Search results

Open Theism is NOT referring to if God authored sin !

Think one could find better support for holding to the Church of Rome as being such

Some though still see Geneva as superior to the Kjv

No, God is not blocking any to come to Jesus, as their sin natures and desires do that quite well for them on their own

Do you have ANY translator of the 1611 Kjv stating though that they viewed their translation as perfect. inspired, and error free, and so no further translations would have to be done?

Do you agree though then that the 1611 Kjv can fix any issues in the Hebrew and Greek texts?

If there are NO errors or mistakes at all, are you then holding to a translation exactly same as the Originals were, so would also be inspired to us in the translation then also?

ALL of the bible though is inspirited for doctrines and practices, so were the 4 Gospels to us now, or just to ancient Israel then?

Inspired to the Gentiles or not then?

Literally hundreds of differences between 2 editions, and not all "printer errors"

Very informative reading here on this issue https://www.bible-researcher.com/canon10.html

So are you Open Theist then, as you deny God authored sin, correct?

So NONE of the Reformers than by your logic ever held really to Sola Scriptura? So ANY theology would be man made then?

When first saved by the Lord, knew nothing about bible and doctrines, as never attended any church before that time, and was into worshipping and learning in AOG church. even becoming teaching elder there, but after years of studying scriptures, praying, read other views, was forced to conclude...

True, Paul was careful to try not to offend others, so while in Rome acted Roman, while in jerusalem jewish, but He did not see Judaism as He knew it as being an essential part of his life now after saved and commissioned by Jesus

No , as you are ONLY describing Hyper calvinist here, as majority of us No real Calvinist holds to Open Theism, and the view that you see us holding here only is that of the Hyper Calvinists God being open theistic has NOTHING to do with if He authored sin or not van, as since God already knew...

God fully know what Abraham would decide to do before he refused to sacrifice Isaac

By using the word IT in referring to the Holy Spirit, just seems like same thing JW do when they call Him as a force

The reformed doctrine though has always been that the Original books only were inspired, and that English translations made off of them are valid, so were not KJVO

Wonder how KJVO refute that some of their meanings came over from the Latin Vulgate?