1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Mark 16:9-20"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 16, 9, 20
Search Again
Page 3 of 6
  1. MEE
    Post

    Casting out Satan

    ...sorry about that! [img] MEE [img]
    Post by: MEE, May 5, 2005 in forum: 2005 Archive
  2. jacob62
    Post

    Casting out Satan

    To MEE:my response was for StefanM. Music4Him I believe was asking StefanM to explain how Mark 16:9-20 was "added" to the bible.I should address...
    Post by: jacob62, May 5, 2005 in forum: 2005 Archive
  3. music4Him
    Post

    Casting out Satan

    Dont forget D) Mark 16:9-20 is not the original ending of Mark and is therefore uninspired. [/b]</font> Mark 16:9-20 is not the original ending of...
    Post by: music4Him, May 4, 2005 in forum: 2005 Archive
  4. StefanM
    Post

    Casting out Satan

    Dont forget D) Mark 16:9-20 is not the original ending of Mark and is therefore uninspired.
    Post by: StefanM, May 4, 2005 in forum: 2005 Archive
  5. gb93433
    Post

    Does this really happen in U.S Churches?

    Those who believe Mark 16:9-20 think that snake handling is in accordance with what that passage of scripture teaches.
    Post by: gb93433, May 1, 2005 in forum: 2005 Archive
  6. Will J. Kinney
    Post

    They Dare Call This Science!

    Gospel of John John 7:8-10 Is Jesus Christ a liar? In the KJB, NKJV, Revised Version, NIV, ISV and the 2003 Holman Christian Standard we read...
    Post by: Will J. Kinney, Nov 19, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  7. Will J. Kinney
    Post

    They Dare Call This Science!

    They Dare Call This Science! Gospel of Mark Mark 13:33 "Take heed, watch AND PRAY; for ye know not when the time is." The words "and pray"...
    Post by: Will J. Kinney, Nov 18, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  8. bryan1276
    Post

    Is there a secret gospel of Mark?

    there are several reasons not to beleive it. the first is that its secret. where is it? the Lord doesnt work in the dark, he works in the...
    Post by: bryan1276, Nov 17, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  9. Askjo
    Post

    Bible Translations

    I found the quotation concerning Manuscript Evidences Disputes verses from Allan O'Reilly: "Mark 16:9-20 NIV has a note between verses 8 and 9...
    Post by: Askjo, Oct 31, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  10. Archangel7
    Post

    Bible Translations

    You are mistaken about Mic. 5:2 in the NASB, which *does* teach the pre-existing Christ -- "But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be...
    Post by: Archangel7, Oct 31, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  11. Forever settled in heaven
    Post

    Bible Translations

    maybe they let him sneak the Apocrypha between Malachi n Matthew. o really. document it pls. 1. shew me the ungodlies. 2. where did they conform...
    Post by: Forever settled in heaven, Oct 30, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  12. Sola_Scriptura
    Post

    Bible Translations

    How did they make the king their pope? Did they believe he had the power to grant absolution for sins or any other abominable practice of the...
    Post by: Sola_Scriptura, Oct 30, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  13. Sola_Scriptura
    Post

    Bible Translations

    You also demonstrate ignorance of the 2nd century church father Tertullian whose quotes reflect the underlying AV text. Here are some more church...
    Post by: Sola_Scriptura, Oct 28, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  14. Sola_Scriptura
    Post

    The Longer Ending of Mark

    Perhaps people in this discussion of Mark's last 12 verses should read "The Last 12 Verses of Mark" by Dean John Burgon. Available here:...
    Post by: Sola_Scriptura, Oct 24, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  15. Baptist in Richmond
    Post

    Studies of the Original Texts

    Ruckman and Gipp? If the final result is predetermined to be a KJV-Onlyist conclusion, then these would most certainly work......
    Post by: Baptist in Richmond, Sep 27, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  16. HankD
    Post

    Studies of the Original Texts

    That's wonderful Brian. I have had the same experience WITH lexicons, grammar studies, etc for over 40 years now. However, in a subsequent post...
    Post by: HankD, Sep 27, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  17. bryan1276
    Post

    Studies of the Original Texts

    Great books for studies in manuscripts. Dean Burgon's "Mark 16:9-20", "Cause of Corruption", "Revision Revised", any book by Dr. Ruckman is...
    Post by: bryan1276, Sep 27, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  18. PastorGreg
    Post

    response to the "missing verses in NIV"

    Interesting that this article does not note that of the 5,000+ manuscripts discovered, over 90% agree with those from which the KJV was...
    Post by: PastorGreg, Sep 24, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  19. Lacy Evans
    Post

    Is the KJV the "restoration" of God's words?

    Why? I believe the same as you. The original autographs were inspired. You just don't believe that "scripture" (which Biblically includes copies...
    Post by: Lacy Evans, Sep 20, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  20. Askjo
    Post

    Major Doctrinal Differences

    I am not mistaken. Most naturalistic critics said, "The Peshitta is 5th Century." They including you denied the Peshitta is 2nd century because...
    Post by: Askjo, Sep 7, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
Showing results 41 to 60 of 104 Next >
Search Again
Page 3 of 6