Unanswered Q's from KJBOism

The NIV followed the LXX and 1 Hebrew mss.

 

Originally posted by standingfirminChrist:
Again Bro,

Why would the Holy Spirit convict my heart to believe the KJV is the most accurate Word, and another's heart that something else is more accurate, and another something else...?

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT...

In the same way He dispenses His various Spiritual gifts as He will. He gives some the gift to preach, another, to teach, another to be a musician, etc.

In the verses I posted above, some removed the Father and the Son all together. God inspirie? I don't believe so.

Why not? What about context? Can you actually PROVE they are ommissions?

You may say that the words were added in the other translations instead of taken away in the ones, but I don't think God would say it was added at all.

MY view carries equal weight.

It is saying the Holy Spirit is a respector of persons. Pointing one to a truth, and another to a lie.

But you haven't proven one is a lie. All you've offered is OPINION. However, it's FACT, not just opinion that KJVO has NO SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT, and that the very texts used to translate the KJV differ among themselves. Again, with all due respect, Sir, it's a case of guesswork and opinion verses FACTS.

BTW, Sir, you make a very polite and well-intentioned defense of KJVO. Problem is, the FACTS show it's wrong, especially the pesky fact of NO SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT.

 

I cannot show scriptural support for my belief, you are correct. But it is not because it is not there. It is because many do not want to see it.

Satan subtly questioned God's Word from the beginning and is still questioning it today and deceiving many.

Having eyes to see and ears to hear, they see and hear not.

 

Amen, Brother StandingfirminChrist -- Preach it!

On of Satan's most popular tools is
'one and only one book'ism - limiting God to
one and only one book.

Caveat: It is easy to prove one and
only one Lord and Savior, one and only one
begotten Son of God -- imposible to prove
'one and only one book'ism

 

SFiC , you can't show scriptural support for your contention , but it is there anyway , people just don't want to see it ? What kind of double-talk are you engaging in ?

Because many recognize that the KJB is not as accurate as other English translations -- does that mean in your eyes ,that those whose preference differs from yours are questioning God and His Word ? Is that what you mean?

 

DD--could it be the manner in which you are asking questions? You have a very arrogant attitude--no matter what anybody responds to you---and they DO respond to you--they are incorrect in YOUR own estimation of their responses. It could be that people are getting tired of the manner in which you ask questions and assume responses. You put words into other peoples' mouths.

My husband has answered your question, but you REFUSE to accept it--You need to show some respect to those who may have more knowledge than you do--and to those who have lived longer on this earth than you have.

Frankly, I'm tired of the redundancy of your questions. Those questions have been answered one thousand times over.

BTW--why is it that you are allowed to attack the KJV and we are reprimanded for saying anything negative about the MVs--which further proves our point.

 

I am not DD , but I will address one point . What you may consider an " attack " are really examinations of claims by KV Only people . Regarding MV's , some KJV'ers really do attack them , saying that they are not the Word of God , that they remove the blood , the Diety of Christ , etc. You know , nonsense like that .

 

Romans 1:22-23 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

 

What an exegete you are SFiC !

 

The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. (Revelation 17:8)

Now tell me, what does this verse have to do with the price of rice in China? IOW, what is your point here? Do you believe in the book of Revelation?

 

Whether you believe Revelation 17:8 or not, it is true and there is no error in it.

 

What if the Holy Spirit isn't convicting anyone about a specific version? </font>[/QUOTE]Good question!! I normally don't get into these threads, but would like to hear an answer to this question by StefanM.

Ed