feb 13, 2003.

  1. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    The short answer.

    Either the Church does or does not have authority.

    We know from historical documentation that the Bible comes to us through the Church. It was the Church in Council that recognized which writings were or were not inspired and thus included in the Bible.

    If you reject the authority of the Church, in honesty, you must reject the Bible. In which case, I guess that the best you could do is gather up as many ancient writings as you can find and then decide for yourself what is/is not inspired. Good luck.

    Or you can accept that the Church has authority and that the Church excercised that authority in recognizing Scripture. In keeping with that authority, the Church has the authority, granted by Jesus to teach.
     
  2. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thessalonian, I cannot throw away Peter or Paul's writings, they are preserved.
     
  3. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How do I correctly interpret, "for all have sinned" ?
     
  4. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thessalonian, to clarify, Paul was a sinner, yes. So was Moses, David, Solomon, etc. But their writings are inspired of God. That is the difference, the fundamental issue. I believe inspiration stopped, when John wrote "AMEN" at the end of Revelation. You believe inspiration continues, but only thru the RCC.

    A preacher, sins. He cannot help it. But if he preaches from God's word, he need not worry.
     
  5. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Curtis, before you start posting more examples, how about discussing the ones you have already given?

    I will ask yet again, albeit in different words. Hopefully you won't continue to ignore the question. And please remember that you started this thread and I am using an example from your very first post.

    Please explain how you interpret this verse to mean "all" (literally every single one without exception) and at the same time exclude Jesus while the author makes no such exclusion.
     
  6. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    23 for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

    Jesus did it for me. Jesus, being God, deserves the glory. That is the disclaimer, for want of a better term, that excludes Jesus from the "all" word.
     
  7. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can't help seeing the contradiction here, Curtis.
     
  8. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't see one.
     
  9. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    BTW, I assume that dei verbum translates to God's word, correct ?
     
  10. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why do you think that the author of Romans didn't include your disclaimer in verse 10 when he was saying, "...there is none righteous, no, not one".

    Don't you think that your disclaimer is important enough for him to include it?
     
  11. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Are you saying Jesus wasn't righteous ?
     
  12. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.


    You have to read the whole passage. I'm not saying you didn't, but it seems like we are stalling on a non-issue, when talking aboiut tradition.
     
  13. trying2understand

    trying2understand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2001
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I am asking you for a clarification of your position which you took in the very opening psot to this thread which you started.

    Please reconcile the "none is righteous" with the righteousness of Jesus.

    How about a direct answer for a change of pace?
     
  14. show me

    show me New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    '23 for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;"


    The Bible also says that "it is appointed unto man once to die and after that the judgement." How about Enoch? How about Elijah?
     
  15. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ron, I answered it. Christ is righteous. He can "say for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God", because he IS God.

    These attempts at trying to trip me up is your legacy here. And you wonder why we get so frustrated. I can't think of the last question I gat a straight answer to, except Brother Ed's. He always answers, and never hears a cross word from me.
     
  16. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm sorry, I also meant to include Carson, who answered my question, and didn't get credit. Sorry, brother carson.
     
  17. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Show me, are you saying I can't trust my Bible, even when I don't understand ?

    Psalms 145:15 The eyes of all wait upon thee; and thou givest them their meat in due season.
     
  18. rufus

    rufus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    The cultural context is important here. The Jewish Rabbis thought of "father" as "giver of life."

    Jesus was cautioning them about that, for only God is the giver of life (physical) and of LIFE (spiritual).

    rufus [​IMG]
     
  19. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Now THAT's a great response. Thanx, Rufus.
     
  20. GraceSaves

    GraceSaves New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Curtis,

    In light of Rufus' explanation, which you appear to agree with, what contradiction then do Catholics pose? I certainly do not see my parish priest as a giver of life.

    Also, I'm still waiting for "dad" and "father" difference. You don't need a Bible or a Catechism or NewAdvent.com to explain your reasoning. And you've had all day, and you've been posting all day. What is YOUR reasoning that "dad" is okay but "father" is not?

    God bless,

    Grant
     
Loading...