Genesis 11:1-9 God said Let "US" go down and confound their language when He did that; no one could understand one word the other was saying, so then If I spoke greek or better yet if I were greek I wouldnt understand the Aramaic dialect,
William, I really grow weary of correcting you. Aramaic is not a dialect of Greek. It is closer to Hebrew, but it is pretty much accepted that it is a different language. Aside from that, where do you get this idea that Revelation was written in Aramaic? So far, I have seen no evidence of this.
not because I may not have learned it but it was God who confounded the languages. Now I am from Colombia S.A. but my mom is from Ga. some people say that I am a Colombian with a Georgia accent! Although I am a American! Sounds kind of confusing dosent it. But If I were greek then the dialect would be totally diffrent! dont you agree? I could not understand the way a greek person thinks as he or she is speaking their confounded language!
No, it is possible to learn another language. People do it every day. Just because you are either not that good at it, or dont put in the time to get good at it, doesnt mean other people arent able to. Try and look past your own views for a minute.
So is the same with Erasmus as he beeig Dutch was trying to get the best translation for Keiper estin because it was not the Latin or the Aramaic or the Hebrew but the only text in Greek
William, once again, you are making an unfounded claim, and this is the entire reason no one respects you. First off, Kaiper Estin wouldnt be found in the Latin because those words are GREEK words. Second, ERASMUS DIDNT TRANSLATE ANYTHING!!!! He used textual criticism to make a GREEK TEXT from GREEK TEXTS. He consulted Latin and others, but he did not translate them into Greek. He used them only to verify greek readings. Also, I dont know of any Hebrew or Aramaic copies of Revelation that Erasmus would have used. You once again show that you are speaking about something you know very little about, when simply a trip to the library and a day or 2 of reading would cure it.
THAT WAS INTACT THAT CONTAINED THE APOCALYPSE and No one was willing to take that on except Erasmus and God.
First off, do you know which manuscripts Erasmus used to make his text? If so, please list them. Then, if you would, please list the manuscript he used that contains this reading. If not, will you stop claiming something without evidence?
I mean only God could have done it, because He is the one who confounded the languages in the first place, God, King Jesus, and the Holy Gohst!Amen.
What does this have to do with the validity of this reading, or with your failure to handle this discussion honestly?
