1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Colossians 2:16-17"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 2, 16, 17
Search Again
Page 2 of 4
  1. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Galatians 4:10 in context

    Quoting EB, “You two keep avoiding the context of the passage (especially AFTERward; which neither has even touched yet)...”. Yes, not yet,...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Apr 2, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  2. Eric B
    Post

    Galatians 4:10 in context

    More on "WHO" compelled: Those particular Jews may have been commended for not compelling circumcision; but there were OTHERS which clearly did....
    Post by: Eric B, Mar 27, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  3. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Galatians 4:10 in context

    Continued ... “WHO”? Because it cannot be the Jews! It cannot be me, Paul, you being my witnesses. It cannot be James whom you have known even...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Mar 27, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  4. Eric B
    Post

    Galatians 4:10 in context

    And here is where you make a glaring mistake. You seem to think it impossible that The Jews could be referred to as "the world". But "the world"...
    Post by: Eric B, Mar 24, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  5. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Galatians 4:10 in context

    Second Post: The question: “WHO?” is pivotal for our purpose. This question was also pivotal for a faithful understanding of Colossians 2:16-17....
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Mar 23, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  6. Eric B
    Post

    protestants in denial

    But it's not just tradition. Not even other sabathkeepers go to this length to prove the sabbath. Are they going by "tradition" too? Why doesn;t...
    Post by: Eric B, Mar 11, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  7. Eric B
    Post

    protestants in denial

    Yeah; we've been through that; and you were not able to prove that the Sabbath wasn't apart of either passage. You just assert it. Now, for GE:...
    Post by: Eric B, Mar 11, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  8. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    protestants in denial

    continued, Eric B: “(GE believe(s) God has preserved His word properly translated) Not really because you believe this passage reads something...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Mar 10, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  9. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    protestants in denial

    Dear Eric B, something on the working issue's in here: Eric B quoting GE: Now, please, why don’t you this time quote me verbatim like you often...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Mar 10, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  10. Eric B
    Post

    protestants in denial

    You're the one who's muddled. I never said the text was describing emperor worship. It was you who claimed that the pagans were persecuting the...
    Post by: Eric B, Mar 3, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  11. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    protestants in denial

    GE: Then Paul doesn't say the "Principalities" or "Authorities" prosecuted the Christians for not worshipping the emperor; he says they judged...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Mar 3, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  12. Caissie
    Post

    Jesus fulfilled the law?

    I am sure Jesus said the same thing when his mom asked him if his chores were done, but does that mean he was saying that the law had been...
    Post by: Caissie, Feb 19, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  13. DHK
    Post

    The definition of Christianity...

    Acts 20:6-7 And we sailed away from Philippi after the days of unleavened bread, and came unto them to Troas in five days; where we abode seven...
    Post by: DHK, Feb 18, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  14. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Lord's Day

    I must mnt have made myself clear. If one judaises, he observes the Law - as Ignatius said - "without Christ" - and that is abominable to God. But...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Jan 12, 2005 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  15. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    I just say one thing - or try to say it, and that is, That Jesus Christ is God's Word. And God's Word is His Law - absolutely - there's nothing of...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Dec 15, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  16. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    To follow through my reasoning above, employing your words: Your words are, Q. For Sabbatarians - once you obsere that the Law remains in full...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Dec 11, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  17. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    As this pertains to Colossians 2:16-17, or rather, as Colossians 2:16-17 pertains to this: No Resurrection of Jesus, no Church of Jesus' Own; no...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Dec 11, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  18. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    Bob Ryan wrote, Q:There is no question that Christ perfectly fulfilled the LAW of Lev 19:18 telling mankind that we must love our neighbors as...
    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Dec 11, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  19. Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    Post by: Gerhard Ebersoehn, Nov 4, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
  20. wopik
    Post

    Why Sunday can NOT be the Lord's Day

    Where does it say NOT to observe the holy days and Sabbath in this verse? Colossians 2:16 assumes they are keeping the holydays,etc., and says...
    Post by: wopik, Oct 25, 2004 in forum: Free-For-All Archives
Showing results 21 to 40 of 75 Next >
Search Again
Page 2 of 4