"The Message" revisited

Your questions have been answered 1,000 times over but you refuse to acknowledge the answers because you are looking for someone to agree with you. Why don't you simply accept the answers which are given, move forward, and grow up.

 

I do not believe the word 'overtake' is the proper translation of 'comprehend'.

Comprehend is better translated as 'understand'.

 

the greek word has one more meaning TC,

perceive. which means understand or grasp.

 

one also has to look at that word comprehend in this light.

When you physically grasp something, do you say, 'I comprehended this?' No, you say, 'I picked this up.'

Comprehend is a mental word. 'I comprehend the statement that was made.' 'I do not comprehend the meaning of that word.'

 

Boanerges,

It is understandable. When one does not like the message, that one tends to go overboard and attack the messenger.

James 3:8-10 But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

 

SFIC, Why will you not accept the facts that Dr Cassidy lays before you? He isn't speaking from conjecture or an a priori assumption. He is speaking from direct and intimate knowledge.

You have demonstrated yourself to be unteachable. I don't know why Doc still cares enough to try to draw you out of the darkness. Hopefully good will come out of it as many see that his opinions are based on Bible and fact while yours are based on nothing but your own insistence that God had to have preserved the Bible by the means you demand of Him.

[ May 17, 2006, 07:18 PM: Message edited by: Scott J ]

 

I am not in darkness. I am a child of God and therefore in the Light. I see there is another accuser of the brethren in the thread.

 

I am accused of being in darkness and attacking the Word of God when it is others who are attacking the Word of God in me.

 

KJVOnlyism is darkness. It is not true. It is not supported by scripture. It is not supported by objective fact.

You may well be in the "light" regarding your salvation but you are most certainly clinging to the "darkness" concerning KJVOnlyism.

As for this victimhood defense you've assumed, it won't fly. The Bible commands us to stand against error and to correct those among the brethren who are taken in a fault.

Dr Cassidy has shown you that KJVOnlyism isn't biblical. He has shown you that you are wrong on this issue and that while the KJV remains doctrinally true it is not technically true on this particular point. That fact is a direct and complete refutation of the whole KJVO concept.

My "accusation" was based on your demonstrated behavior. You refuse correction and instead use a counter accusation that parallels myself and Dr Cassidy with Satan... and very falsely so.

 

When you refuse the truth what else can be the conclusion?

Not a single time have we attacked the Word of God... What do you mean "in me"? Are you claiming that whatever spirit it was that told you KJVOnlyism was true is as authoritative as the written Word of God?

 

Again, another attack by the accuser of the brethren. I have nowhere stated that I am KJVO. I have stated I am convinced the KJV is the most accurate version, but nowhere have I stated I am KJVO.

Again, understandable. satan wants to discredit God's people because he knows the Word of God will stand.

 

Linda,

Once again, you lie. I asked a yes or no question, and SFiC answered with a question.

Just what does your twisted mind think and "answer" is?

 

having said that, I wlll now refrain from answerings your attacks, as I can see who is behind them.