KJBOism?

And it goes on and on and still not one verse from any version of the Bible that declares that the KJV is God's only word. It seems clear that there are those who intend to add to the Scripture and then judge their brothers and sisters not by the Scripture, but by what they have added. Dangerous ground almost to the point of claiming self-deification and authority.

Sad,

Bro Tony

 

No Mr. Rob your incorrect read Psalms 49:20 [/i]

Psalm 49:20, KJV: "Man that is in honour, and understandeth not, is like the beasts that perish."

Please tell me how THIS VERSE applies to KJVOism whatsoever, let alone, to the KJV alone. Methinks you're shooting in the dark again.

and there are no excuses and thats all you are giving me not scripture! Kewpile doll time!

MY POINT EXACTLY!

There are NO scriptures in the KJV supporting KJVOism. I need no Scripture to state KJVOism is false due to its lack of Scriptural support. The 'burden of proof' lies with the KJVO to support his doctrine with Scripture, and NOT with we Freedom Readers who reject it for lack of such Scripture. Just admit it, Mr. Correa...You're just GUESSING.

However, if ya wanna be KJVO without the baggage of the KJVO myth, by all means do so. There are many such members here.

 

Rev. Lowery, all your "differences" have been dealt with earlier, as a scan of the archives should reveal to you, but one in particular merits comment...
Luke 2:33

"And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him."

The King James credits Mary with being the mother of Jesus, but does NOT refer to Joseph as His father. However, many new versions imply that Joseph WAS the father of Jesus by changing out the word "Joseph" with the word "father."

This deserves comment because it's one of, maybe *THE* most abysmally-IGNORANT mantras chanted by the KJVO authors. You might note these verses in the KJV's Luke 2:

27And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law,

41Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover.

48And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.

Evidently, Terry Watkins & a coupla others who cited Luke 2:33 & 2:43 hadn't read their KJVs too closely before making their incorrect comments. YOU, Sir, are without excuse to further support this stuff now that your own KJV has supplied you with the truth. The KJV also correctly calls Josepf His father.

Was Joseph Jesus' father? Biologically, no, but legally, yes, by both Roman & Jewish law, as he was married to Mary before Jesus was born. And who acted as His earthly father during His childhood?

It's ridiculous points as this one is, that makes the KJVO myth so non-believable. It's no more than a desperate ploy by the KJVOs to try to find ANYTHING to attack other versions.

 

Mr. Correa:You took the words right out of my mouth there is no such thing as KJVism and you cant give me Scripture to back it up!Next!

OK, here's yer next...

If it looks like a rose, smells like a rose, feels like a rose....

You appear to believe that the KJV is the ONLY valid English Bible version there is. You use many of the same excuses that others who believe likewise do. Therefore, you're a KJVO. And enough people believe likewise to have created KJVOism.

And as I said, it's the KJVO who must make his case with Scripture.

Next...

 

Rev. Lowery:So your next question is how do we know the Bible is exact Rev. Lowery? That's known as this little thing called Faith and believing that God is true to his promises.

But faith that the KJV ALONE is exact(and the ONLY valid English Bible version) is BLIND FAITH, otherwise known as GUESSWORK. It's not BIBLICAL faith.

From the KJV: Hebrews 11:1Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Where is the SUBSTANCE of KJVO, namely Scriptural support? And where is the EVIDENCE, besides a whole passel of GUESSWORK?

 

Same place the support for Alexandrianism is found:Endsville

 

My Pastor, Dr Larry Chappell, says that the KJV is the MOST ACCURATE of translations. Why not use the MOST ACCURATE? It was good enough for my Mom and Dad, and it is certainly readable at the 4th grade level, so all those excuses of making it more "palatable" by re-writing it are worthless in my opinion.

KJV here til I die and go to Heaven!!!

 

I love the KJV so much I use three
different KJVs every weeks (and have several
others I only check every year or so):

1. KJV1611 Edition
2. KJV1769 Edition
3. KJV1873 Edition (may be the same
as came out in 1850)