Science in our public school systems

We had a very fine Creationism seminar at our church and I questioned him about my children in public schools and them not passing tests because they didn't believe in evolution and he said this.. If you raise your children to believe in God and have your foundation in place when this comes about then they will know true and false doctrine and be ok in school. My husband and I both have to work and I am unable to homeschool and can't afford Christian Schools so my take on that is this I will not pull my child from a public school and try to shield him from society because when he grows up he will need to know what he is facing in life. My husband was Christian Homeschooled and he is so wonderful and intelligent and my hats go off to all you homeschooling families!!

 

I find it interesting that the same word
can have various meanings. Often it is
the true Scripture, the written word of God,
that means various to different people.

For example look at "day".
I'm using THE RANDOM HOUSE COLLEGE DICTIONARY,
REVISED EDITION (Random House, 1982)
cause i have one.

Day1 - the interval of light between two
successive nights (i.e. an average 12-hour
day but can vary by season between an 4-hour
day and a 20-hour day)

Day2 - the light of day; daylight
(i.e. as #1 only emphasising the quality
not the time)

Day3 (AKA: 24-hour day)

Day3A - (AKA: mean solar day)
- the average length of the period in which the earth makes one
rotation in the sky (relative to the sun)

Day3B -- a division of time
equal to the time elapsed between two consecutive
returns of the same terrestrial meridian to
the sun

Day3C - (AKA: civil day)
- a division of time equal to 24-hours but recokened
from one midnight to the next.

Sidereal Day3D - (23 hr 56 min day)
- the interval between two successive passages of the
vernal equinox over the meridain

48-hour Day3E -- (not mentioned in dictionary)
- a division of time during which all meridians
experience the same day3 (i.e. a named day
like 1 March 2003 is found somewhere on the
earth for 48-hours)

Day4 -- a day like the Day3 type days but
on another planet

Day5 - (i.e. 8-hour day)
- the part of a Day3 devoted to labor

Day 6 -- (often cap.) a day3 assigned to
a particular purpose or observation:
New Year's Day

Day 7 -- a time considered as
propitious or opportune

Day 8 -- (ofetn: Days) a particular time
or period

Day 9 -- period of existance, power, or influence
in the days of the dinosaurs

When "day" appears in Bible prophecy, we need to
examine which meaning of day makes most sense.

Read 2 Peter 3:10 "day of the Lord" in light
of 2 Perter 3:8 (1,000 years = 1 day).
What kind of dayX is "day" here?

Not the 12-hour day1,
not the 24-hour days3,
not the otherworldy day4,
not the 8-hour day5,
not a 24-hour special day6.
No we must choose between these days:

Day7
Day8
Day9

What is with all those verses starting
with "and" in Genesis 1. In school they
taught me NOT to start a sentence with "and"?

 

A few points.

1. An excellent page on radiocarbon dating is here: http://www.c14dating.com/int.html
You will find the dating is much more limited than your friend admitted -- it's about 50-75 THOUSAND years, tops.

2. "Yom", the Hebrew word for "day" that is used in Genesis 1 also has most of the English meanings mentioned. However, when it is used to mean anything other than a 24 hour day (the presumed meaning without other phrases added), then one will find either a clear allegorical statement ("a thousand years is like a day..."), or the equivalent of the English prepositional phrase with it ("in the day of the Lord"...). With extremely few other exceptions, none of which are in Genesis 1, "yom " will always refer to a 24 hour day. There are other Hebrew words for extended or indefinite lengths of time. In using the references to evening and morning, clear markers of our 24 hour days, and in the use of ordinal numbers (first, second, third...), the clear meaning of 'yom' as a 24-hour day is emphasized in Genesis 1.

One can agree or disagree with Genesis 1, but one should take it on its own terms as a clear historical narrative and not attempt to force other terms upon it which would then make it 'compatible' with evolution. Genesis 1 is a clear and definite refutation of both long ages and evolution the way it is written. Changing the interpretation to try to force-fit it with long ages and evolution does not do a thing regarding changing the intent of the author in describing the events as they happened.

3. It is absolutely not enough to raise children to simply say "God did it" and not care how. This will encourage the kids to believe in the scientists rather than God, number one. This will undermine the entire faith eventually, for it makes the Bible subject to human interpretation, and the result is one of two: rejection of the whole "Biblical thing", which we have seen a lot of in our universities and colleges; or theistic evolution -- a position respected by neither side (evolution or creation) but used mightily anyway by evolutionists (see? it's possible to believe in both!). It's not possible to believe in both, for there are distinct contradictions and one must choose one way or the other. Theistic evolutionists, without any exceptions I have run across myself, all believe in man's wisdom above the biblical revelation. Man's wisdom, however, changes with the winds....

4. The incredible amounts of evidence which deny evolution and support creation really should be learned by parents (and NOT from Hovind!) so that their children will know there is a reason for the hope their parents have. God did not present an opposing testimony in creation! Both creation and the Bible give strong and clear testimony to recent creation. To not learn and present that evidence is to lose by default to the public presentations of evolution. To abandon this extremely critical area, which is actually the foundation of the entire Bible (every major doctrine has its roots in Genesis), is to offer your child sand instead of rock on which to base his faith: human wisdom trumps God's Word. This does not deny salvation, but it can deny an effective witness for Christ in this life.

5. It's not simply a matter of a 'supernatural designer' being 'obvious.' It's a matter of knowing you can trust God to communicate clearly in His Word. He either is or is not trustworthy in His communication to us.

 

Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Modern science taught in public schools denies the Scripture by contradiction and/or silence.

Science (so-called) teaches that human death is a normal biological function of the aging process and not the result of sin. Evolution teaches that death was here from the beginning before man came ("evolved") upon the scene.

The literalness of the person of Adam is taught in both the OT and the NT and that death came AFTER Adam sinned. The person of Adam is inextricably woven into a six/seven solar day creation.

The model of a six/seven solar day week is used in the Scripture to confirm the duration of the act of the creation of heaven and earth.

HankD

 

My wife graduated in science education from the University of Iowa ( a VERY secular university) in 1985. They were taught to teach that evolution is a THEORY and a BAD theory at that. They were instructed to show the problems with it. On the other hand it was never even suggested to mention creationism.
I teach geography (in a public high school) and I teach like john6:63 was saying, that micro evolution is provable but there is no evidence for macro evolution. I would like to point the finger at two more organizations though.
1) The National Geographic Society. There is no better creator of geography films and no bigger liar when it comes to evolution and earth-age. They present all of it as fact.
2) The companies that produce Student Atlases for schools and specifically NYSTROM (owned by Herff Jones). Nystrom produces 2 main atlases, one really complete, one not as complete, but in the inside cover in the "better" of the two is "world facts". The first fact cited is that the earth is 4.6 billion years old. We had a grant to buy new atlases and I ordered the "not so good ones" and I was called by the company and it was pointed out to my principal that I was not getting the good one that was a MUCH better deal, so I got to explain to NYSTROM and HAD to explain to my administration that I would not order something that presented lies (or at best theeories) as facts. I was told by both I was over-reacting. But it is my classroom and I got the ones I wanted. BTW about every 5 years, the earth ages by 100 million years according to the atlas publishers.

 

John6:63: " ... the Mormons have their own Bible."

Actually, they have two:
BOOK OF MORMON
DOCTRINE & COVENANTS.

John6:63: //I don’t think I would let a “college dictionary”
explain to me what the Holy Sprit meant when
He says an “X” amount of days = a year//

Sorry, i'm not buying anything today from your
cult of ignorance. Where does the Bible say how
many days are in a year? BTW, i do know how to make
a reference for quotation; very useful when doing
comparative studies. Also a legal requirement when
quoting somebody. You do have an on-line lawyer, yes?

John6:63: "IMO, God said he created the earth in 6 days,
6 literal days, if this weren’t the case, as the
examples stated below, he would have signified that
each day would’ve represented “X” amount of days."

NOtice your opinion has NOTHING to do with what God
would really do. Well, unless God has died and left
you in charge

John6:63: "I hope coming from a SB that you’re end comment was a joke."

It was no joke. I also note that the end-time prophecy
of Jesus in Matthew 24 has a lot of verses that
start with "and". I'm not sure it is the same
"and" we use a lot to connect similar ideas all
the time.

I said: //What is with all those verses starting
with "and" in Genesis 1. In school they
taught me NOT to start a sentence with "and"? //

I probably should have said:

What is with all those verses starting
with "and" in Genesis 1? In school they
taught me NOT to start a sentence with "and".

So what is the answer to my question?

 

John, Hovind is a popularizer. He is a charismatic (personally, not doctrinally) speaker who is, quite frankly, not wedded to the truth. A reasonable amount of what he presents is a combination of his opinion and outdated material.

Although I do not agree with everything they put out, ICR (Institute of Creation Research --http://www.icr.org/store/ ) is an excellent resource for educational materials for children. On a more adult level, the True Origins website at www.trueorigin.org has an excellent series of essays and other material written by the scientists themselves for the most part.

A few books I think are very worthwhile reading are:

Icons of Evolution by Jonathan Wells
http://www.arn.org/arnproducts/books/b038.htm

Biology by Rebecca Keller
http://www.arn.org/arnproducts/rs4k/rs10.htm

"Unlocking the Mystery of Life" is an outstanding video that I could not recommend more highly:
http://www.arn.org/arnproducts/videos/v026.htm

The above are from Access Research Network (ARN) here: http://www.arn.org/
Scan their material for other excellent material.

And I will always recommend my husband's website for those who are interesting in the physics material and time question: www.setterfield.org

We will be adding to the geology section soon and will start a biology section, I think, also.

Doug Sharp has kept up a very good page on the evolution/creation material from the creation point of view here:
http://www.rae.org/

And this is just the uppermost tip of the iceberg.

David Plaisted has kept up with a lot of stuff here:
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/

Lambert Dolphin keep up a resource page with all kinds of stuff on it -- use the library and then the search engine to find what you may be interested in: http://www.ldolphin.org/

The list goes on...there is plenty of solid material out there for anyone who wants it.

 

Thank you, Sister Helen, for the nice
list of books. They are useful study.

 

I might add that i live in Oklahoma where
half the adults are members of a Baptist
church. So probably half the teachers
in the public school system are also Baptists
(recall that "Baptist" covers a large
territory and a varity of religious
beliefs other than the basic fundamentals
of Christianity).
And probably half the science teachers
in the public school are also Baptists.
I know my High School Biology teacher
was a member of the Christian Church across
the street from his biology lab.
When i first went to college i took Botany
from a Baptist. In fact, four years later,
after some Air Force time, i was a member
of the same church (Trinity Baptist, Ada,
Oklahoma) as this biology teacher. Needless
to say, he mentioned the evolution of species
as a poor theory that some other Biologists
had, but he was a Creationist.

The milage of others may vary.
(note to the humor impaired: the
phrase "the milage of others may vary"
comes from car ads on TV. They will claim
an exceptional milage for their car
and end with the caveat: "the milage
of others may vary" so they can't be sued
for false advertizing. Thus the phrase
"the milage of others may vary" means that
the experience of others may not be exactly that
which i have had.)

 

John6:63: "Science teaches a lot of garbage in college
that isn't true."

I agree.
But you have no idea what my agreement means.

Sorry, got some other stuff to do today.
Talk to you later.

May all God's best blessings be unto
Brother John6:63 this very day and unto
his family and his ministry.
May this be done so that we might give all
the more honor and glory unto our blessed
Lord and Savior: Messiah Yeshua. Amen!

 

John6:63: "I never suggested that God left me in charge."

well, maybe i extrapulated a bit from what you said.

John6:63: "IMO, God said he created the earth in 6 days,
6 literal days, if this weren’t the case, as the examples
stated below, he would have signified that each
day would’ve represented “X” amount of days."

This seems to put a stipulation on what God
aught to have done. As Sister Helen alluded to:
God told us everything we need to know in
His Bible. But i'm here to say that God didn't
tell us everything about everything.
I still use a technical manual to adjust the
time on my clock, not the Bible.
God told us everything important in His Holy Bible;
not everything we will ever need.

Of such is the timing of creation.
The age of the universe doesn't effect my
salvation one bit. Only Jesus and Him crucified
and resurrected effects my salvation.

 

JOhn6:63: "Once I signed up for this board I was surprised that some Baptist believed in some portion of evolution and some don’t take the Bible literally. But hey, that’s what a message board is…to discuss ones views"

Yes, my wife was surprised when she got on this
Baptist Board and found out about all the flavors
of Baptists. I'd read like the 7th edition of
HANDBOOK OF DENOMINATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
and was prewarned (plus i'd had some contact with
other types of Baptists). Yes, Baptists are
not homogenious (all alike). But i found in large
they are all Baptists and hold to a common
Baptistic background.

John6:63: "May God bless you and your family, Edifier"

And may it be double blessings to you wherein
you prayed for God to bless me.
Actually if i didn't here somebody I'd say:
"and double back to you". If the asked for me
a blessing i asked for them a double blessings;
if they cursed me, i asked for a double cursing
back

I need to run close on an condominium for
my son to live in which he finishes the last
two years of college. Fortunately he is taking
fine arts (music composition) and not one of
those hairy science programs
I have a degree in Secondary
Education in Math & Physics and i have anotaher
degree in Electrical Engineering.