1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Inerrancy Poll #4

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Ed Edwards, Aug 27, 2005.

?
  1. -1. the Bible has errors (i.e. is NOT inerrant)

    2.0%
  2. 0. the Bible has minor errors but is still useful

    8.1%
  3. 1. The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues

    2.0%
  4. 2. inerrant on all issues like historic/scientific

    58.6%
  5. 3 .The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs

    13.1%
  6. 4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version

    6.1%
  7. 5. inerrant in any English translation based on the TR

    8.1%
  8. 6. inerrant in all faithful English translations

    2.0%
  9. 7.inerrant as applied by _____ (post person or group)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  2. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #82 [​IMG]

    Your vote is appreciated!!
     
  3. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Poll Results: Inerrancy Poll #4 (88 votes.)
    new votes shown from 84 votes:

    +3 3 .The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 57% (50)
    +1 4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version 14% (12)

    Original autographs continue 3 to 1 (new,
    4-to-1 old) over KJV1769 Edition King James
    Bible (KJB). Of course, this is among BB
    (baptist board) memabers only.
     
  4. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #83 [​IMG]

    Your vote is appreciated!!
     
  5. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #84 [​IMG]

    Your vote is appreciated!!
     
  6. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Poll Results: Inerrancy Poll #4 (93 votes.)
    (compared with 76 votes)
    The last 17 votes are in the first column:


    +1 -1. the Bible has errors (i.e. is NOT inerrant) 01% (01)
    == 0. the Bible has minor errors but is still useful 01% (01)
    +1 1. The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 09% (08)
    +2 2. inerrant on all issues like historic/scientific 02% (02)
    +8 3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 55% (51)
    +3 4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version 14% (13)
    +1 5. inerrant in any English translation based onthe TR 06% (06)
    +1 6. inerrant in all faithful English translations 10% (09)
    == 7.inerrant as applied by ____ (post person or group) 02% (02)
     
  7. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #85 [​IMG]

    Your vote is much appreciated!!
     
  8. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, but while I was editing a response, the
    topic was closed???

    Amen, Brother Tom Cassidy -- Preach it! [​IMG]

    What you say would make a good trailer --
    every time you say it some are ignoring it,
    goodness, it already is a trailer.

    The KJV1611 Edition footnote at Psalms 12:7
    blows KJVOism right out of the water.

    Please use 'KJVs' instead of 'KJV'

    ;
    there are many editions of the KJVs
    Please use "Textus Recepti" (plural)
    instead of "Textus Receptus" (singular);
    there are multiple versions of the
    Received texts.

    Present in my KJV1611 (Paper) Edition are translator footnotes. Present in my
    KJV1873 (Papter) Editon are translator
    footnotes. NOT present in eight of my paper
    KJV1769s and my paper KJV1850 is the
    translator footnotes. HONESTY demands the
    the translator footnotes.
     
  9. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #86 [​IMG]

    Your vote is much appreciated!!
     
  10. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voter #87 [​IMG]

    Your vote is much appreciated!!
     
  11. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here are the results of Inerrancy Poll #1.
    Note the possible answers were slightly
    different from the current poll:

    Here are the results from the first poll:

    Poll Results: Is your Bible Inerrant? (99 votes.)
    Is your Bible Inerrant?
    Choose 1

    -3 the Bible has many major errors and is invalid 0% (0)
    -2 the Bible has major errors so is only marginally useful 1% (1)
    -1 the Bible has minor errors and should be used with caution 1% (1)
    0 the Bible has minor errors but is still useful 5% (5)
    1 The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 11% (11)
    2 The Bible is inerrant on all issues: doctrinal, historic, and scientific 12% (12)
    3 The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 45% (45)
    4 The Bible is inerrant only in the Textus Receptus (TR) 3% (3)
    5 The Bible is inerrant only in the KJV 1611 (exclusive of translator notes) 4% (4)
    The Bible is inerrant only in the KJV 1611 (including the translator notes) 2% (2)
    7 The Bible is inerrant only in the KJB1769 and/or KJB1873 1% (1)
    8 inerrant in any English translation based on the TR 3% (3)
    9 inerrant in any English translation translated by dynamic equivalence 1% (1)
    10 The Bible is inerrant in all English translations 10% (10)
    11 inerrant as implemented in the Doctrine of the Church of England 0% (0)
    12 inerrant implemented in the US Republican Party platform 0% (0)
     
  12. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The last five votes have been for:

    3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 57% (56)

    I need two more votes so I can quit
    Inerrancy Poll #4.

    I'm ready to vote again [​IMG]
     
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The last six votes have been for:

    3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 58% (57)

    I need one more vote so I can shut down Inerrancy Poll #4.

    I'm ready to vote again [​IMG]
     
  14. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    there ya go, you got 58%. to me, the Bible is absoulte truth. if someone finds a contradiction, i just assume i do not understand the issue well enough. i read the NKJV, but like the NIV also.
    God bless your minsitry
     
  15. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The last eight votes are all for:

    3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 58% (59)

    And we done bumped over 100 :( ah well,
     
  16. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you voters, but it is time to start a
    new poll.

    This poll is continuted at:
    CLICK HERE - #5 Bible Inerrancy Poll - CLICK HERE
     
  17. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As requested, topic is closed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...