1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Genesis 1:3"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 1, 3
Search Again
Page 6 of 7
  1. AV Defender
    Post

    Prove all Things

    I already did with John 16:13,Proverbs 22:17-21,and 1 Corinthians 2:9-13,also see Hebrews 5:14,1st Cor 12:10,1st Cor 2:14,and Romans 9:1. Now if...
    Post by: AV Defender, May 30, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  2. Ransom
    Post

    Prove all Things

    Pioneer said: If my position was an unscriptural position, is it not reasonable to ask you to prove to me why it is unscriptural (using only...
    Post by: Ransom, May 30, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  3. BobRyan
    Post

    Evolution Corrupts the Gospel

    Challenge from page 4 - ALSO without response from our Evolutionist bretheren. That challenge from page 4 ALSO remains unnanswered. Surely...
    Post by: BobRyan, May 10, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  4. Baptist Bible Believer
    Post

    What is YOUR meaning of FUNDAMENTALIST?

    I agree with you entirely, HankD. Romans 5:12 IS effected by our interpretation of Genesis 1-3.
    Post by: Baptist Bible Believer, May 1, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  5. Matt Black
    Post

    Does Creationism Corrupt the Gospel?

    Post by: Matt Black, Apr 30, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  6. BobRyan
    Post

    The Polonium Halo

    That - obviously - is THE POINT. The granite formed quickly (as the Creation Account anticipates) INSTEAD of being restricted to natural processes...
    Post by: BobRyan, Apr 26, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  7. RichardC
    Post

    Evolution Corrupts the Gospel

    Helen wrote: Helen, you and others on this board base your reasoning on the assumption that the Bible comes from God – that God directly or...
    Post by: RichardC, Apr 22, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  8. JamesJ
    Post

    Evolution Corrupts the Gospel

    Well said, and thanks again Helen. If the straightforward reading of Genesis 1-3 is not what most Christians believe these days, oh God let me...
    Post by: JamesJ, Apr 22, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  9. RichardC
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    Helen, you are apparently asserting that God intends for us to understand Genesis 1-3 as a literal account of historical events. I take it that...
    Post by: RichardC, Apr 21, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  10. Helen
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    No, Galatian, the INTERPRETATION of the evidence shows the earth is that old. The more evidence we gather, the more we can see that that...
    Post by: Helen, Apr 21, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  11. The Galatian
    Post

    Evolution Corrupts the Gospel

    This is true. Evolution is about natural processes. True. Miracles are supernatural. Hence, they cannot be explained by natural processes, like...
    Post by: The Galatian, Apr 21, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  12. BobRyan
    Post

    Evolution Corrupts the Gospel

    He is Risen - EVEN though no evolutionary process "SHOWS that to be the case"!! He is Risen - EVEN though "no natural process" explains it. He...
    Post by: BobRyan, Apr 20, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  13. RichardC
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    Helen wrote: Helen, can you believe “what something says” without first determining what it means, that is, what the speaker or author intended?...
    Post by: RichardC, Apr 18, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  14. BobRyan
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    The Genesis 1-3 section you refer to calls ITSELF a "the ACCOUNT" of the creation of earth and ALL that is in it. You "Rewrite" that to say "an...
    Post by: BobRyan, Apr 16, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  15. Matt Black
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    I do not deny the Word of God. Jesus is the Word of God; the Bible never claims that title for itself. If you read my post on Anthro's...
    Post by: Matt Black, Apr 16, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  16. Matt Black
    Post

    The Religion of Evolution

    Helen, I have read further into the website you linked to and I haven't really come across much I haven't heard before when I was a charismatic....
    Post by: Matt Black, Apr 15, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  17. Administrator2
    Post

    The Genesis Day

    HELEN Hi Deacon, Thank you for opening this subject again. I think you will find a lot of it has been discussed already, here:...
    Post by: Administrator2, Feb 12, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  18. Administrator2
    Post

    The Genesis Day

    [Administrator: this thread is limited, upon request, to Bible believing Christians] DEACON One of the key areas of contention in the...
    Post by: Administrator2, Feb 11, 2003 in forum: Creation vs. Evolution
  19. npetreley
    Post

    Arminian vs. Calvinist handling of scripture

    It's fine with me if you want to ignore the challenge, but I hope you don't think that what you just provided is a scriptural defense for your...
    Post by: npetreley, Feb 3, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  20. 4study
    Post

    Arminian vs. Calvinist handling of scripture

    npetreley, I thought your proposition was well stated which is why I found it easy to add comments. No offense was intended. My scriptural...
    Post by: 4study, Feb 3, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
Showing results 101 to 120 of 129 Next >
Search Again
Page 6 of 7